The Temperature Dependence of the Forward-Backward Reactions of the Addition of OH to Benzene, Aniline and Nitrobenzene

  • F. Witte
  • C. Zetzsch
Conference paper

Summary

The temperature dependence of the reaction of OH with benzene, aniline and nitrobenzene has been investigated using the flash photolysis/ resonance fluorescence technique. The Solution of the according system of differential equations allows us to calculate the rate constants for the addition of OH to benzene (k(T) = (2.3+/−0.4) · 10−12 exp(−(190+/−60)/T) cm3s−1), aniline (k(T) = 1.7 · 10−11 exp((440+/−40/T) cm3s−1) and nitrobenzene (k(T) = (6+/−2) · 10 −13 exp(−(560+/30)/T)cm3s−1), the unimolecular decay of the adducts benzene OH (k(T) = 3.4 · 1012 exp(−8200+/−700)/T) s−1) and aniline-OH (k(T) = 6 · 1011 exp(−(8400+/1100)/T) s−1) back to the reactants and a further reaction path of the adduct aniline-OH not leading back to the reactants (k(T) = 8 · 1010 exp(−(7400+/−1100)/T) s−1). The bond dissociation energies of OH to benzene and aniline in the adducts have been determined.

Keywords

Decay Rate Decay Curve Bond Dissociation Energy Flash Photolysis Arrhenius Expression 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    R. A. Perry, R. Atkinson and J. N. Pitts Jr. J. Phys. Chem. 81, 296 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. A. Hansen, R. Atkinson and J. N. Pitts Jr. J. Phys. Chem. 79, 1963 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. J. Doyle, A. C. Lloyd, K. R. Damall, A. M. Winer and J. N. Pitts Jr. Environ. Sci. Technol. 9, 237 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. D. Davis, W. Bollinger and S. Fischer J. Phys. Chem. 79. 293 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. R. Ravishankara, S. Wagner, S. Fischer, G. Smith, R. Schiff, R. T. Watson, G. Tesi and D. D. Davis Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 10, 783 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. Atkinson, K. R. Darnall and J. N. Pitts Jr. J. Phys. Chem. 82, 2759 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. A. Perry, R. Atkinson and J. N. Pitts Jr. J. Phys. Chem. 81, 1607 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    F. P. Tully, A. R. Ravishankara, R. L. Thompson, J. M. Nicovich, R. C. Shah, V. M. Kreutter and P. H. Wine J. Phys. Chem. 85, 2262 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. M. Nicovich, R. L. Thompson and A. R. Ravishankara J. Phys. Chem. 85, 2913 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    K. Lorenz.and R. Zellner Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 87, 629 (1983)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. Wahner and C. Zetzsch J. Phys. Chem. (in press)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    F. Witte, A. Wahner and C. Zetzsch Bull. Soc. Chim. Belg. 92, 625 (1983)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    F. Witte, Diplomarbeit, Ruhr-Universität Bochun 1983Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    H. Rinke and C. Zetzsch Ber. Äopsenges. Phys. Chem. (in press)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    C. Zetzsch Presented at XVth Informal Conference on Photochemistry, Stanford. USA. June 1982Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ECSE, EEC, EAEC, Brussels and Luxembourg 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Witte
    • 1
    • 2
  • C. Zetzsch
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Lehrstuhl für Physikalische Chemie IRuhr-Universität BochumBochumGermany
  2. 2.Fraunhofer-Institut für Toxikologie und AerosolforschungHannover 61West Germany

Personalised recommendations