Well Hydraulics in Heterogeneous Porous Media

  • T. D. Streltsova
Chapter
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSE, volume 82)

Abstract

Heterogeneous porous media consisting of components of markedly different properties are commonly encountered in under-ground engineering practice. In groundwater and petroleum reservoir engineering these are, for. example, the sedimentary deposits of clay interbedded with layers-of sand, fractured formations of tight matrix rock broken up by fissures of secondary origin, or multiporous carbonate sediments such as limestones and dolomites. The mechanism of fluid flow in such heterogeneous formations is governed by distinct diffusivities along the characteristic flow paths within each component. Intercomponent interaction is provided by fluid transfer from a component of low diffusivity (with a resulting slow response to pressure changes) to a component of high diffusivity (correspondingly rapid response to pressure changes). This crossflow enhances the flow through one component of the medium while depleting the other until the transient flow interaction achieves a quasi-steady state and the medium behaves as an equivalent uniform system with composite properties. In naturally fractured reservoirs, for example, fractures serve as high permeability conduits that transmit fluids to a well, while contributing very little to the original reservoir porosity (or storage.) Hence, the high diffusivity of a fracture results in a short, almost instantaneous, response along the fracture to any pressure change such as that due to well production. The rock matrix, on the contrary, has a low permeability but relatively high primary porosity that contains the fluid. The low matrix diffusivity results in a ‘delayed’ matrix response to pressure changes that occur in the surrounding fractures. Such nonconcurrent response causes an intercomponent pressure depletion that induces matrix-to-fracture crossflow. The flow to a well, now enhanced by a time-variant crossflow, is no longer radial. As time progresses, the matrix blocks near the well deplete to pressure equilibrium with the fractures.

Keywords

Unconfined Aquifer Integrodifferential Equation Dimensionless Pressure Heterogeneous Porous Medium Pressure Behavior 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    De Glee, G. J. Over Groundwaterstromingen bij Water Anttrekking Door Middel van Dutten ( Delft, Waltman, 1930 ).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Steggewentz, J. H. and B. A. Van Nes. Calculating the Yield of a Well Taking Account of Replenishment of the Groundwater From Above. Water Eng., Dec (1939) 563–564.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jacob, C. E. Radial Flow in a Leaky Artesian Aquifer. Am. Geophys. Union 27 (1946) 198–208.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hantush, M. S. and C. E. Jacob. Non-Steady Radial Flow in an Infinite Leaky Aquifer. Trans., Am. Geophys. Union, vol. 36 (1955) 95–112.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hantush, M. S. Analysis of Data From Pumping Tests in Leaky Aquifers. Trans., Am. Geophys. Union 37 (1956) 702–714.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hantush, M. S. Hydraulics of Wells Adv. Hydrosci. (1964) 281–432.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barenblatt, G. E., Zheltov, I. P., and I. N. Kochina. Basic Concepts in the Theory of Seepage of Homogeneous Liquids in Fissured Rocks. J. Appl. Math. Mech. (USSR) 24 (1960) 1286–1303.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Warren, J. E., and P. J. Root. The Behaviour of Naturally Fractured Reservoirs. Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 9 (1963) 245–255.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Boulton, N. S. The Drawdown of the Water-Table Under Non-Steady Conditions Near a Pumped Well in an Unconfined Formation. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, London, England, 3 (1954) 564–579.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Boulton, N. S. Analysis of Data From Non-Equilibrium Pumping Tests Allowing for Delayed Yield From Storage. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, London, England, 26 (1963) 469–482.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dagan, G. A method of Determining the Permeability and Effective Porosity of Unconfined Anisotropic Aquifers. Water Resour. Res. 3 (1967) 1059–1071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Neuman, S. P. Theory of Flow in Unconfined Aquifers Considering Delayed Response of the Water Table. Water Resour. Res. 8 (1972) 10311–1045.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Neuman, S. P. Effect of Partial Penetration on Flow in Unconfined Aquifers Considering Delayed Gravity Response. Water Resour. Res. 10 (1974) 303–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Neuman, S.P. Analysis of Pumping Test Data From Anisotropic Unconfined Aquifers Considering Delayed Gravity Response. Water Resour. Res. 11 (1975) 329–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gambolati, G. Transient free surface flow to a well: An analysis of theoretical solutions, Water Resour. Res. 12 (1976), 27–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Streltsova, T. D. Unsteady Radial Flow in an Unconfined Aquifer. Water Resour. Res. 8 (1972) 1059–1066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Streltsova, T. D. Flow Near a Pumped Well in an Unconfined Aquifer Under Nonsteady Conditions. Water Resour. Res. 9 (1973) 227–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Streltsova, T. D. Drawdown in a Compressible Unconfined Aquifer. H. Hydraul. Div., ASCE, 100, HY8 (1974) 1601–1616.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Boulton, N. S. The Influence of Delayed Drainage on Data From Pumping Tests in Unconfined Aquifers J. Hydrol. 19 (1973) 157–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Boulton, N. S., and T. D. Streltsova, New Equations for Determining the Formation Constants of an Aquifer From Pumping Test Data. Water Resour. Res. 11 (1975) 148–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hantush, M. S. Modification of the Theory of Leaky Aquifers. J. Geophys. Res. 65 (1960) 3713–3725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hantush, M. S. Flow to Wells in Aquifers Separated by a Semipervious Layer. Eos Trans AGU. 36 (1967) 95–100.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Neuman, S. P., and P. A. Witherspoon. Theory of Flow in a Confined Two-Aquifer System. Water Resour. Res. 5 (1969) 803–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Neuman,. S. P., and P. A. Witherspoon. Applicability of Current Theories of Flow in Leaky Aquifers. Water Resour. Res. 5 (1969) 817–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Neuman, S. P., and P. A. Witherspoon. Field Determinations of the Hydraulic Properties of Leaky Multiple Aquifer Systems. Water Resour. 8 (1972) 1284–1298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Herrera, I., Integrodifferential Equations for Systems of Leaky Aquifers and Applications. Part 2. Error Analysis of Approximate Theories. Water Resour. fces. 10 (1974) 811–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Herrera, I. A Review of the Integrodifferential Equations Approach to Leaky Aquifer Mechanics. (Proc. Symposium on Advances in Groundwater Hydrology, Chicago, IL 1976 ).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Boulton, N. S. and T. D. Streltsova. Unsteady Flow to a Pumped Well in a Fissured Water-Bearing Formation. J. Hydrol. 35 (1977) 257–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Boulton, N. S., and T. D. Streltsova. Unsteady Flow to a Pumped Well in an Unconfined Aquifer. J. Hydrol. 37 (1978) 349–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Boulton, N. S., and T. D. Streltsova. Unsteady Flow to a Pumped Well in an Unconfined Aquifer. J. Hydrol. 37 (1978) 349–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Streltsova, T. D. Buildup Analysis for Interference Tests in Stratified Formations. Paper SPE 10265 presented at the SPE 56th Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, TX, Oct. 5–7 (1981).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Streltsova, T. D. Well Pressure Behavior of a Naturally Fractured Reservoir. Paper SPE 10782, Proceedings of 1982 California Regional Meeting, San Francisco, March 24–26 (1982) 711–726.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Serra, K. V., Reynolds, A. C. and R. Raghavan. New Pressure Transient Analysis Methods for Naturally Fractured Reservoirs. Paper SPE 10780, Proceedings of the SPE California Regional Meeting, San Francisco, March 24–26 (1982) 673–692.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Prickett, T. A. Type-curve Solution to Aquifer Tests Under Water-Table Conditions. Ground Water, 3 (1965).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Walton, W. C. Ground Water Resource Evaluation (McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1970 ).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kruseman, G. P. and N. A. De Ridder. Analysis and Evaluation of Pumping Test Data (Wageningen, The Netherlands, Int. Inst. Land Reel. Impr. Bull 11, 1970 ).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Odeh, A. S. Unsteady-State Behavior of Naturally Fractured Reservoirs. Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 3 (1965) 60–64.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Adams, A. R., Ramey, H. J., Jr., and R. J. Burgess. Gas-Well Testing in a Fractured Carbonate Reservoirs. J. Pet. Technol. 20 (1968) 1187–1194.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Eagon, H. B., and D. E. Johe. Practical Solutions for Pumping Tests in Carbonate-Rock Aquifers. Ground Water 10 (1972) 6–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Streltsova-Adams, T. D. Well Hydraulics in Heterogeneous Aquifer Formations. In “Advances in Hydroscience ” (Ven Te Chow, ed) 11 (1978) 357–423.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Cooley, R. L. Numerical Simulation of Flow in an Aquifer Overlain by a Water Table Aquitard. Water Resour. Res. 8 (1972) 1046–1050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Herrera, I., and A. Minzoni. Theory of Flow in Unconfined Aquifers by Integrodifferential Equations. Water Resour. Res. 12 (1978) 291–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Premchitt, J. A Technique in Using Integrodifferential Equations for Model Simulation of Multiaquifer Systems. Water Resour. Res. 17 (1981) 162–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Herrera, I., and L. Rodarte. Integrodifferential Equations for Systems of Leaky Aquifers and Applications. 1, The Nature of Approximate Theories. Water Resour. Res. 9 (1963) 995–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Herrera, I., and R. Yates. Integrodifferential Equations for Systems of Leaky Aquifers and Applications. 3, A Numerical Method of Unlimited Applicability. Water Resour. Res. 13 (1977) 725–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Narasimhan, T. N. Multidimensional Numerical Simulation of Fluid Flow in Fractured Porous Media. Water Resour. Res. (to appear, 1982 ).Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Pruess, K., and T. N. Narasimhan. A Practical Method for Modeling Fluid and Heat Flow in Fractured Porous Media. Jour. Geophys. Res. (to appear, 1982 ). Paper SPE 10509 presented at the SPE Symposium on Reservoir simulation, New Orleans, Louisiana, Feb. 1–3, 1982.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Stehfest, H. Algorithm 358. Numerical Inversion of Laplace Transofrms. Communications of the ACM. 13 (1970) 47–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Luikov, A. V. Analytical Heat Diffusion Theory (Academic Press, 1968 ).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. D. Streltsova
    • 1
  1. 1.Exxon Production Research Co.HoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations