Skip to main content

Unified Analysis of Medical Imaging System SNR Characteristics

  • Chapter
Information Processing in Medical Imaging
  • 116 Accesses

Abstract

The ideal observer signal-to-noise ratio has been derived from statistical decision theory for all of the major medical imaging modalities. This yields a context for image performance assessment and instrumentation design and optimization. Measurements on human observers show that they can come close to ideal performance, except when the noise has negative correlations as in images reconstructed from projections. In this latter case they suffer a small but significant penalty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Sandrik JM, Wagner RF. Absolute measures of physical image quality. Measurement and application to radiographic magnification. Med. Phys. 9, 540 (1982).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wagner RF, Brown DG, and Pastel MS. The application of information theory to the assessment of computed tomography. Med. Phys. 6, 83 (1979).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Shaw R. Evaluating the efficiency of imaging processes. Rep. Prog. Phys. 41, 1103 (U.K. 1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wagner RF, Brown DG, and Metz CE. On the multiplex advantage of coded source/aperture photon imaging. Proc. of the Soc. of Photo-Opt. Instr. Engr. (SPIE, Bellingham WA) 314, 72 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hanson KM. Variations in task and the ideal observer. Proc. of the SPIE 419, (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Barrett HH, and Swindell W. Radiological Imaging: The theory of image formation, detection and processing. Two Vols. (New York: Academic Press 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Burgess AE, Wagner RF, Jennings RJ, and Barlow HB. Efficiency of human visual discrimination. Science 214, 93 (1981).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wagner RF. Decision theory and the detail SNR of Otto Schade. Photog. Sci. Eng. 22, 41 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Judy PF, Swensson RG, and Szulc M. Lesion detection and signal-to-noise ratio in CT images. Med. Phys. 8, 13 (1981).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hanson KM. Noise and contrast discrimination in computed tomography. [In] Technical Aspects of Computed Tomography, TH Newton DG Potts Eds., 3941 (CV Mosby, St. Louis 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Burgess AE, Jennings RJ, and Wagner RF. Statistical efficiency: A measure of human visual signal-detection performance. J. Appl. Photog. Engr. 8, 76 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Burgess AE, Wagner RF, and Jennings RJ. Human signal detection performance for noisy medical images. [In] Proc. IEEE ComSoc Int. Workshop Med. Imag., Asilomar, CA, Mar. 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wagner RF, Brown DG, Burgess AE, and Hanson KM. The observer SNR penalty for reconstructions from projections. Mag. Res. in Med. 1, (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Joseph PM, Hllal SK, Schulz RA, and Kelzc F. Clinical and experimental evaluation of a smoothed CT reconstruction algorithm. Radiology 134, 507 (1980).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wagner RF, Smith SW, Sandrik JM, and Lopez H. Statistics of speckle in ultrasound B-scans. IEEE Trans. SU-30, 156 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Smith SW, Wagner RF, Sandrik JM, and Lopez H. Low contrast detectability and contrast/detail analysis in medical ultrasound. IEEE Trans. SU-30, 164 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wagner RF, Brown DG, and Smith SW. Rician statistics and signal detectability in ultrasonic B-scans. Ultrasonic Imaging 5, 181 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hanson KM. Detectability in computed tomographic images. Med. Phys. 6, 441 (1979).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wagner RF and Jennings RJ. The bottom line in radiologic dose reduction. Proc. of the SPIE 206, 60 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jafroudi H, Muntz EP, Bernstein H, and Jennings RJ. Multiparameter optimization of mammography. Proc. of the SPIE 347, 75 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wagner, R.F., Brown, D.G. (1984). Unified Analysis of Medical Imaging System SNR Characteristics. In: Deconinck, F. (eds) Information Processing in Medical Imaging. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6045-9_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6045-9_32

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-6047-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-6045-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics