Advertisement

Viral Diagnosis by Electron Microscopy

  • June D. Almeida
Chapter
Part of the Current Topics in Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science book series (CTVM, volume 29)

Abstract

The electron microscope (EM) technique of negative staining has become an increasingly useful tool in the viral diagnostic field not only for reaching a primary diagnosis but also for corroborating the findings produced by more recent techniques. In carrying out negative staining attention to detail is important and this is discussed. The areas where negative staining can be most meaningfully employed are considered and three are delineated. These are, one, where no test based on serology exists, two, where the specimen has an unknown aetiology, and finally, in order to establish a diagnosis with problem specimens. Examples of each of these categories are given and illustrations provided.

Keywords

Negative Staining Faecal Specimen Virus Suspension Tungstic Acid Tissue Culture Supernatant 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Almeida, J.D. 1980. Practical aspects of diagnostic electron microscopy. Yale J. Biol. Med., 53, 5–18.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Almeida, J.D. 1983. Uses and Abuses of Diagnostic Electron Microscopy. In “Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology, Vol. 104” (Ed. M. Cooper, P.H. Hofschneider, H. Koprowski, F. Melchers, R. Rott, H.G. Schweiger, P.K. Vogt and R. Zinkernagel). (Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelburg). pp. 147–158.Google Scholar
  3. Bayer, M.E., Blumberg, B.S. and Werner, B. 1968. Particles associated with Australia antigen in the sera of patients with leukaemia, Down’s syndrome and hepatitis. Nature, 218, 1057.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Feinstone, S.M., Kapikian, A.Z. and Purcell, R.H. 1973. Hepatitis A detection by immune electron microscopy of a virus-like antigen associated with acute illness. Science, 182, 1026–1028.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Flewett, T.H., Davies, H., Bryden, A.S. and Robertson, M.J. 1974. Diagnostic electron microscopy of faeces, II. Acute gastroenteritis associated with reovirus-like particles. J. Clin. Pathol., 27, 603–614.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Goldwater, P.N., Chrystie, I.L. and Banatvala, J.E. 1979. Rotavirus and the respiratory tract. Br. Med. J., 2, 1551.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Haschemeyer, R.H. and Myers, R.J. 1972. Negative Staining. In “Principles and techniques of electron microscopy. Biological applications. Vol.2” (Ed. M.A. Hayat). (van Nostrand Reinhold, New York), pp. 101–147.Google Scholar
  8. Kapikian, A.Z., Wyatt, R.G., Dolin, R., Thornhill, T.S., Kalica, A.R. and Chanock, R.M. 1972. Visualisation by immune electron microscopy of a 27 nm particle associated with acute infectious nonbacterial gastroenteritis. J. Virol., 10, 1075–1081.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kapikian, A.Z., Kim, H.W., Wyatt, R.G., Rodringuez, W.J., Ross, S., Cline, W.L., Parrott, R.H. and Chanock, R.M. 1974. Reovirus-like agent in stools: association with infantile diarrhoea and development of serologic tests. Science, 185, 1049–1053.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lander, J.J., Alter, H.J. and Purcell, R.H. 1971. Frequency of antibody to hepatitis-associated antigen as measured by a new radioimmunoassay technique. J. Immunol., 106, 1166–1171.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Obert, G., Gloeckler, R., Burclard, J. and Van Regenmortel, M.H.V. 1981. Comparison of immunosorbant electron microscopy, enzyme immunoassay and counterimmunoelectrophoresis for detection of human rotavirus in stools. J. Virol. Methods, 3, 99–107.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ECSC, EEC, EAEC, Brussels-Luxembourg 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • June D. Almeida
    • 1
  1. 1.The Wellcome Research LaboratoriesBeckenham, KentEngland

Personalised recommendations