Evolutionary Biology, Human Nature, and Knowledge

  • Roger D. Masters
Part of the Synthese Library book series (SYLI, volume 180)

Abstract

Since major Western philosophers considered human knowledge and social values in terms of the natural science of their time, it is appropriate to assess the epistemological implications of the contemporary evolutionary theory colloquially known as “sociobiology.” Recent models of natural selection indicate the need to consider human social life in terms of five distinct areas of analysis: individual development (epigenesis), within-group variation, between-group variation, the hierarchical organization of complex systems, and feedback between systemic levels. In each of these domains, modern “social biology” has striking implications for traditional philosophic questions. While some positions, like those of the Sophists or of the English Empiricists, are seriously challenged by the findings of modern evolutionary biology, Aristotelian ethics and the dialectical tradition from Plato to Hegel appear to be reinforced to a surprising degree by contemporary biological theories.

Keywords

Human Nature Inclusive Fitness Social Biology Inclusive Fitness Theory Human Social Life 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander, Richard D.: 1979, Darwinism and Human Affairs, University of Washington Press, Seattle.Google Scholar
  2. Antiphon: 1923, Discours, Suivis des Fragments d’Antiphon le Sophiste (ed. Louis Gernet), Editions des Belles Lettres, Paris.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, P. W.: 1972, ‘More is Different’, Science 177, 393–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Axelrod, Robert: 1984, The Evolution of Cooperation, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Axelrod, Robert and Hamilton, William D.: 1981, ‘The Evolution of Cooperation’, Science 211, 1390–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barash, David: 1977, Sociobiology and Behavior, Elsevier, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Caplan, Arthur (ed.): 1978, The Sociobiology Debate, Harper & Row, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Capra, Fritjof: 1975, The Tao of Physics, Shambala, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  9. Cavalli-Sforza, Luigi L., and Feldman, M. W.: 1981, Cultural Transmission: A Quantitative Approach, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  10. Chase, Ivan: 1980, ‘Cooperative and Noncooperative Behavior in Animals’, American Naturalist 115, 827–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dobzhansky, Theodosius: 1966, Evolution, Genetics, and Man, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Durham, William: 1979, ‘Toward a Coevolutionary Theory of Human Biology and Culture’, in Napoleon Chagnon and William Irons (eds.), Evolutionary Biology and Human Social Behavior, Duxbury Press, North Scituate, Mass., pp. 39–59.Google Scholar
  13. Gould, Stephen J.: 1977, Ontogeny and Phylogeny, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  14. Gould, Stephen J.: 1981, The Mismeasure of Man, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  15. Gruter, Margaret and Bohannan, Paul (eds.): 1983, Law, Biology, and Culture, Ross Erikson, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
  16. Hamilton, William: 1964, ‘The Genetical Evolution of Social Behavior’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 7, 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heisenberg, Werner: 1952, Philosophic Problems of Nuclear Science, Faucett, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Heisenberg, Werner: 1958, Physics and Philosophy, Harper & Row, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Hirschleifer, Jack: 1980, ‘Evolutionary Models in Economics and Law: Cooperation versus Conflict Strategies’, UCLA Department of Economics Working Paper 170.Google Scholar
  20. Hjort, Johann: 1938, The Human Value of Biology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  21. Kuo, Zing-Yang: 1967, Dynamics of Behavior Development, Random House, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Lorenz, Konrad: 1965, Evolution and Modification of Behavior, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  23. Lorenz, Konrad: 1970–71, Studies in Animal and Human Behaviour, 2 vols., Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  24. Lumsden, Charles and Wilson, Edward O.: 1981, Genes, Mind, and Culture, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  25. Margolis, Howard: 1981, Selfishness, Altruism, and Rationality, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.Google Scholar
  26. Masters, Roger D.: 1970, ‘Genes, Language, and Evolution’, Semiotica 2, 295–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Masters, Roger D.: 1975, ‘Politics as a Biological Phenomenon’, Social Science Information 14, 7–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Masters, Roger D.: 1978, ‘Classical Political Philosophy and Contemporary Biology’, Paper presented to Conference for the Study of Political Thought, Chicago, Ill. (Politikos, in press).Google Scholar
  29. Masters, Roger D.: 1979, ‘Jean-Jacques is Alive and Well: Rousseau and Contemporary Sociobiology’, Daedalus (Summer), 93–105.Google Scholar
  30. Masters, Roger D.: 1980, ‘Hobbes and Locke’, in R. Fitzgerald (ed.), Comparing Political Thinkers, Pergamon, New York, pp. 116–40.Google Scholar
  31. Masters, Roger D.: 1981, ‘The Value — and Limits — of Sociobiology’, in Elliot White (ed.), Sociobiology and Human Politics, Lexington Books, Lexington, Mass., pp. 135–65.Google Scholar
  32. Masters, Roger D.: 1982, ‘Is Sociobiology Reactionary? The Political Implications of Inclusive Fitness Theory’, Quarterly Review of Biology 57, 215–92.Google Scholar
  33. Masters, Roger D.: 1983a, ‘The Biological Nature of the State’, World Politics 25, 161–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Masters, Roger D.: 1983b, ‘Social Biology and the Welfare State’, in Richard F. Tomasson (ed.), Comparative Social Research, 1983, JAI Press, Greenwich, Conn.Google Scholar
  35. Masters, Roger D.: 1984a, ‘Explaining “Male Chauvinism” and “Feminism”: Cultural Differences in Male and Female Reproductive Strategies’, in Meredith Watts (ed.), Biopolitics and Gender, Haworth Press, New York, pp. 165–210.Google Scholar
  36. Masters, Roger D.: 1984b, ‘Evolution and History in Political Thought from Aristotle to Marx’, Paper presented to Symposium on ‘Punctuated Equibria vs. Gradualism: Political Implications’, Annual Meeting of American Association for the Advancement of Science, New York, May 25, 1984.Google Scholar
  37. Maynard-Smith, John: 1978, ‘The Evoluton of Behavior’, Scientific American 239, 176–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mayr, Ernst: 1963, Animal Species and Evolution, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  39. Pattee, H. H. (ed.): 1913, Hierarchy Theory, Braziller, New York.Google Scholar
  40. Rosenberg, Alexander: 1980, Sociobiology and the Preemption of Social Science, Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  41. Ruse, Michael: 1979, Sociobiology: Sense or Nonsense? D. Reidel, Boston.Google Scholar
  42. Simpson, George G.: 1958, ‘The Study of Evolution: Methods and Present Status of Theory’, in A. Roe and G. G. Simpson (eds.), Behavior and Evolution, Yale University Press, New Haven, pp. 7–26.Google Scholar
  43. Stent, Gunther: 1972, ‘Cellular Communication’, Scientific American 227, 49–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Strauss, Leo: 1953, Natural Right and History, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  45. Tiersky, Ronald: 1980, ‘Confusion and Uncertainty in Comparative Polities’, Johns Hopkins University Bologna Center, Occasional paper 30.Google Scholar
  46. Trivers, Robert: 1974, ‘Parent-Offspring Conflict’, American Zoologist 14, 249–64.Google Scholar
  47. von Cranach, Mario (ed.): 1976, Methods of Inference from Animal to Human Behavior, Mouton., The Hague.Google Scholar
  48. von Cranach, Mario et al. (ed.): 1979, Human Ethology: Claims and Limits of a Discipline, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  49. Wheelwright, Philip (ed.): 1966, The Presocratics, Odyssey, New York.Google Scholar
  50. Whiting, J. W. M.: 1969, ‘Effects of Climate on Certain Cultural Practices’, in A. P. Vayda (ed.), Environment and Cultural Behavior, Natural History Press, Garden City, N.Y., pp. 416–55.Google Scholar
  51. Wilson, E. O.: 1975, Sociobiology: The New Synthesis, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roger D. Masters
    • 1
  1. 1.Dartmouth CollegeUSA

Personalised recommendations