Essential Oils and Aromatic Plants pp 3-21 | Cite as
Quantitative Aspects of Flavour Analysis by Equilibrium and Dynamic Head-Space Gas Chromatography with Capillary Columns
Abstract
Equilibrium (E-HSGC) and dynamic (D-HSGC) headspace sampling procedures with capillary columns are compared. Split injection is widely used in headspace gas chromatography (HSGC) since a homogeneous gas mixture is injected and non linear split behaviour is unknown here. Splitless injection is recommended if headspace sampling is combined with cold trapping in order not to disturb the equilibrium, since a large sample is withdrawn over a longer period. In this case the well established methods for quantitave analyses with E-HSGC can be applied. These methods, including sample identification by pattern recognition, calibration by the technique of standard addition and the procedure of multiple headspace extraction (MHE) are discussed. Problems with D-HSGC techniques, particularly concerning an exhaustive stripping of all the volatile constituents from the sample without loss of the highly volatile ones by breakthrough in the adsorption tube are discussed also. In cases of mixtures with a wide range of volatilities, where the sample transfer can hardly be quantitative, the application of the MHE principle is suggested as a possible solution.
Keywords
Splitless Injection Peak Size Headspace Vial Dynamic Headspace Aroma CompositionPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- (1).Wyllie SG, Alves S, Filsoof M, Jennings WG. 1978, in: Analysis of Food and Beverages (Charalambous G, Ed.), New York, Academic Press Inc., p. 1.Google Scholar
- (2).Closta W, Klemm H, Pospisil P, Riegger R, Siess G, Kolb B. 1983, Chromatography Newsletter 11:13, Perkin-Elmer.Google Scholar
- (3).Kuck M. 1980, in: Applied Headspace Gas Chromatography (Kolb B, Ed.), London, Heyden & Son Ltd., p. 12.Google Scholar
- (4).Kolb B, Auer M, Pospisil P. 1981, Applied Chromatography No. 35E, Ueberlingen, Bodenseewerk Perkin-Elmer & Co. GmbH.Google Scholar
- (5).Kolb B. 1984, in: Topics in Forensic and Analytical Toxicology (Maes RAA, Ed.), Amsterdam, Elsevier, p. 119.Google Scholar
- (6).Kolb B. 1984, in: Analysis of Food Contaminants (Gilbert J, Ed.), London and New York, Elsevier Applied Science Publishers Ltd., p. 117.Google Scholar
- (7).Bencsath FA, Drysch K, List D, Weichardt H. 1978, Applied Chromatography No. 32E, Ueberlingen, Bodenseewerk Perkin-Elmer & Co. GmbH.Google Scholar
- (8).Kolb B, Pospisil P. 1980, Applied Chromatography No. 33E, Ueberlingen, Bodenseewerk Perkin-Elmer & Co. GmbH.Google Scholar
- (9).Kolb B, Pospisil P. 1980, Chromatography Newsletter 8:35, Perkin-Elmer.Google Scholar
- (10).Pankow JF. 1983, J. High Resol. Chromatogr. & Chromatogr. Commun. 6:292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- (11).Deckert HG, Foelster U, Rueck A. 1984, Labor Praxis 8:130.Google Scholar
- (12).Hurrell RA. 1981, International Environment & Safety, June: 18.Google Scholar