Perceiving people through their movements

  • Sverker Runeson

Abstract

What can be known about a person from observing his or her movements? If there is to be any knowing at all of this kind there must exist relations of specificity between properties of movements and persons; movements must contain information about that which moves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ekman, P. and Friesen, W. V. (1969). Nonverbal leakage and clues to deception. Psychiatry, 32, 88–106PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ekman, P. and Friesen, W. V. (1974). Detecting deception from body or face. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 29, 288–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lippa, R. (1976). Expressive control and the leakage of dispositional introversion-extraversion during role-played teaching. J. Pers., 44, 541–59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gibson, J. J. (1950). The Perception of the Visual World. ( Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin )Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gibson, J. J. (1966). The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems. ( Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin )Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gibson, J. J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. ( Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin )Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee, D. N. (1974). Visual information during locomotion. In MacLeod, R. B. and Pick, H. L. (eds.) Perception: Essays in honor of James J. Gibson. pp. 250–67. ( Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press )Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lee, D. N. (1980). The optic flow field: the foundation of vision. Philosophical Trans. R. Soc. London, Series B, 290, 169–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lee, D. N. and Aronson, E. (1974). Visual proprioceptive control of standing in human infants. Perception Psychophys., 15, 529–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lishman, J. R. and Lee, D. N. (1973). The autonomy of visual kinesthesis. Perception, 2, 287–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lee, D. N. (1977). On the functions of vision. In Pick, H. L. and Saltzman, E. L. (eds.) Modes of Perceiving and Processing Information. pp. 159–70. ( Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum )Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Runeson, S. (1977). On the possibility of ‘smart’ perceptual mechanisms. Scand. J. Psychol., 18, 172–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Runeson, S. and Bingham, G. P. (1983). Sight and insights: contributions to the study of cognition from an ecological perspective on perception. Uppsala Psychological Reports (Serial No. 364)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Turvey, M. T., Shaw, R. E., Reed, E. S. and Mace, W. M. (1981). Ecological laws of perceiv-ing and acting: in reply to Fodor and Pylyshyn (1981). Cognition, 9, 237–304PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shaw, R. E. and Pittenger, J. B. (1977). Perceiving the face of change in changing faces: implications for a theory of object perception. In Shaw, R. E. and Bransford, J. D. (eds.) Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing, pp. 103–32. ( Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum )Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pittenger, J. B. and Shaw, R. E. (1975). Aging faces as viscal-elastic events: implications for a theory of nonrigid shape perception. J. Exp. Psychol.: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 374–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Turvey, M. T. (1977). Preliminaries to a theory of action with reference to vision. In Shaw, R. E. and Bransford, J. D. (eds.) Perceiving, Acting and Knowing: Towards and Ecological Psychology. pp. 211–65. ( Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum )Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Runeson, S. and Frykholm, G. (1983). Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis for person and action perception: expectation, gender recognition, and deceptive intention. J. Exp. Psychol.: Gen., 112, 585–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bernstein, N. (1974). The Co-ordination and Regulation of Movements. ( Oxford: Pergamon Press )Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kelso, J. A. S. (1982). Human motor behavior: an introduction. pp. 1–58, 237–87. (Hills¬dale, NJ: Erlbaum )Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kugler, P. N., Kelso, J. A. S. and Turvey, M. T. (1980). On the concept of coordinative structures as dissipative structures. I Theoretical lines of convergence. In Stelmach, G. E. and Requin, J. (eds.) Tutorials in Motor Behavior. pp. 3–47. ( Amsterdam: North-Holland )CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kelso, J. A. S., Holt, K. G., Kugler, P. N. and Turvey, M. T. (1980). On the concept of coordinative structures as dissipative structures. II Empirical lines of convergence. In Stelmach, G. E. and Requin, J. (eds.) Tutorials in Motor Behavior. pp. 49–70. ( Amsterdam: North-Holland )Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Turvey, M. T., Fitch, H. L. and Tuller, B. (1982). The Bernstein perspective. I. The problems of degrees of freedom and context conditioned variability. In Kelso, J. A. S. (ed.) Human Motor Behavior: An Introduction. pp. 239–52. ( Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum )Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tuller, B., Turvey, M. T. and Fitch, H. L. (1982). The Bernstein perspective. II. The concept of muscle linkage or coordinative structure. In Kelso, J. A. S. (ed.) Human Motor Behavior: An Introduction. pp. 253–70. ( Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum )Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Saltzman, E. L. and Kelso, J. A. S. (1983). Skilled actions: a task dynamic approach. Haskins Labs Status Reports Speech Research (Serial No. 76)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Johansson, G. (1973). Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception Psychophys., 14, 201–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Runeson, S. (1983). On visual perception of dynamic events (Originally published 1977). Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis: Studia Psychologica Upsaliensia (Serial No. 9)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Todd, J. T. and Warren, W. H. (1982). Visual perception of relative mass in dynamic events. Perception, 11, 325–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 39.
    Runeson, S. and Frykholm, G. (1981). Visual perception of lifted weight. J. Exp. Psychol.: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 733–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Krogman, W. M. (1962). The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine. (Springfield, 111.: C. C. Thomas )Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cutting. J. E. and Kozlowski, L. T. (1977). Recognizing friends by their walk: gait perception without familiarity cues. Bull. Psychonomic Soc., 9, 353–6Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kozlowski, L. T. and Cutting, J. E. (1977). Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display. Perception and Psychophysics, 21, 575–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Frykholm, G. (1983). Perceived identity. I Recognition of others by their kinematic patterns. Uppsala Psychological Reports (Serial No. 351 )Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Frykholm, G. (1983). Perceived identity. II. Learning to recognize others by their kinematic patterns. Uppsala Psychological Reports (Serial No. 352 )Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Belen’kii, V. Ye., Gurfinkel’, V. S. and Pal’tsev, Ye. I. (1967). Elements of control of voluntary movements. Biophysics, 12, 154–61Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Reed, E. S. (1982). An outline of a theory of action systems. J. Motor Behav., 14, 98–134Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Brehmer, B. (1984). Brunswikian psychology for the 1990’s. In Lagerspetz, K. M. J. and Niemi, P. (eds.) Psychology in the 1990’s: In honour of Johan von Wright. pp. 383 - 98. ( Amsterdam: North Holland )Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Runeson, S. (1974). Constant velocity — not perceived as such. Psychol. Res., 37, 3–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Runeson, S. (1983). Kinematic specification of dynamics, and dynamic event perception: their meaning and consequences. Presented at the 2nd International Conference on Event Perception, June 9–13, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TNGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Runeson, S. (1975). Visual prediction of collision with natural and nonnatural motion functions. Perception Psychophys., 18, 261–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Bingham, G. P. and Runeson, S. (1983). On describing what is perceived: seeing ‘velocity’ vs. seeing ‘push’ in moving objects. Presented at the Autumn Meeting of the International Society for Ecological Psychology, October 29, Trinity College, Hartford, CTGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© MTP Press Limited 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sverker Runeson

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations