Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of renal artery stenoses

  • P. E. Peters
  • V. Fiedler
  • J. Sciuk
  • A.-R. Fischedick
  • H. Vetter
Part of the Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine book series (DICM, volume 57)

Abstract

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTRA) is being used with increasing frequency for the treatment of renovascular hypertension and renal insufficiency caused by renal artery stenoses. The following article reviews the current status of PTRA regarding indications, technique, complications, and results of the procedure.

Keywords

Renal Artery Renal Artery Stenosis Renovascular Hypertension Left Renal Artery Fibromuscular Dysplasia 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cohn DJ, Sos TA Saddekni S, Srur MF (1984) Transluminal angioplasty for atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis. Seminars Interventional Radiology 1: 279–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Foster JH, Maxwell MH, Franklin SS et al (1975) Renovascular occlusive disease: results of operative treatment. JAMA 231: 1043–1048PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ingrisch H. Radiologische Therapie der Nierenarterien stenose durch perkutane transluminale Angioplastik (PTA). In: Arlart IP, Ingrish H (1984) Renovaskuläre Hypertonie. Stuttgart-New York: Georg Thieme Verlag, pp 72–94Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Levin DC (1984) Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of the renal arteries. JAMA 251: 759–763PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Martin LG, Price RB, Casarella WJ, Sones PJ, Wells JO, Zellmer RA et al (1985) Percutaneous angioplasty in clinical management of renovascular hypertension: initial and long—term results. Radiology 155: 629–633PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Maxwell MH, Bleifer KH, Franklin SS, Varady PD (1972) Cooperative study of renovascular hypertension: demographic analysis of the study. JAMA 220: 1195–1204PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Scherberich JE, Tuengerthal S, Kollath J, Riemann HE. Kontrastmitteltoxizität und Niere: Differenzierte Beurteilung durch tubulusspezifische Gewebsparameter. In: Riemann HE, Kollath J (Hrsg) (1985) Digitale Radiographic. Konstanz, Schnetztor-Verlag, pp 315–322Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schwarten DE (1984) Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of the renal arteries: intravenous digital subtraction angiography for follow—up. Radiology 150: 369– 373Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tegtmeyer CJ, Kofler TJ, Ayers A (1984) Renal angioplasty: current status. AJR 142: 17– 21Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tegtmeyer CJ, Kellum CD, Ayers C (1984) Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of the renal artery. Radiology 153: 77– 84Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tegtmeyer CJ, Tegtmeyer VL, Kellum CD, Dombrowski PJ, Lledo AM (1984) Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. The treatment of choice for vascular lesions caused by fibromuscular dysplasia. Seminars Interventional Radiology 1: 289– 300Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vetter W, Vetter H, Tenschert W, Kuhlmann U et al (1979) Renovaskuläre Hypertonie: Prog—nostischer Wert der seitengetrennten Reninbestimmung im Nierenvenenblut. Klin Wochensch 57: 863Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. E. Peters
  • V. Fiedler
  • J. Sciuk
  • A.-R. Fischedick
  • H. Vetter

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations