Continuous Fibre Reinforced Thermoplastics
Abstract
In continuous fibre reinforced plastics it is the fibre which determines the basic property profile: the function of the resin is to allow the fibre to develop its full potential by transferring the load from one fibre to another and, by providing a support, to prevent the fibre from buckling. From this standpoint it is clear that the best possible property profile will derive from the highest loading of the longest fibre, provided that each fibre is fully wetted by a resin of adequate stiffness to prevent buckling of the fibres when subjected to compressive loading. Further, we require that the resin shall maintain the ability to continue to transfer load from one fibre to its neighbours in a service environment.
Keywords
Carbon Fibre Injection Moulding Fibre Axis Continuous Fibre Property ProfilePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Orton, M. L ., ‘A new resin system for increased productivity in fibre composite processing’, International Conference on Fibre Reinforced Composites, Liverpool, 3 April 1984Google Scholar
- 2.Phillips, L. N., ‘The properties of carbon fibre reinforced thermoplastics moulded by the fibre stacking method’, RAE Technical Report 76140; Fabrication of Reinforced Thermoplastics by Means of the Film Stacking Technique, HMSO, London, 1980; Phillips, L. N. and Murphy, D. J. ‘Thermoplastic materials’, British Patent 1 570 000, 1980.Google Scholar
- 3.Hoggatt, J. T ., ‘Thermoplastic resin composites’, 20th National SAMPE Conference, as1975Google Scholar
- 4.Hartness, J. T., ‘Polyether etherketone matrix composites’, 14th National SAMPE Technical Conference, 1982, 14, 26; Hartness, J. T. and Kim, R. Y., ‘A comparative study of fatigue behaviour of polyether etherketone and epoxy reinforced with graphite cloth’, 28th National SAMPE Symposium, 1983, 535.Google Scholar
- 5.Hogan, PA, ‘The production and uses of film stacked composites for the aerospace industry’, SAMPE Conference, 1980Google Scholar
- 6.Lind, D. J., Coffey, V. J., ‘A method of manufacturing composite material’, British Patent 1 485 586, 1977.Google Scholar
- 7.Smith, HR, Continuous Production of Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastics Materials, World Intellectual Property Organization WO 83 /0285, 1983Google Scholar
- 8.Turton, N., McAinsh, J., ‘Thermoplastic compositions’, US Patent 3 785 916, 1974; McAinsh, J., ‘The reinforcement of polysulphones and other thermoplastics with continuous carbon fibre’, BPF 8th International Reinforced Plastics Conference, 1972Google Scholar
- 9.Johnston, N. J ., ‘Interlaminar fracture toughness of composites’, 28th National SAMPE Symposium, 1983, 502Google Scholar
- 10.British Patent 1 167 849, 1968; British Patent 1 302 048, 1970; US Patent 4037 011, 1977.Google Scholar
- 11.McMahon, P E., Maximovitch, M., ‘Development and evaluation of thermoplastic carbon fibre prepregs and composites’, Advances in Composite Materials, 1980, 2, 1663 ParisGoogle Scholar
- 12.Polymer Composites Incorporated, product demonstrated at exhibition attached to SAMPE Conference, Anahiem, 1983.Google Scholar
- 13.Price, R V., ‘Production of impregnated roving’, US Patent 3 742 106, 1973.Google Scholar
- 14.Ganga, R ., ‘La matrice ORGASOL dans les composites fibres’, paper presented at SITEF Conference, Toulouse, 1983Google Scholar
- 15.Chabrier, G., Moine, G. and Maurion, R, ‘Method for the manufacture of sections made of fiber containing thermoplastic resin’, World Intellectual Property Organisation WO 83 /0 1755, 1983.Google Scholar
- 16.Azdel’, Symalit Co. Ltd, Linzburg, Switzerland.Google Scholar
- 17.STX’, Allied Chemical Corporation, Morristown, New Jersey, USAGoogle Scholar
- 18.Belbin, G. R, Brewster, I., Cogswell, F. N., Hezzell, D. J. Swerdlow, M. S., ‘Carbon fibre reinforced polyether etherketone’, SAMPE Conference, Stresa, 1982; Aromatic Polymer Composite APC-1 ICI PLC, Welwyn Garden City, 1982Google Scholar
- 19.Fiberod’ Data Sheet, Polymer Composites Inc., Winona, USA, 1983.Google Scholar
- 20.Ryton’ PPS Carbon Fiber Composites, Phillips Petroleum Company, Bartlesville, USA, 1983.Google Scholar
- 21.Chabrier, G. M ., ‘Thermoplastic matrix unidirectional composites and their applications’, SAMPE Meeting Toulouse, 1983Google Scholar
- 22.Cordell, T. M ., Thermoplastic Composite Technology Development, AFWAL/ MLBC, Dayton, USA, 1983Google Scholar
- 23.Lind, D., Rolls Royce Ltd, Derby, private communication.Google Scholar
- 24.Clegg, D. W. Collyer, A A., in Mechanical Properties of Reinforced Thermoplastics, D. W. Clegg A. A Collyer (Eds), Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, London, 1986, Ch. 1Google Scholar
- 25.Hartness, JT ., University of Dayton, paper presented at SAMPE Conference, Reno, April 1984Google Scholar
- 26.Bishop, S., Curtis, P. and Dorey, G., RAE Technical Report 84061, RAE Farnborough, 1984.Google Scholar
- 27.Cogswell, F. N., ‘Microstructure and properties of thermoplastic Aromatic Polymer Composites’, 28th National SAMPE Symposium, 1983, 528.Google Scholar
- 28.Aromatic Polymer Composite APC-1, provisional data sheet, ICI PLC, Welwyn Garden City, 1983.Google Scholar
- 29.Blundell, DJ., Osborn, BN., ‘The morphology of poly(aryl-ether- ether-ketone)’, Polymer, 1983, 24, 953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Aromatic Polymer Composite (development grade), ICI PLC, Welwyn Garden City.Google Scholar
- 31.Drzal, LT ., ‘Composite interphase characterisation’, 28th National SAMPE Symposium, 1983, 1057Google Scholar
- 32.McMahon, P. E. Taggart, D. G., ‘Improved carbon fibre composite performance based on new fiber and matrix developments’, SAMPE Meeting Stresa, 1982Google Scholar
- 33.Chamis, C. C., ‘Prediction of fiber composite mechanical properties made simple’, 35th Annual Tech. Conf, Society of Plastics Industry, Section 12-A, 1980.Google Scholar
- 34.Leach, D. C. , Whale, M., private communication.Google Scholar
- 35.Bonnin, M. J., Dunn, C. M. R. Turner, S., Plastics and Polymers, 1969, 37, 517Google Scholar
- 36.Osborn, B. N., private communication.Google Scholar
- 37.Moore, D. R, private communication.Google Scholar
- 38.Leach, D. C., ‘The influence of a thermoplastic on the properties of structural composites’, Conference organised by the Institute of Metallurgists at the Royal Society, 1982.Google Scholar
- 39.Hooley, C. J. Turner, S., ‘Mechanical testing of plastics’, Automotive Engineer, June/July 1979, 48.Google Scholar
- 40.Jones, D. P., private communication.Google Scholar
- 41.Based on microscopy studies by Curson, A. D.Google Scholar
- 42.Byers, B. A, Behaviour of Damaged Graphite Epoxy Laminates under Compression Loading NASA Contract Report 159293, 1980.Google Scholar
- 43.Whitney, J. M., Browning, C. E. Hoogsteder, W., ‘A double cantilever beam test for characterising mode one delamination of composite materials’, J. Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 1982, 1 (4), 297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 44.Carlile, D. R Leach, D. C., ‘Damage and notch sensitivity of graphite/ PEEK composite’, SAMPE Conference, Cincinatti, 1983.Google Scholar
- 45.Hall, M., Rolls Royce Ltd, Derby, private communication.Google Scholar
- 46.Cogswell, FN. Hopprich, M., ‘Environmental resistance of carbon fibre reinforced polyether etherketone’, Composites, 1983, (3), 251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 47.Briggs, P. J., Fire Properties of Aromatic Polymer Composite (APC-1) ICI PLC, Corporate Fire Laboratory, Blackley, private communication.Google Scholar
- 48.Brewster, I. Cattanach, J. B., ‘Fabrication with thermoplastic Aromatic Polymer Composite’, SAMPE Meeting, London, 1983Google Scholar
- 49.Poveromo, L. M., Muench, W. K., Marx, W. Lubin, G., ‘Composite beam builder’, SAMPE J, Jan. 1981, 7.Google Scholar
- 50.Cattanach, J. B., private communication.Google Scholar
- 51.Addleman, R. L., Brewster, I. Cogswell, F. N., ‘Continuous fibre reinforced thermoplastics’, BPF 13th Reinforced Plastics Congress, 1982.Google Scholar