Application of ANE value and of shares of individual elements in this value for determining the difference between various plant species

  • A. Ostrowska
Chapter
Part of the Developments in Plant and Soil Sciences book series (DPSS, volume 27)

Summary

The content of nutrients in the leaves in various plant species was defined as a sum of many elements in the mass (ANE-Accumulation Nutritional Elements in meq per kg d.m.) and as the share of individual elements in ANE. Attention is also paid to some factors that determine the element accumulation in plant leaves, It has been found that ANE values for several plant species under study range from about 1500–2000 in pine needles. 2000–3000 in most deciduous trees. 3000–5000 in cultivated plants and are higher for vegetables. The nitrogen share in ANE is 60–70%. while of the remaining elements, the share of individual elements differs between the Mono- and Dicotyledoneous plants. The ANE value turned out to be characteristic of the individual plant species or groups of species as well as of their nutrition status and leaf age. In general, the difference between plant species appear mainly in the ANE value, while the distribution of elements within this value in the leaves of various plant species are similar

Key words

ANE Nutrients Plant species 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bartos O L and Johnston R S 1978 Biomass and nutrient content of quaking aspen at two sites in the western United States. Q. Forest. Sci. 24, 273–280.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bowersox T W and Ward W W 1977 Seasonal variation in foliar nutrient concentration of black cherry. Q. Forest. Sci. 23, 429–432.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bowersox T W and Ward W W 1977 Soil fertility, growth and yield of young hybrid poplar plantation in central Pennsylvania. Q. Forest. Sci. 23, 163–169.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brogowski Z i Czarnowska K 1985 Stan jonowy 2 odmian pszenicy w różnych fazach rozwojowych na tie nawożenia azotowego. Rocz. Nauk Roln. in publish.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brogowski Z, Czerwinski Z i Pracz J 1977 Stan równowagi jonowej a adporność drzew i krzewow parkowych na NaCl. Rocz. Naukl Roln. A. 102.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Camp P J, Huber S C, Burke J J and Moreland O E 1982 Biochemical changes of occur during senescence of wheat. Plant Physiol. 70 1641–1646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chapin F S 1983 Adaptation of selected trees and grasses to low availability of phosphorus. Plant and Soil 72, 283–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chino M 1981 Species differences in calcium and potassium distribution within plants roots. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 27, 487–503.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Clark R B 1983 Plant genotype differences in uptake, translocation, accumulation, and use of mineral elements required for plant growth. Plant and Soil 72, 175–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cleve K, Oliver L, Schlentner R, Viereck L A and Dyrnes C T 1983. Productivity and nutrient cycling in taiga forest ecosystems. Can. J. Forest Res. 13, 747–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Coyne P J and Cleve K V 1977 Fertilizer inducer morphological and chemical responses of a quaking aspen stand in interior Alaska. Q. Forest. Sci. 23, 92–192.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dejaegere R, Neirinckx L, Stassart J M and Delegher V 1981 Mechanism of ion uptake across barley roots. Plant and Soil 63, 19–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gabelman W H and Gerloff G C 1983 The search for and interpretation of genetic controls that enhance plant growth under deficiency levels of macronutrient. Plant and Soil 72, 335–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gladysz A 1985 Zmienność zawartośći skladników pokarmowych w liściach sadzonek osiki w zaleznośći od miejsca ich wystepowania na pedzie. Prace IBL In press.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gladysz A. Janson L i Szczubialka Z 1977 Zawartość skladników pokarmowych w liśćiach dwuletniej osiki. Sylwan 3, 21–32.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Harvey E and Kennedy J R 1981 Foliar nutrient concentration and hardwood growth influenced by cultural treatments. Plant and Soil 63, 307–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hecht-Buchholz Ch 1983 Light and electron microscopic investigation of the reactions of various genotypes to nutritional disorders. Plant and Soil 72, 151–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Horst W J 1983 Factors responsible for genotypic manganese tolerance in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). Plant and Soil 72, 213–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hom J L and Oechel W C 1983 The photosynthetic capacity, nutrient content, and nutrient use efficiency of different needle age classes of black spruce (Picea mariana) found in interior Alaska. Can. J. Forest. 13, 834–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Insley H, Boswell R C and Gardiner J B H 1981 Foliar macronutrients (N, p, K, Ca, Mg) in lime (Tilia spp). II. Seasonal variation. Plant and Soil 61, 391–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Insley H, Boswell R C and Gardiner J B H 1981 Foliar macronutrients (N, P, K, Ca, Mg) in lime (Tilia spp). I. Sampling techniques. Plant and Soil 61, 377–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jain R K, Grag V K and Khanduja S D 1981 Macronutrient element composition of leaves from some ornamental shrubs grown in normal and alcali soil. J. Hortic. Sci. 56, 169–171.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jeschke W D 1983 Cation fluxes in excised and intact roots in relation to specific and varietal differences. Plant and Soil 72, 197–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kowalkowski A 1980 Rola karagany w ksztaltowaniu pokrywy glebowej suchego stepu centralnej Mongolii. Rocz. glebozn. XXXI, 133–150.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kramer D 1983 Genetically determined adaptations in roots to nutritional stress: correlation of structure and function. Plant and Soil 72, 167–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kurczewski H 1981 Wplyw wysokich dawek nawozów mineralnych na plony i sklad chemiczny wybranych roslin warzywnych w zaleznosci od nawozenia organicznego. Pr. doktorska SGGW-AR, Warszawa.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lea R, Tierson W C, Bickelhaupt D H and Leaf A L 1980 Differential foliar responses of northern hardwoods to fertilization. Plant and Soil 54, 419–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Leech R T and Kim Y T 1981 Foliar analysis and DRIS as a guide to fertilizer amendments. Forest. Chronic. 57, 17–21.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Loughman B C, Roberts S C and Goodwin-Bailey 1983 Varietal differences in physiological and biochemical responses to change in ionic environment. Plant and Soil 72, 245–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mengel K and Kirby E A 1983 Podstawy Zywienia Roslin. PWRiL, Warszawa, 80–83.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mengel K 1983 Response of various crop species and cultivars to fertilizer application. Plant and Soil 72, 305–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Moszynska B and Tatur A 1978 Characteristics of the process of decaying of grass leaves. Pol. Ecol. Stud. 4, 143–150.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Moraczewski R i Niczyporuk A 1979 Przydatnosc rolnicza niektorych gatunkow traw i roslin motylkowych do produkcji pasz na lace umiarkowanie mokrej. Rocz. Nauk Roln. A-104, 95–112.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Nebe W und Rzeznik Z 1982 Zur Ernährung der Lärche im 11-jährigen Provenienzversuch Siemianice. Forstwirtschaf. I.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Nielsen N E and Schjorring J K 1983 Efficiency and kinetics of phosphorus uptake from soil by various genotypes. Plant and Soil 72, 255–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Nowosielski O 1972 Zasady Opracowywania Zalecen Nawozowych w Ogrodnictwie. PWN, Warszawa.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ostrowska A 1980 Dynamika skladnikow w iglach sosny zwyczajnej Pinus silvestris. Roczn. glebozn. XXXI, 43–51.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ostrowska A 1985 Wplyw warunków żywienia na uk lady jon owe w roslinach na przykladzie sosny zwyczajnej (Pinus silvestris L.) — Effect of nutritional conditions on the ionic systems in plants on the base of pine. Skierniewice 25/85.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ostrowska A, Szczubiallka Z i Gawlinski S 1982 Pinivit — wieloskladnikowy plynny nawóz do nawozenia dolistnego roslin iglastych. IBL, Warszawa, 1–58.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Petersson S and Jensen P 1983 Variation among species and varieties in uptake and utilization of potassium. Plant and Soil 72, 231–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Popp M 1983 Genotypic differences in the mineral metabolism of plants adapted to extreme habitats. Plant and Soil 72, 261–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Saric M R 1983 Theoretical and practical approaches to the genetic specifity of mineral nutrition of plants. Plant and Soil 72, 137–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Smith G S, Goold G J, Johnston C M and Upsdell M 1982 Water use and chemical composition of ryegrass (Lolium) cultivars. Plant and Soil 69, 21–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Summer M E 1981 Diagnosing the sulfur requirement of corn and wheat using foliar analysis. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 45, 87–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sžcubialka Z Zawartość azotu i skladników mineralnych w iglach jako podstawa oceny stanu zaopatrezenia sosny zwyczajnej (Pinus silvestris L.) w skladniki pokarmowe. Pr. dokt. SGGWAR, Warszawa.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Terry N and Huston R P 1975 Effects of calcium on the photosynthesis of intact leaves and isolated chloroplasts of sugar beets. Plant Physiol. 55, 923–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Wittwer R F and Immel M J 1980 Chemical composition of five deciduous tree species in four-year-old, closely spaced plantations. Plant and Soil 54, 461–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Ostrowska
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Soil and FertilizationForest Research InstituteWarszawaPoland

Personalised recommendations