Methodological Individualism and Institutional Individualism
My aim in the present essay is to argue that individualism need not be psychologistic, and to defend institutionalistic individualism, which I consider to be Popper’s great contribution to the philosophy of the social sciences.
KeywordsHuman Nature Social Contract Social Phenomenon Ideal Type Institutional Reform
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Max Weber, spiBasic Concepts of Sociology, translated by H. P. Secher, New York, Citadel Press, 1962, para. I, 9.Google Scholar
- 2.For further details see my ‘Conventions of Knowledge in Talmudic Law’ in Bernard S. Jackson (ed.), Studies in Jewish Legal History in Honor of David Daube. Jewish Chronicle Publ., London, 1974; also published as full issue of J. Jewish Studies, vol. 25, no. I (February 1974), pp. 16–34.Google Scholar
- 4.The Strange Face of Evil’, The Listener, September 30, 1954, Vol. 52, pp. 522–3.Google Scholar
- 5.L. Pearce Williams, The Politics of Science in the French Revolution’, Paper Ten, Critical Problems in the History of Science, Ed. Marshall Clagett, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, 1959.Google Scholar
- 6.‘Explanations in History’, Proceedings of the Aritotelian Society, Supp. vol. 30, 1956. Reprinted in Theories of History, ed. Patrick Gardiner, 1959. See also ‘Reply to Mr. Watkins’, printed at the very end of that volume.Google Scholar
- 7.‘Ideal Types and Historical Explanation’, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 3, 9, 1952, p. 40, reprinted in Readings in the Philosophy of Science, edited by H. Feigl and M. Brodbeck, N.Y., 1953, p. 741, and in J. O’Neill, ed., Modes of Individualism and Collectivism, London, 1973.Google Scholar
- 8.Watkins, ‘Historical Explanation in the Social Sciences’, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 7, 30, 1957, p. 112 n., reprinted in Theories of History, ed. Patrick Gardiner, 1959, pp. 509–10 n, and in O’Neill, op. cit., n. 7 above.Google Scholar