An Elementary Proof of the Peters-Ritchie Theorem

  • Emmon Bach
  • William Marsh
Part of the Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy book series (SLAP, volume 33)

Abstract

The mathematical results about various classes of transformational grammars continue to play a role in linguistic discussions. Peters and Ritchie (1973a) proved that transformational grammars of the “standard” sort with a context-sensitive base were equivalent to unrestricted rewriting systems (equivalently, Turing machines) in their weak generative capacity, that is, that there was such a grammar for every recursively enumerable language. The proof can be presented informally and is easy to grasp (see Bach, 1974, for an informal presentation of the proof).

Keywords

Turing Machine Deep Structure Informal Presentation Transformational Grammar Blocking Symbol 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bach, Emmon (1974). Syntactic Theory. New York.Google Scholar
  2. Chomsky, Noam (1973). ‘Conditions on Transformations.’ In Stephen R. Anderson and Paul Kiparsky, eds., A Festschrift for Moris Halls.Google Scholar
  3. Cullicover, Peter and Kenneth Wexler (1977). ‘Some Syntactic Implications of a Theory of Language Learnability.’ In P. W. Culicover, T. Wasow, and A. Akmajian: eds., Formal Syntax. New York.Google Scholar
  4. Davis, Martin (1968). Computability and Unsolvability.. New York.Google Scholar
  5. Hamburger, Henry and Kenneth N. Wexler (1973). ‘Identifiability of a Class of Transformational Grammars.’ In K. J. J. Hintikka, J. M. E. Moravcsik, and P. Suppes, eds., Approaches to Natural Language. Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  6. Peters, P. S., Jr. and R. W. Ritchie (1971). ‘On Restricting the Base Component of Transformational Grammars.’ Information and Control, 18: 483–501.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Peters, Stanley and R. W. Ritchie (1973a). ‘On the Generative Power of Transformational Grammars.’ Information Science, 6: 49–83.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Peters, P. Stanley Jr., and R. W. Ritchie (1973b). ‘Nonfiltering and Local-filtering Transformational Grammars.’ In K. J. Hintikka, J. M. E. Moravcsik, and P. Suppes, eds., Approaches to Natural Language. Dordrecht.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emmon Bach
  • William Marsh

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations