Advertisement

The Impact of Acidification on Aquatic Biota in North America: A Comparison of Field and Laboratory Results

  • G. Mierle
  • K. Clark
  • R. France
Conference paper

Abstract

Acidification of lakes and streams can lead to adverse effects on aquatic biota, and the recognition of widespread atmospheric deposition of strong acids in eastern North America has led to considerable concern over its existing and potential impact on th flora and fauna of sensitive (i.e. low alkalinity) systems. While most of the concern has been directed toward the impact on the fisheries resource, it is well documented that all levels of biota are affected (Almer et al., 1974; Likens et al., 1983; Dillon et al., 1984), and full appreciation of the impact of acidification requires examination of all living components of the aquatic ecosystem. Although extensive work has already been conducted in the Scandinavian countries, there are numerous differences in species between those countries and North America, and a sound appraisal of the threat to North American biota requires comparable work for this continent. Large scale surveys and monitoring programs are under development or are in the early phases of execution by various institutions, but much has already been learned from laboratory and field acidification experiments, and from comparisons of acidic and non-acidic lakes and streams. The purpose of this paper is to compare the results of these studies for several dominant species from several major groups of organisms. We hope to focus attention on the nature and quality of information about the sensitivity of organisms with known or apparent significant ecological roles, identify gaps or weaknesses, and provide insight into the merits and limitations of the various methods of study.

Keywords

North America Aquatic Biota Filamentous Alga Acute Toxicity Test Acid Lake 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Almer, B., Dickson, W., Ekstrom, C. and Hornstrom, E.: 1974, Ambio 3, 30.Google Scholar
  2. Berrill, M., Hollett, L., Margosian, A., and Hudson, J.: 1985, Can. J. Zool 63, 2586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blouin, A.C., Lane, P.A., Collins, T.M. and Kerekes, J.J.: 1984, Int. Revue ges Hydrobiol 69, 819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowen, M.S., and Ward, H.B.: Micro Lett 6: 77.Google Scholar
  5. Carter, J.C.H., Dadswell, M.J., Roff, J.C. and Sprules, W.G.S 1980, Can. J. Zool 58, 1355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clark, K.L.: 1986a, Can. Field Natur., in press.Google Scholar
  7. Clark, K.L .: 1986b, Distributions of anuran populations in central Ontario to habitat acidity. Int. Symp. on Acidic Precipitation, Sept 15–20, 1985.Google Scholar
  8. Clark, K.L. and Hall, R.J.: 1985, Can. J. Zool 63, 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clark, K.L. and LaZerte, B.D.: 1985, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 42, in press.Google Scholar
  10. Confer, J.L., Kaaret, T. and Likens, G.E.: 1983, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci 40, 36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Conroy, N., Hawley, K., Keller, W. and LaFrance, C.: 1975, influences of the atmosphere on lakes in the Sudbury area, in: Proc. First Specialty Symp. on Atmospheric Contribution to the Chemistry of Lake Waters. Internat. Assoc. Great Lakes Res., 28 Sept.–1 Oct. 1975, 146.Google Scholar
  12. Conway, H.L. and Hendrey, G.R.: 1982, Ecological effects of acid precipitation on primary producers1, in: Acid Precipitation, Effects on Ecological Systems (F.M. D’ltr., ed.) Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor, 506 pp.Google Scholar
  13. Crisman, T.L., Schulze, R.L., Brezonik, P.L., and Bloom, S.A.: 1980, ‘Acid precipitation: the biotic responses in Florida lakes’, in: Ecological Impact Acid Precipitation ( Drablos, D. and Tollan, A., eds.) SNFS Project, Oslo.Google Scholar
  14. Dale, JVM., Freedman, B. and Kerekes, J.: 1985, Can. J. Zool 63, 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davies, I.J .: 1986, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 43, in press.Google Scholar
  16. DesGranges, J.L .: 1985, ‘Why do some ducks avoid acid lakes while others don’t?1, Int. Symp. on Acidic Precipitation, Sept 15™20, 1985. p. 146 (Abstract)Google Scholar
  17. Dillon, P.J., Yan, N.D., and Harvey, H.H.: 1984, CRC Crit. Rev. Environ. Control 13, 167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dodson, S.I.: 1981, ‘Morphological variation of Daphnia pulex Leydig ( Crustacea: Cladocera) and related species from North America’.Google Scholar
  19. Fox, J.L., Odlaug, T.O. and Olson, T.A.: 1969, The Ecology of Periphyton in Western Lake Superior, Wat. Resources Res. Center Bull. 14, Univ. of Minn., 127 pp.Google Scholar
  20. France, R.L .: 1985, Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., in press.Google Scholar
  21. France, R.L .: 1986, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., in press.Google Scholar
  22. France, R.L. and Graham, L.: 1985, Water, Air, Soil Pollut. 26, 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. France, R.L. and Stokes, P.M.: 1986, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., in press.Google Scholar
  24. Gensemer, R.W. and Kilham, S.S.: 1984, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci 41, 1240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Glooshenko, V., Weller, W. and Eastwood.: 1985, ‘Amphibian abundance and distribution with respect to environmental contaminants and pH stress adjacent to Sudbury, Ontario’, Technical Report, Wildlife Branch, Ont. Min. of Nat. Res.Google Scholar
  26. Hall, R.J., Likens, G.E., Fiance, S.B., and Hendrey, G.R., 1980; Ecol. 61, 976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Havas, M. and Likens, G.E.: 1985, Can. J. Zool 63, 1114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Havens, K. and DeCosta, J.: 1985, Hydrobiol. 122, 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jackson, M.: 1985, ‘Filamentous algae in Ontario softwater lakes’, Int. Symp. on Acidic Precipitation, Sept 15–20, 1985. p. 117–118 (Abstract)Google Scholar
  30. Joubert, G. and Tousignant, L.: 1981, The Effect of pH on the Distribution of Crustacean Zooplankton in 158 Quebec Lakes, Manuscript rep., Ministere de l’Environement du Quebec. 24 pp.Google Scholar
  31. Keller, W .: 1981, Planktonic Crustacea hi Lakes of the Greater Sudbury Area, Ontario Ministry of the Environment. Tech. Rep. 33 pp. plus appendices.Google Scholar
  32. Kling, H.J., and Holmgren, S.K.: 1972, ‘Species composition and seasonal distribution of phytoplankton in the Experimental lakes Area, Northwestern Ontario’, Fish. Res. Bd. Canada, Tech. Rep 337, 56 pp.Google Scholar
  33. Kwiatkowski, R.E. and Roff, J.C.: 1976, Can. J. Bot 54, 2546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. MacKay, R.J. and Kersey, K.E.: 1985, Hydrobiol. 122, 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mackie, G.L. and Flippance, L.A.: 1983, Freshwat. Invertebr. Biol 2, 48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Malley, D.F.: 1980, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci 37, 237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Moss, B.S 1973, J. Ecol 61, 157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Muller, P.: 1980, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci 37, 355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nakamoto, L., Heintsch, L. and Nicholls, K.: 1983, ‘Phytoplankton of lakes in the Muskoka-Haliburton area’, Ontario Ministry of the Environ. Data Report DR 83 /8, 44 pp.Google Scholar
  40. Nero, R.W. and Schindler, D.W.: 1983, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci 40, 1905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nicholls, K.H., Beaver, J.L. and Estabrook, R.H.: 1982, Hydrobiol. 96, 91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nilssen, J.P.: 1974, Norsk ent. Tidsskv 21, 37.Google Scholar
  43. NRCC: 1981, Acidification in the Canadian Aquatic Environment: Scientific Criteria For Assessing the Effects of Acidic Deposition on Aquatic Ecosystems’, Publications No. 18475 of the National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, 369 pp.Google Scholar
  44. Okland, J.: 1980a, ‘Environment and snails (Gastropoda): Studies of 1,000 lakes in Norway’, in: Ecological Impacts of Acid Precipitation ( Drablos, D. and Tollan, A., eds.), SNSF Project, Oslo.Google Scholar
  45. Okland, K.A.: 1980b, ‘Mussels and crustaceans: studies of 1,000 lakes in Norway’, in: Ecological Impacts of Acid Precipitation ( Drablos, D. and Tollan, A., eds.), SNSF Project, Oslo.Google Scholar
  46. Pierce, B.A., Hoskins, J.B. and Epstein, E.: 1984, J. Herpet 18, 159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Post, J.R. and Cucin, D.: 1984, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci 41, 1496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pough, F.H.: 1976, Sci. 192, 68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pough, F.H. and Wilson, R.E. 1977, Air and Soil Poll. 7, 307.Google Scholar
  50. Roff, J.C., Spruies, W.G., Carter, J.C.H. and Dadsweli, M.J.: 1981, ‘The structure of crustacean Zooplankton communities in glaciated eastern North America’.Google Scholar
  51. Rooke, J.B. and Mackie, G.L.: 1984a, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci 41, 777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rooke, J.B. and Mackie, G.L.: 1984b, Can. J. Zool 62, 1474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schindler, D.W., Mills, K.H., Malley, D.F., Findlay, D.L., Shearer, J.A., Davies, I.J., Turner, M.A., Lindsey, G.A., Cruikshank, D.R.: 1985, Sci. 228, 1395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Servos, M.R.: 1983, The Effect of Short and Long Termed Acidification on Selected Molluscs of South-Central Ontario. M.Sc. thesis, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ont.Google Scholar
  55. Servos, M.R., Rooke, J.B. and Mackie, G.L.: 1985, Can. J. Zool 63, 511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Siegfried, C.A., Sutherland, J.W., Quinn, S.O. and Bloomfield, J.A.: 1984, Verh. Interat. Verein. Limnol 22, 549.Google Scholar
  57. Singer, R .: 1984, ‘Benthic organisms’, In The Acidic Deposition Phenomenon and Its Effects, Vol. II Effects Sciences (Altshuller, A.P. and Linthurst, R.A., eds.) U.S. Envir. Prot. Agency Report EPA-600/8-83-016BF.Google Scholar
  58. Sprules, G.W.: 1975, J. Fish. Res. Board Can 32, 389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Stephenson, M. and Mackie, G.L.: 1986, Can. J. Fish. Aquatic Sci., in press.Google Scholar
  60. Stockner, J.G.: 1971, J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can 28, 265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Stokes, P.M .: 1981, ‘Benthic algal communities in acid lakes’, in Effects of Acid Precipitation on Benthos ( Singer, R., ed.). North America Benthological Society, Hamilton, N.Y.Google Scholar
  62. Turner, P.A.E. and Stokes, P.M.: 1985, ‘The growth of filamentous algae (Mougeotia spp.) isolated from acidic lakes grown over a pH gradient from 4.5 to 6.9’, Int. Symp. on Acidic Precipitation, Sept. 15–20, 1985. p. 120 (Abstract)Google Scholar
  63. Walton, W.E., Compton, S.M., Allan, J.D., Daniels, R.E.: 1982, Can. J. Zool 60, 573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wehr, J.D., and Brown, L.M.: 1985, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 42, in press.Google Scholar
  65. Wehr, J.D., Brown, L.M. and O’Grady, K.: 1985, Can. J. Bot, in press.Google Scholar
  66. Yan, N.D.: 1979, Wat., Air, Soil Pollut 11, 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Yan, N.D., and Geiling, W.: 1985, Hydrobiol. 120, 199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Yan, N.D., Nero, R.W., Keller, W. and Lasenby, D.C.: 1985, Holarctic Ecol. 8, 93.Google Scholar
  69. Yan, N.D. and Strus, R.: 1980, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci 37, 2282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zischke, J.A., Arthur, J.W., Nordie, K.J., Hermanutz, R.O., Standen, D.A., and Henry, T.: 1983, Water Res. 17, 47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Mierle
    • 1
  • K. Clark
    • 2
  • R. France
    • 3
  1. 1.Dorset Research CentreOntario Ministry of the EnvironmentDorsetCanada
  2. 2.Biota Environmental ContractorsDorsetCanada
  3. 3.Institute of Environment StudiesUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations