Advertisement

Ultrastructural studies on the early cuticular metamorphosis of adult female Lernaeocera branchialis (L.) (Copepoda, Pennellidae)

  • Jane A. Smith
  • Philip J. Whitfield
Conference paper
  • 215 Downloads
Part of the Developments in Hydrobiology book series (DIHY, volume 47)

Abstract

After its final moult and fertilization an adult female of the marine fish-parasitic copepod. Lernaeocera branchialis, begins an extensive metamorphosis. This commences while the parasite is still on the flounder intermediate host and is completed once the female has established itself on the whiting final host. One early component of the metamorphosis is a considerable elongation of the parasite’s abdominal region. S.e.m. and t.e.m. studies have revealed that part of the mechanism of the elongation consists of a straightening out of a highly folded abdominal cuticle. Before fertilization, the epicuticle and outer procuticular layers of this integument are thrown into a series of transverse, 4–6 μm deep pleats or folds with a density of 1–1.2 folds/μm of abdominal length. Straightening these folds can generate an approximately 6-fold length increase. The folds arc already present beneath the female chalimus IV cuticle when the epidermis of this development stage starts to secrete the adult cuticle. Immediately before the final moult, the adult cuticle is super-folded with the whole cuticle displaying second-order folds, 8–10 /μm deep.

The capacity of Lernaeocera to engage in extensive cuticular modifications without recourse to a moult is compared with similar abilities shown by some insect species.

Key words

Copepoda Lernaeocera branchialis metamorphosis cuticle ultrastructure epicuticle 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Benet-Clark, H.C., 1962. Active control of the mechanical properties of insect endocuticle. J. Insert Physiol. 8: 627–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bnnet-Clark, H. C, 1963. The relation between epicuticular folding and subsequent size of an insect J Insert Physiol 9 4. 1–46.Google Scholar
  3. Bordereau. M. C, 1967. Cuticle intersegmentaire des imagos de Termites superieurs (Isoptera. Termatidae ): Dimorphisme sexuel, ulstrastructure, relations avec la physiogastrie de la reine. C. Acad. Sci. Paris. Ser. D 265: 1997–2000.Google Scholar
  4. Bresciani, J., 1986. The fine structure of the integument of free-living and parasitic copepods a review Acta zool. 67: 125–145.Google Scholar
  5. Evans, N. A.. Whitfield. P. J.. Bamber, K. N. & P. M. Espin, 1982. Lernaeocera lusci (Copepoda: Pennellidae) on bib, Trisopterus luscus, from Southampton Water. Parasitology 86: 161–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kabata, Z.., 1979. Parasitic Copepoda of British Fishes. Ray Society, London, 468 ppGoogle Scholar
  7. Kabata, Z.. 1981. Copepoda ( Crustacea) parasitic on fish: Problems and perspectives. Adv. Parasit. 19: 1–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Locke, M.. 1964. The structure and formation of the integument in insects. In M. Rockstein (ed.). The Physiology of the Insecta. 3. Academic Press, London 380–466.Google Scholar
  9. Schram, T. A.. 1979 The life history of the eye-maggot of the sprat, Lernaeenicus sprattae (Sowerby) ( Copepoda, Ler- naeoceridae). Sarsia 64: 279–316.Google Scholar
  10. Slinn, D. J.. 1970. An infestation of adult lernaeocera (Copepoda)on wild sole, Solea solea, kept under hatchery conditions. J mar. biol. Ass UK 50: 787–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sproston, N G. & P H. T Hanky. 1941. The ecology of some parasitic copepods of gadid and other fishes. J. mar. biol. Ass. UK 25: 361–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Whitfield, P J. Pilcher. M.. Grant. H. J. &. T. Riley. 1988. Experimental studies on the development of Lernaeocera branchialis: population processes from egg production to maturity on the flatfish host. Hydrobiologia (this volume).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jane A. Smith
    • 1
  • Philip J. Whitfield
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biology, King’s College (KQC)University of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations