Guanidinium as a Probe of the Gramicidin Channel Interior

  • David Busath
  • Greg Hemsley
  • Terry Bridal
  • Michael Pear
  • Kevin Gaffney
  • Martin Karplus
Part of the The Jerusalem Symposia on Quantum Chemistry and Biochemistry book series (JSQC, volume 21)

Abstract

Guanidinium is a planar trigonal cation which is similar in size to the gramicidin channel pore. We measured the effect of guanidinium on the conductance properties of the gramicidin channel and theoretically evaluated its interactions with the β-6.3 channel interior using an energy minimization and conformational search approach. Guanidinium current (measured in the absence of other permeable ions) could not be detected directly (g(Guan)/g(K) < 0.004). However, guanidinium induces blocks in gramicidin channel potassium currents. The average block duration gets shorter with increased membrane potential suggesting that guanidinium can penetrate the ion channel. Energy minimization calculations indicate that, by reorienting along the pathway, the guanidinium should be able to penetrate the gramicidin channel. This finding is illustrated by a computer graphics animation of the series of minimum-energy orientations. The low permeability of the channel to guanidinium is tentatively ascribed to an entropic barrier resulting from the restrictions on the ion motion in the channel.

Keywords

Outward Current Selectivity Filter Guanidine Hydrochloride Free Energy Barrier Transmembrane Channel 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Begenisich, T. B. and M. D. Cahalan. 1980a. ‘Sodium channel permeation in squid axons. I: Reversal potential experiments’. J. Physiol. 307: 217–242.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Begenisich, T. B. and M. D. Cahalan. 1980b. ‘Sodium channel permeation in squid axons. II: Non-independence and current-voltage relations’. J. Physiol. 307: 243–257.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Brooks, B.R., Bruccoleri, R.E., Olafson, B.D., States, D.J., Swaminathan, S., and M. Karplus. 1983. ‘CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations’. Journal of Comp. Chem. 4: 187- 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Busath, D. and G. Szabo. 1988. ‘Low conductance gramicidin A channels are head-to-head dimers of β-6-helices’. Biophys. J. 53: 689–695.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Colquhoun, D. and F. J. Sigworth. 1983. ‘Fitting and statistical analysis of single-channel records’. In Single-Channel Recording. B Sakmann and E. Neher, eds. Plenum Press, New York, pp 191–263.Google Scholar
  6. Eisenman, G. 1962. ‘Cation selective glass electrodes and their mode of operation’. Biophys. J. 2: 259–323.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eisenman, G., Krasne, S., and S. Ciani. 1976. ‘Further studies on ion selectivity’. In Ion and Enzyme Electrodes in Medicine and in Biology. M. Kessler, L. Clark, D. Lubbers, J. Silver, and W. Simon, eds. Urban and Schwarzenberg, Munich-Berlin-Vienna, pp 3–22.Google Scholar
  8. Herzig, L., Massa, L.J., Santoro, A., and A.M. Sapse. 1981. ‘Guanidinium Ion Self-Consistent Field Calculations: Fluoro, Amino, and Methyl Single Substituents’. J. Org. Chem. 46: 2330–2333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hille, B. 1971. ‘The Permeability of the Sodium Channel to Organic Cations in Myelinated Nerve’. J. Gen. Physiol 58: 599–619.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hille, B. 1975. ‘Ionic Selectivity of Na and K channels of nerve membranes’. In Membranes - A Series of Advances. Vol 3, Dynamic Properties of Lipid Bilayers and Biological Membranes. G. Eisenman, ed. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York. 255–323.Google Scholar
  11. Hille, B. 1984. Ionic Channels of Excitable Membranes. Sinauer Associates Inc. Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
  12. Hladky, S.B. and D.A. Haydon. 1972. ‘Ion transfer across lipid membranes in the presence of gramicidin A. I. Studies of the unit conductance channel’. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 274: 294–312.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Koeppe, R.E. II and L.B. Weiss. 1981. ‘Resolution of linear gramicidins by preparative reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography’. J.Chromatog. 208: 414–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. McCammon, J. A., Gelin, B. R., and M. Karplus. 1977. ‘Dynamics of folded proteins’. Nature 267: 585–590.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Myers, V. B. and D. A. Haydon. 1972. ‘Ion transfer across lipid membranes in the presence of gramicidin A. II. The ion selectivity’. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 274: 313–322.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Parsegian, A. 1969. ‘Energy of an ion crossing a low dielectric membrane: solutions to four relevant electrostatic problems’. Nature 221: 844–846.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Roux, B. and M. Karplus. 1988. ‘The normal modes of the gramicidin-A dimer channel’. Biophys. J. 53: 297–310.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Urry, D. W., Goodall, M. C, Glickson, J. D., and D. F. Mayers. 1971. ‘The gramicidin A transmembrane channel: Characteristics of head-to-head dimerized pi(L,D) helices’. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 68: 1907–1911.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ussing, H. H. 1949. ‘The distinction by means of tracers between active transport and diffusion’. Acta Physiol. Scand. 19: 43–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Venkatachalam, C. M. and D. W. Urry. 1983. ‘Theoretical conformational analysis of the gramicidin A transmembrane channel. I. Helix sense and energetics of head-to-head dimerization’. J. Comput. Chem. 4: 461–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Venkatachalam, C. M. and D. W. Urry. 1984. ‘Theoretical analysis of gramicidin A transmembrane channel. II. Energetics of helical librational states of the channel’. J. Comput. Chem. 5: 64–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Busath
    • 1
  • Greg Hemsley
    • 1
  • Terry Bridal
    • 1
  • Michael Pear
    • 1
  • Kevin Gaffney
    • 2
  • Martin Karplus
    • 2
  1. 1.Section of Physiology and BiophysicsBrown UniversityProvidenceUSA
  2. 2.Department of ChemistryHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations