Guanidinium as a Probe of the Gramicidin Channel Interior
Abstract
Guanidinium is a planar trigonal cation which is similar in size to the gramicidin channel pore. We measured the effect of guanidinium on the conductance properties of the gramicidin channel and theoretically evaluated its interactions with the β-6.3 channel interior using an energy minimization and conformational search approach. Guanidinium current (measured in the absence of other permeable ions) could not be detected directly (g(Guan)/g(K) < 0.004). However, guanidinium induces blocks in gramicidin channel potassium currents. The average block duration gets shorter with increased membrane potential suggesting that guanidinium can penetrate the ion channel. Energy minimization calculations indicate that, by reorienting along the pathway, the guanidinium should be able to penetrate the gramicidin channel. This finding is illustrated by a computer graphics animation of the series of minimum-energy orientations. The low permeability of the channel to guanidinium is tentatively ascribed to an entropic barrier resulting from the restrictions on the ion motion in the channel.
Keywords
Outward Current Selectivity Filter Guanidine Hydrochloride Free Energy Barrier Transmembrane ChannelPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Begenisich, T. B. and M. D. Cahalan. 1980a. ‘Sodium channel permeation in squid axons. I: Reversal potential experiments’. J. Physiol. 307: 217–242.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Begenisich, T. B. and M. D. Cahalan. 1980b. ‘Sodium channel permeation in squid axons. II: Non-independence and current-voltage relations’. J. Physiol. 307: 243–257.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brooks, B.R., Bruccoleri, R.E., Olafson, B.D., States, D.J., Swaminathan, S., and M. Karplus. 1983. ‘CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations’. Journal of Comp. Chem. 4: 187- 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Busath, D. and G. Szabo. 1988. ‘Low conductance gramicidin A channels are head-to-head dimers of β-6-helices’. Biophys. J. 53: 689–695.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Colquhoun, D. and F. J. Sigworth. 1983. ‘Fitting and statistical analysis of single-channel records’. In Single-Channel Recording. B Sakmann and E. Neher, eds. Plenum Press, New York, pp 191–263.Google Scholar
- Eisenman, G. 1962. ‘Cation selective glass electrodes and their mode of operation’. Biophys. J. 2: 259–323.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Eisenman, G., Krasne, S., and S. Ciani. 1976. ‘Further studies on ion selectivity’. In Ion and Enzyme Electrodes in Medicine and in Biology. M. Kessler, L. Clark, D. Lubbers, J. Silver, and W. Simon, eds. Urban and Schwarzenberg, Munich-Berlin-Vienna, pp 3–22.Google Scholar
- Herzig, L., Massa, L.J., Santoro, A., and A.M. Sapse. 1981. ‘Guanidinium Ion Self-Consistent Field Calculations: Fluoro, Amino, and Methyl Single Substituents’. J. Org. Chem. 46: 2330–2333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hille, B. 1971. ‘The Permeability of the Sodium Channel to Organic Cations in Myelinated Nerve’. J. Gen. Physiol 58: 599–619.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hille, B. 1975. ‘Ionic Selectivity of Na and K channels of nerve membranes’. In Membranes - A Series of Advances. Vol 3, Dynamic Properties of Lipid Bilayers and Biological Membranes. G. Eisenman, ed. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York. 255–323.Google Scholar
- Hille, B. 1984. Ionic Channels of Excitable Membranes. Sinauer Associates Inc. Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
- Hladky, S.B. and D.A. Haydon. 1972. ‘Ion transfer across lipid membranes in the presence of gramicidin A. I. Studies of the unit conductance channel’. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 274: 294–312.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Koeppe, R.E. II and L.B. Weiss. 1981. ‘Resolution of linear gramicidins by preparative reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography’. J.Chromatog. 208: 414–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McCammon, J. A., Gelin, B. R., and M. Karplus. 1977. ‘Dynamics of folded proteins’. Nature 267: 585–590.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Myers, V. B. and D. A. Haydon. 1972. ‘Ion transfer across lipid membranes in the presence of gramicidin A. II. The ion selectivity’. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 274: 313–322.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Parsegian, A. 1969. ‘Energy of an ion crossing a low dielectric membrane: solutions to four relevant electrostatic problems’. Nature 221: 844–846.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Roux, B. and M. Karplus. 1988. ‘The normal modes of the gramicidin-A dimer channel’. Biophys. J. 53: 297–310.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Urry, D. W., Goodall, M. C, Glickson, J. D., and D. F. Mayers. 1971. ‘The gramicidin A transmembrane channel: Characteristics of head-to-head dimerized pi(L,D) helices’. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 68: 1907–1911.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ussing, H. H. 1949. ‘The distinction by means of tracers between active transport and diffusion’. Acta Physiol. Scand. 19: 43–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Venkatachalam, C. M. and D. W. Urry. 1983. ‘Theoretical conformational analysis of the gramicidin A transmembrane channel. I. Helix sense and energetics of head-to-head dimerization’. J. Comput. Chem. 4: 461–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Venkatachalam, C. M. and D. W. Urry. 1984. ‘Theoretical analysis of gramicidin A transmembrane channel. II. Energetics of helical librational states of the channel’. J. Comput. Chem. 5: 64–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar