Advertisement

Changes in Chlorophyll Fluorescence Related to Photoinhibition of Photosynthesis and Cold Acclimation of Green Plants

  • Susanne Somersalo
  • G. Heinrich Krause

Abstract

Fluorescence induction at 20ºC and 77K was applied in this study to characterize the photoinhibition of spinach leaves (Spinacia oleracea L.) induced in moderate light at chilling temperature. When plants acclimated to +18ºC and 260–300 μmol photons m-2 s-1 were exposed to 550 μmol m-2 s-1 at +4ºC, they developed a strong photoinhibition within a few hours. This was manifested by a decline in variable fluorescence (FV) of both photosystems (PS) and in quantum yield of O2 evolution. The changes in fluorescence characteristics were more pronounced in the signal recorded at 20°C that at 77K. Moreover, the ratio of variable to maximum fluorescence (FV/FM) measured at 20°C was more closely related to quantum yield than FV/FM at 77K. The FV/FM ratio recorded at 20°C is thus regarded as the more sensitive indicator of photoinhibition. The effects related to photoinhibition of unhardened spinach leaves, including a pronounced increase of initial fluorescence (Fo), were fully reversible at +18°C in dim light. The reversible photoinhibition is viewed as a protective mechanism serving for thermal dissipation of excess light energy. Cold acclimation of the plants increased their resistance to photoinhibition. The mechanism of photoinhibition seemed to be altered in cold acclimated leaves, as indicated by constant Fo. Cold acclimation apparently enforces other protective mechanisms, and photoinhibition then occurs only in higher light.

Key words

cold acclimation fluorescence of chlorophyll photoinhibition photosynthesis quantum yield Spinacia oleracea L. 

Abbreviations

FO

initial fluorescence

FM

maximum fluorescence

FV

variable fluorescence (FM–FO)

PFD

photon flux density

PS

photosystem

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barényi B and Krause GH 1985. Inhibition of photosynthetic reactions by light. A study with isolated spinach chloroplasts. Planta 163: 218–226.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Björkman O and Demmig B 1987. Photon yield of O2 evolution and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics at 77K among vascular plants of diverse origins. Planta 170: 489–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Butler WL 1977. Chlorophyll fluorescence: a probe for electron transport and energy transfer. In: Trebst A and Avron M. Encyclopedia of plant physiology, new series. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
  4. Cleland RE, Melis A and Neale PJ 1986. Mechanism of photoinhibition: Photochemical reaction center inactivation in system II of chloroplasts. Photosynth. Res. 9: 79–88.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Demmig B and Björkman O 1986. Comparison of the effect of excessive light on chlorophyll fluorescence (77K) and photon yield of O2 evolution of leaves of higher plants. Planta 171: 171–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Greer DH, Berry JA and Björkman O 1986. Photoinhibition of photosynthesis in intact bean leaves: a role of light and temperature, and requirement for chloroplast-protein synthesis during recovery. Planta 168: 253–260.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Klosson RJ and Krause GH 1981. Freezing injury in cold acclimated and unhardened spinach leaves. I. Photosynthetic reactions of thylakoids isolated from frost-damaged leaves. Planta: 339–346.Google Scholar
  8. Krause GH and Behrend U 1986. ApH-dependent chlorophyll fluorescence quenching indicating a mechanism of protection against photoinhibition of chloroplasts. FEBS Lett. 200: 298–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Krause GH and Comic C 1987. CO2 and O2 interactions in photoinhibition. In: Kyle DJ, Osmond CB and Arntzen CJ. Photoinhibition. Topics in photosynthesis, vol. 9, Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  10. Krause GH and Laasch H 1987. Energy-dependent chlorophyll fluorescence quenching in chloroplasts correlated with quantum yield of photosynthesis. Z. Naturforsch. 42c: 581–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kyle DJ, Osmond CB and Arntzen CJ (eds.) 1987. Photoinhibition. Topics in photosynthesis, vol. 9. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  12. Leverenz JW and Öquist G 1987. Quantum yields of photosynthesis at temperatures between -2°C and 35°C in a cold-tolerant C3 plant (Pinus sylvestris) during the course of one year. Plant Cell Environ. 10: 287–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ogren E and Öquist G 1984. Photoinhibition of photosynthesis in Lemna gibba as induced by the interaction between light and temperature. III. Chlorophyll fluorescence at 77K. Physiol. Plant. 62: 193–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Powles SB and Björkman 1982. Photoinhibition of photosynthesis: effect on chlorophyll fluorescence at 77K in intact leaves and in chloroplast membranes of Nerium oleander. Planta 165: 97–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Weis E and Berry JA 1987. Quantum efficiency of photosystem II in relation to ‘energy’-dependent quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 894: 198–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susanne Somersalo
    • 1
  • G. Heinrich Krause
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Biochemistry of PlantsUniversity of DüsseldorfDüsseldorf 1Germany

Personalised recommendations