Phaseolus Germplasm Exploration

  • D. G. Debouck
Chapter
Part of the Current Plant Science and Biotechnology in Agriculture book series (PSBA, volume 6)

Abstract

Much has been written on the subject of germplasm collection (see HAWKES et al., 1983, for a revised bibliography on the subject). However, less literature deals directly with the germplasm of Phaseolus beans. Aspects of Phaseolus germplasm exploration and their consequences for subsequent germplasm use and management will be discussed here.

Keywords

Genetic Resource Common Bean Plant Genetic Resource Genic Combination Seed Type 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    Adams, M.W. 1977. An estimation of homogeneity in crop plants, with special reference to genetic vulnerability in the dry bean, Phaseolus vulgaris L. Euphytica 26:665–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Allard, R.W. 1970. Population structure and sampling methods, p. 97–107. In Frankel, O.H. and E. Bennett (eds.), Genetic Resources in Plants — their exploration and conservation. International Biological Programme Handbook No. 11, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baudet, J.C. 1977. Origine et classification des espèces cultivées du genre Phaseolus. Bull. Soc. Roy. Bot. Belg. 110:65–76.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bennett, E. 1970. Tactics of plant exploration, p. 157–179. In Frankel, O.H. and E. Bennet (eds.), Genetic Resources in Plants — their exploration and conservation. International Biological Programme Handbook No. 11, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berglund-Brucher, O. and H. Brucher. 1976. The South American wild bean (Phaseolus aborigineus Burk.) as ancestor of the common bean. Econ. Bot. 30:257–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bogyo, T.P., E. Porceddu, and P. Perrino. 1980. Analysis of sampling strategies for collecting genetic material. Econ. Bot. 34:160–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brown, A.H.D. and J. Munday. 1982. Population-genetic structure and optimal sampling of land races of barley from Iran. Genetica 58:85–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brown, W.L. 1983. Genetic diversity and genetic vulnerability — an appraisal. Econ. Bot. 37:4–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brucher, H. 1954. Argentinian, Urheimat unserer Bohnen. Umschau. Wiss. Techn. 54:14–15.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Buhrow, R. 1983. The wild beans of southwestern North America. Desert Plants 5:67–88.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Burkart, A. 1941. Sobre la existencia de razas silvestres de Phaseolus vulgaris y Phaseolus lunatus en el norte argentino. Resoluc, y Resúmenes, Botánica, Primera Reunión Argentina de Agronomia, Buenos Aires:52.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Burkart, A. 1952. Las leguminosas argentinas silvestres y cultivadas. Acme, 2nd ed., Buenos Aires, 569 p.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Carter, G. F. 1945. Plant geography and culture history in the American Southwest. Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology 5:1–140.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    De Candolle, A. 1883. Origine des plantes cultivées. Librairie Gemmer Baillière & Cie., Paris, 378 p.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Delgado Salinas, A., E. Martinez Hernández, and P. Fernández Ortuño. 1982. Estudio del polen de Phaseolus chiapasanus Piper (Leguminosae — Phaseolinae). Bol. Soc. Bot. México 43:25–34.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gentry, H. S. 1969. Origin of the common bean, Phaseolus vulgaris Econ. Bot. 23:55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gepts, P.L. 1984. Nutritional and evolutionary implications of phaseolin seed protein variability in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). PhD Thesis, Univ. Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, 209 p.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gepts, P.L. and F.A. Bliss. 1985. Usefulness of phaseolin as an evolutionary marker. Ann. Rpt. Bean Improv. Coop. 28:60–61.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Harlan, J.R. 1975. Crops and man. American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Madison, Wisonsin, USA, 295 p.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Harlan, J.R. 1976. Genetic resources in wild relatives of crops. Crop Sci. 16:329–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Harlan, J.R. and J.M.J. De Wet. 1971. Towards a rational classification of cultivated plants. Taxon 20:509–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hawkes, J.G. 1976. Sampling gene pools, p. 145–154. In Simmons J.B., R.I. Beyer, P.E. Brandham, G.L. Lucas and V.T.J.H. Parry (eds.), Conservation of threatened plants. NATO Conference series 1 Ecology, Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hawkes, J.G. 1980. Crop genetic resources field collection manual. International Board for Plant Genetic Resources and European Association for Research on Plant Breeding (Eucarpia), IBPGR Secretariat, Rome, 37 p.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hawkes, J.G., J.T. Williams, and R.P. Croston. 1983. A bibliography of crop genetic resources. International Board for Plant Genetic Resources, IBPGR Secretariat, Rome, 442p.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hernández Xolocotzi, E. 1970. Apuntes sobre la exploración etnobotánica y su metodologia. Colegio de Postgraduados, Escuela Nacional de Agricultura, SAG, Chapingo, México, 69 p.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hernández Xolocotzi, E. 1973. Genetic Resources of primitive varieties of Mesoamerican Zea spp., Phaseolus spp., Capsicum spp, and Cucurbita spp., p. 76–115. In Frankel, O.H., Survey of crop genetic resources in their centres of diversity. First Report. FAO/IBP, Rome.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hucl, P. and G.J. Scoles. 1985. Interspecific hybridization in the common bean: a review. HortSci. 20:352–357.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jain, S.K. 1975. Population structure and the effect of breeding system, p. 15–36. In Frankel, O.H. and J.G. Hawkes (eds.), Crop genetic resources for today and tomorrow. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jain, S.K. 1979. Biosystematic studies of populations in germplasm collections, p. 103–110. In Proc. Conf. Broadening Genet. Base Crops, Wageningen, 1978. Pudoc, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Knapp, R. 1984. Sample (relevé) areas (distribution, homogeneity, size shape) and plot-less sampling, p. 101–119. In Knapp, R. (ed.), Sampling methods and taxon analysis in vegetation science. Dr. W. Junk Publishers, The Hague.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lackey, J.A. 1983. A review of generic concepts in American Phaseolinae (Fabaceae, Faboideae). Iselya 2:21–64.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lyman, J.M. 1984. Progress and planning for germplasm conservation of major food crops. Plant Genet. Resources Newsl. 60:3–21.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Maréchal, R., J.M. Mascherpa, and F. Stainier. 1978. Etude taxonomique d’un groupe d’espèces des genres Phaseolus et Vigna (Papilionaceae) sur la base de données morphologiques et polliniques, traitées par l’analyse informatique. Boissiera 28:1–273.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Marshall, D.R. and A.H.D. Brown. 1975. Optimum sampling strategies in genetic conservation, p. 53–80. In Frankel, O.H. and J.G. Hawkes (eds.), Crop genetic resources for today and tomorrow. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Marshall, D.R. and A.H.D. Brown. 1983. Theory of forage plant collection, p. 135–148. In Mc Ivor, J.G. and R.A. Bray (eds.), Genetic resources of forage plants. CSIRO, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Marshall, D.R., A.H.D. Brown, and O.H. Frankel. 1973. Exploration and conservation of plant genetic resources. Ann. Rpt. Div. Plant Ind., CSIRO, Canberra, Australia, p.19–22.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Miranda Colin, S. 1967. Origen de Phaseolus vulgaris L. (frijol común). Agrociencia 1:99–109.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Nabhan, G.P. 1979. Cultivation and culture. Ecologist 9:259–263.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Nabhan, G.P. 1985. Native crop diversity in Aridoamerica: conservation of regional gene pools. Econ. Bot. 39:387–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Nabhan, G.P., J.W. Berry, and C.W. Weber. 1980. Wild beans of the greater Southwest — Phaseolus metcalfei and P. ritensis. Econ. Bot. 34:68–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Nabhan, G.P. and R.S. Feiger. 1978. Teparies in southwestern North America — a biogeographical and ethnohistorical study of Phaseolus acutifolius. Econ. Bot. 32:2–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Oka, H.I. 1975. Consideration on the population size necessary for conservation of crop germplasms, p. 57–63. In Matsuo, T. (ed.), Gene conservation — exploration, collection, preservation and utilization of genetic resources. JIBP Synthesis, Univ. of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, vol. 5.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Okonkwo, C.A. and C.D. Clayberg. 1984. The incidence of outcrossing as related to distance in Phaseolus coccineus L. Ann. Rpt. Bean Improv. Coop. 27:157–158.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Piper, C.V. 1926. Studies in American Phaseolinae. Contr. US Nat. Herb. 22:663–701.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Qualset, C.O. 1975. Sampling germplasm in a center of diversity: an example of disease resistance in Ethiopian barley, p. 81–96. In Frankel, O.H. and J.G. Hawkes (eds.), Crop genetic resources for today and tomorrow. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Rivera Irene, M. 1941. Ensayo de interpretación botánica dellibro X de la Historia de Sahagún. An. Inst. Biol. Mex. 12:439–488.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Schoonhoven, A. van, C. Cardona, and J. Flower Valor. 1981. Niveles de resistencia al gorgojo pintado, Zabrotes subfasciatus Boheman en frijoies cultivados y silvestres. Rev. Col. Entom. 7:41–45.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Small, J.K. 1903. Flora of the Southeastern United States. Publish. Author. New York. 1903.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Smartt, J. 1979. Interspecific hybridization in the grain legumes — a review. Econ. Bot. 33:329–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Webster, B.D., R. M. Ross, and M.C. Sigourney. 1980. A morphological study of the development of reproductive structures of Phaseolus coccineus. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 105:828–833.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Weiseth, G. 1954. Una variedad silvestre del poroto común (Phaseolus vulgaris), autóctona del Noroeste Argentino y su relación genética con variedades cultivadas. Rev. Agron. Noroeste Argentino 1:71–81.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Westphal, E. 1974. Pulses in Ethiopia, their taxonomy and agricultural significance. Agric. Res. Rep. 815, Wageningen, The Netherlands. 276 p.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Yates, F. 1971. Sampling methods for censuses and surveys, 3rd ed., Charles Griffin, London. 440 p.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. G. Debouck

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations