The Relationship Between Consciousness and Language

  • Hubert Schleichert
Chapter
Part of the Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science book series (BSPS, volume 116)

Abstract

What is the meaning of the terms “consciousness” and “to be conscious of something”? What does it mean, when we say that humans are conscious, but animals perhaps are not? The answer suggested in this paper is simple, but in order to substantiate it, some preliminary deliberations cannot be avoided. There is, of course, some vagueness in the current use of the term “consciousness” and there are practically no definitions or explanations of that term to be found in the present “philosophy of mind”, yet the case is not a hopeless one. In order to analyze what is or could be meant by “consciousness” one first has to find a set of statements concerning or containing this term, which are commonly accepted. (Should this set be empty, any discussion on consciousness would be unintelligible). I call this set the “canonic phraseology” of the terms “consciousness” and “to be conscious of”. This phraseology can be derived especially from philosophical texts of the 17th and 18th centuries, which may seem antiquated in the age of mass produced papers on “the phenomenon of the mind in the computer age”, but there is a good reason for looking back.

Keywords

Conscious Thinking German Edition Philosophical Text Cartesian Position Metaphysical Position 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Brentano, F. (1874). Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt, Leipzig.Google Scholar
  2. Delbruck, M. (1986). Mind from Matter, Palo Alto: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  3. Descartes, R. (1637). Discours de la Méthode.Google Scholar
  4. Descartes, R. (1646). Letter to the Marquis of Newcastle, Nov. 23rd, 1649 (Adam-Tannery 4, p. 575).Google Scholar
  5. Descartes, R. (1649). Letter to H. Morus, Febr. 5th, 1649 (Adam-Tannery 5, p. 278).Google Scholar
  6. Fodor, I. (1975). The Language of Thought, New York: Crowell.Google Scholar
  7. Hassler, G. (1986). Die These von der Sprachrelativität des Denkens in der Aufklärung und bei W. v. Humboldt; in Welke (1986a), pp. 154–177.Google Scholar
  8. Herder, J. A. (1772). “Abhandlung über den Ursprung der Sprache”, in J. G. Herder, Werke in 10 Bänden, Deutscher Klassiker Verl., Frankf./M. 1985, vol 1.Google Scholar
  9. Kirchmann, J. H. v. (1872). J. Locke, Versuch über den menschlichen Verstand (Translation of Locke’s Essay), Berlin: Heimann.Google Scholar
  10. Kleist, H. (1878). “Über die allmähliche Verfertigung der Gedanken beim Reden”, in H. v. Kleist, Werke und Briefe in 4 Bänden, Aufbau-Verl. Berlin 1978.Google Scholar
  11. Leibniz, G. W. (1). unpublished manuscript, quoted from Schneider (1985).Google Scholar
  12. Leibniz, G. W. (1665). Nouveaux essais sur l’entendement par l’auteur du systeme de l’harmonie preestablie.Google Scholar
  13. Leibniz, G. W. (1923). Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe, hg. v. d. Preussischen Akad. Wiss., Darmstadt 1923ff.Google Scholar
  14. Locke, J. (1689). Essay Concerning Human Understanding.Google Scholar
  15. Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1845). “Die deutsche Ideologie”, in MEGA, vol. I 5 (written 1845, published 1932).Google Scholar
  16. Mauthner, F. (1923). Beiträge zu einer Kritik der Sprache, 3rd edit. Leipzig 1923.Google Scholar
  17. La Mettrie (1748). L’homme machine.Google Scholar
  18. Nietzsche (1882). Die fröhliche Wissenschaft.Google Scholar
  19. Popper, K. and Eccles, J. (1977). The Seif and Its Brain, Springer Internat.Google Scholar
  20. Reimarus, H. S. (1756). Die Vernunftlehre, als eine Anweisung zum richtigen Gebrauche der Vernunft.Google Scholar
  21. Schneider, M. (1985). “Leibniz über Geist und Maschine”, Philos. Jahrb. der Görres-Gesellschaft 92, 335–352.Google Scholar
  22. Spinoza, B. (1677). Ethica ordine geometrico demonstrata.Google Scholar
  23. Stöhr, A. (1910). Lehrbuch der Logik in psychologisierender Darstellung, Leipzig/Wien: Deuticke.Google Scholar
  24. Welke, K. (1986). “Zur philosophischen und sprachtheoretischen Begründung der Einheit von Sprache und Denken bei W. v. Humboldt”, in Welke (1986a), pp. 9–67.Google Scholar
  25. Welke, K. (1986a) (Edit.): Sprache — Bewußtsein — Tätigkeit, Berlin (DDR).Google Scholar
  26. Wolff, Chr. (1751). Vernünftige Gedanken von Gott, der Welt und der Seele des Menschen, Frankf./M.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hubert Schleichert

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations