Tectonic Evolution of the Tethyan Region pp 387-413

Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (ASIC, volume 259) | Cite as

Crustal Scale Thrusting and Continental Subduction During Himalayan Collision Tectonics on the NW Indian Plate

  • Robert W. H. Butler
  • M. P. Coward


Following the subduction of Tethyan oceanic lithosphere beneath Asia and Kohistan the continued convergence between the upper plate and the Indian continent led to thrust stacking of Indian crust to form the Himalayas. This lasted from Oligocene to Recent times and in an attempt to evaluate displacements, a series of balanced cross-sections have been constructed across the belt. In Pakistan these illustrate that over 600km of relative convergence between India and the Kohistan complex north of the Eocene suture zone has occurred by SSE-directed thrusting. This deformation only involves Indian upper crust at present outcrop levels so that the lower crust and remaining lithosphere must have been subducted beneath Kohistan and Tibet. The northern edge of the Indian lower crust may lie beneath the Pamirs. Similarly large amounts of shortening (several hundred kilometres) are implied by other balanced crustal sections through the central Himalayas and western Pakistan. The continuity of thrust systems around the NW margin of the Indian continent is proposed so that thrusts which stack continental crust step off into oceanic lithosphere in the west. This thrusting mechanism accounts for a substantial fraction of the total, 1200–2000km relative convergence between stable India and Asia. Further shortening in the Tibetan region which developed after the Eocene continent-continent collision must be added to the displacements on thrusts which stack Indian lithosphere. Deformation within the entire collision zone approximates more closely to an essentially vertical plane strain model rather than to a process of lateral expulsion of Tibet towards the east.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Chang, C. & Cheng H.: 1973. ‘Some tectonic features of the Mt. Polmo Lungma area, southern Tibet, China’. Sci. Sinica 16, pp. 257–265.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Argand, E.: 1924. ‘La tectonique de l’asie’. 13th International Geological Congress, Brussels, v. 1, pp. 170–372.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Powell, C.M.: 1979. ‘A speculative tectonic history of Pakistan and surroundings: some constraints from the Indian Ocean’. In: A. Farah & K.A. DeJong (eds.) Geodynamics of Pakistan. Geol. Surv. Pakistan, Quetta, pp. 5–24.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Powell, C.M. & Conaghan, P.J.: 1973. ‘Plate tectonics and the Himalayas’. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 20, pp. 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mattauer, M.: 1983. ‘Subduction de lithosphere continentale, decollement croute-manteau et chevanchements d’echelle crustale dans la chaine de collision himalayenne’. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris 296, pp. 481–86.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mattauer, M.: 1986. ‘Intracontinental subduction, crustmantle decollement and crustal stacking wedge in the Himalaya and other collision belts’. In: M.P. Coward & A.C. Ries (eds.) Collision Tectonics. Spec. Publs. Geol. Soc. London, 19 pp. 7–50.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Soper, N.J. & Barber, A.J. 1982. ‘A model for the deep structure of the Moine thrust zone’. J. Geol. Soc. London, 139, pp. 127–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brun, J.P., Burg, J.P. & Ming, C.G.: 1985. ‘Strain trajectories above the Main Central thrust (Himalaya) in southern Tibet’. Nature, 313, pp. 388–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hirn, A. et al.: 1984. ‘Crustal structure and variability of the Himalayan border of Tibet’. Nature, 307, pp. 25–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dewey, J.F. & Burke, K.C.A.: 1973. ‘Tibetan, Variscan and Precambrian basement reactivation: products of continental collision’. J. Geol., 81, pp. 683–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tapponnier, P., Peltzer, G., Ledain, Y., Armijo, R. & Cobbold, P.: 1982. ‘Propagating extrusion tectonics in Asia: new insights from simple experiments with plasticine’. Geology, 10, pp. 611–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Seeber, L., & Armbruster, J.: 1979. ‘Seismicity of the Hazara arc in northern Pakistan: decollement vs. basement faulting’. In: A. Farah & K.A. DeJong (eds.). Geodynamics of Pakistan, Geol. Surv. Pakistan, Quetta, pp. 131–42.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Seeber, L., Armbruster, J. & Quittmeyer, R.C.: 1981. ‘Seismicity and continental subduction in the Himalayan arc’. In: H.K. Gupta & F.M. Delany (eds.) Zagros, Hindu Kish, Himalaya, geodynamic evolution. Geodynamic series 3, Am. Geophys. Un., pp. 215–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ni, J. & Barazangi, M.: 1984. ‘Seismotectonics of the Himalayan collison zone: geometry of the underthrusting Indian plate beneath the Himalaya’. J. Geophys. Res., 89, pp. 1147–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Coward, M.P.: 1983. ‘Thrust tectonics, thin skinned or thick skinned, and the continuation of thrusts to deep in the crust’. J. Struct. Geol., 5, pp. 113–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Coward, M.P. & Butler, R.W.H.: 1985. ‘Thrust tectonics and the deep structure of Pakistan Himalyas’. Geology, 13, pp. 417–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lyon-Caen, H. & Molnar, P.: 1983. ‘Constraints on the structure of the Himalaya from an analysis of gravity anomalies and a flexural model of the lithosphere’. J. Geophys. Res., 88, pp. 8171–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yeats, R.S., Khan, S.H. & Akhtar, M.: 1984. ‘Late Quaternary deformation of the Salt Range of Pakistan’. Bull. Geol. Soc. Am., 95, pp. 958–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Farah, A., Mirza, M.A., Ahmad, M.A. & Butt, M.H.: 1977. ‘Gravity field of the buried shield in the Punjab Plain, Pakistan’. Bull. Geol. Soc. Am., 88, pp. 1147–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gee, E.R.: 1980. ‘Pakistan geological Salt Range series, 1∶50 000 (6 sheets)’. Directorate of Overseas Surveys, U.K., Geol. Surv. Pakistan.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hossack, J.R.: 1979. ‘The use of balanced cross-sections in the calculation of orogenic contraction: a review’. J. geol. Soc. London, 136, pp. 705–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Elliott, D. & Johnson, M.R.W.: 1980. ‘Structural evolution in the northern part of the Moine thrust belt of NW Scotland’. Trans. R. Soc. Edinburgh, Earth Sci., 71, pp. 69–96.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Burbank, D.W.: 1983. ‘The chronology of intermontaine basin development in the NW Himalaya’. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 64, pp. 77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Elliott, D.: 1983. ‘The construction of balanced cross-sections’. J. Struct. Geol., 5, pp. 101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tahirkheli, R.A.K. & Jan, M.Q.: 1979. ‘Geology of Kohistan, Karakorum and Himalaya, North Pakistan’. Geol. Bull. Univ. Peshawar, 11, pp. 189.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Coward, M.P. & Potts, G.J.: 1983. ‘Complex strain patterns developed at the frontal and lateral tips to shear zones and thrust zones’. J. Struct. Geol., 5, pp. 383–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Le Fort, P., Debou, F. & Sonet, J.: 1980. ‘The lesser Himalaya cordierite granite belt: typology and the age of the pluton of Mansehra, Pakistan’. Geol. Bull. Univ. Peshawar, 13, pp. 51–61.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gansser, A.: 1964. ‘Geology of the Himalayas’. John Wiley, London, 289 pp.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Trommsdorff, V., Dietrich, V. & Honegger, K.: 1983. ‘The Indus suture zone: paleotectonic and igneous evolution in the Ladakh-Himalayas’. In: K.J. Hsu (ed.) Mountain Building Processes, Academic Press, London, pp. 213–19.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Calkins, J.A., Oldfield, T.Q., Abdullah, S.K.M. & Tayyab Ali, S.: 1975. ‘Geology of the southern Himalaya in Hazara, Pakistan and adjacent areas’. U.S. Geol. Surv. prof. pap., 716C, 20pp.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Coward, M.P., Jan, M.Q., Rex, D., Tarney, J., Thirlwall, M. & Windley, B.F.: 1982. ‘Geotectonic framework of the Himalaya of North Pakistan’. J. Geol. Soc. London, 139. pp. 299–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Windley, B.F.: 1983. ‘Metamorphism and tectonics of the Himalaya’. J. Geol. Soc. London, 140, pp. 849–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bard, J.P.: 1983. ‘Metamorphism of an obducted island arc: example of the Kohistan sequence (Pakistan) in the Himalayan collided range’. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 65, pp. 133–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Boyer, S.E. & Elliott, D.: 1982. ‘Thrust systems’. Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol., 66, pp. 1196–230.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Price, R.A.: 1981. ‘The Cordilleran foreland thrust and fold belt in the southern Canadian Rocky Mountains’. In: K.R. McClay & N.J. Price (eds.) Thrust and Nappe Tectonics. Spec. publs. Geol. Soc. London, 9, pp. 427–48.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Blundell, D.J.: 1984. ‘Deformation of the Caledonide lithosphere of northwest Scotland’. Tectonophysics, 109, pp. 137–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Butler, R.W.H.: 1984. ‘Balanced cross-sections and their implications for the deep structure of the northwest Alps: reply. J. Struct. Geol., 6, pp. 607–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Burg, J.P. & Chen, G.M.: 1984. ‘Tectonics and structural zonation of southern Tibet, China’. Nature, 311, pp. 219–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Elliott, D.: 1976a. ‘The motion of thrust sheets’. J. geophys. Res., 81, pp. 949–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Zeitler, P.K.: 1985. ‘Cooling history of the NW Himalaya, Pakistan’. Tectonics, 4, pp. 127–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Armbruster, J., Seeber, L. & Jacob, H.: 1978. ‘The Northwestern termination of the Himalayan mountain front: active tectonics from microearthquakes’. J. Geophys. Res., 83, pp. 269–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Elliott, D.: 1981. ‘The strength of rocks in thrust sheets’. EOS, 62, pp. 397.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Butler, R.W.H.: 1982. ‘The terminology of structures in thrust belts’. J. Struct. Geol., 4, pp. 239–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Banks, C.J. & Warburton, J.: 1986. ‘Passive roof duplex geometry in the frontal structures of the Kirthar and Sulaiman mountain belts, Pakistan’. J. Struct. Geol., 8, 229–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Lawrence, R.D., Khan, S.H., DeJong, K.A., Farah, A. & Yeats, R.S.: 1981. ‘Thrust and strike slip fault interaction along the Chaman transform zone, Pakistan’. In: K.R. McClay & N.J. Price (eds.), Thrust and nappe tectonics. Spec. publ. Geol. Soc. London, 9, pp. 363–70.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Andrieux, J. & Brunel, M.: 1977. ‘L’evolution de chaines occidentales du Pakistan’. Mem. h. ser. Soc. geol. France, 8, pp. 189–207.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Arthaud, F., Megard, F. & Seguret, M.: 1977. ‘Cadre tectonique de quelques bassins sedimentaires’. Bull. Centres. Rech. Explor. Prod. Elf-Aquitaine, 1, pp. 147–88.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Auden, J.B.: 1974. ‘Afghanistan-West Pakistan’. In: A.M. Spencer (ed.) Mesozoic-Cenozoic orogenic belts: data for orogenic studies. Spec. publ. Geol. Soc. London, 4, pp. 235–53.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Beaumont, C.: 1981. ‘Foreland basins’. Geophys. J. R. astronom. Soc., 65, pp. 291–329.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    White R.S.: 1979. ‘Deformation of the Makran continental margin’. In: A. Farah and K.A. DeJong (Eds.) Geodynamics of Pakistan. Geol. Surv. Pakistan, Quetta, pp. 295–304.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Platt, J.P. & Leggett, J.K.: 1984. ‘Slip vectors from the Neogene accretionary prism, Makran Coast, Pakistan (abs.)’. Neotectonics meeting, 5th December 1984, Newsletter Geol. Soc. London, 13(6), pp. 39–40.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Davis, D., Suppe, J. & Dahlen, F.A.: 1983. ‘Mechanics of fold and thrust belts and accretionary wedges’. J. Geophys. Res., 88, pp. 1153–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Burbank, D.W. & Tahirkheli, R.A.K. 1985. ‘The magnetostratigraphy, fission-track dating, and stratigraphie evolution of the Peshawar intermontane basin, northern Pakistan’. Bull. Geol. Soc. Am., 96, pp. 539–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Desio, A.: 1977. ‘Correlation entre les structures des chaines du nord-est de l’Afghanistan et du nord-ouest du Pakistan’. Mem. h. ser. Soc. geol. France, 8, pp. 179–88.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert W. H. Butler
    • 1
  • M. P. Coward
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Geological SciencesUniversity of DurhamDurhamUK
  2. 2.Department of Geology, Royal School of MinesImperial CollegeLondonUK

Personalised recommendations