Risk Assessment Issues Associated with Cleaning Up Inactive Hazardous Waste Sites

  • Elizabeth Anderson
  • Paul Chrostowski
  • Judy Vreeland
Chapter

Abstract

The broad practice of using risk assessment approaches for the evaluation of suspected human carcinogens is about 12 years old. The primary departure point was the announcement by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that adopted guidelines for assessing the risk of carcinogens and a policy to regulate suspect carcinogens based essentially on a risk management approach. The scientific basis was derived from the earlier experience of assessing the risk of health impacts from radiation exposure. From a practical standpoint, the use of risk assessment for carcinogens has received broad and general endorsement. The early use of risk assessment of carcinogens relied heavily on replacing the uncertainties in the risk assessment process with very conservative assumptions to ensure that the risk would in no case be underestimated. As the practice of risk assessment has become widespread, considerable attention has been focused on improving the scientific basis for evaluating each step of the risk assessment process: the weight-of-evidence indicating likely carcinogenicity, the dose-response relationships, and the environmental exposures. Chemicals that are thought to cause health or ecological effects through threshold mechanisms are also being evaluated by risk assessment approaches. More attention has been focused on the scientific relationships that underlie the characterization of suspect carcinogens and their dose-response relationships, including extrapolation from animals to humans and from high dose to low dose; far less attention has been focused on the exposure assessment, which can impact the outcome of the quantitative risk assessment by certainly as much as the assumptions in the dose-response extrapolation part of risk assessment.

Keywords

Risk Assessment Environmental Protection Agency Hazardous Waste Exposure Assessment Waste Site 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albert, R.E., R.E. Train, and E.L. Anderson (1977). Rationale developed by the Environmental Protection Agency for the assessment of carcinogenic risk. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 58:1537.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, E.L., and The Carcinogen Assessment Group (CAG) of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1983). Quantitative approaches in use to assess cancer risk. J. Risk Anal. 3(4):277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bouwer, E.J., B.E. Rittmann, and P.L. McCarty (1981). Anaerobic degradation of halogenated 1-and 2-carbon organic compounds. Environ. Sci. Technol. 15:596–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cline, P. V., and D.R. Viste (1984). Migration and degradation patterns of volatile organic compounds. Proceedings of the National Conference of Uncontrolled Hazardous Waste Sites, p. 217.Google Scholar
  5. Crump, K.S., H.A. Guess, and L.L. Deal (1977). Confidence intervals and test of hypotheses concerning dose-response relations inferred from animal carcinogenicity data. Biometrics 33:437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crump, K.S., and W.W. Watson (1979). A Fortran Program to Extrapolate Dichotomous Animal Carcinogenicity Data to Low Doses. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Contract No. 1-ES-2123.Google Scholar
  7. Crump, K.S. (1981). An improved procedure for low-dose carcinogenic risk assessment from animal data. J. Environ. Pathol. Toxicol. 52:675.Google Scholar
  8. Domenico, P.A., and V.V. Palciauskas (1982). Alternative boundaries in solid waste management. Groundwater 20:303.Google Scholar
  9. Enfield, C.J., R.F. Carsel, S.Z. Cohen, T. Phan, and D.M. Walters (1982). Approximating pollutant transport to groundwater. Groundwater 20(6):711–722.Google Scholar
  10. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (1976). Interim procedures and guidelines for health risks and economic impact assessments of suspected carcinogens. Fed. Reg. 41:21402.Google Scholar
  11. Environmental Protection Agency/Carcinogen Assessment Group (EPA/CAG) (1977). Preliminary Report on Ethylene Bisdithiocarbamate (EBDC).Google Scholar
  12. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (1984). Users Manual for the Pesticide Root Zone Model (PRZM), Release 1. Prepared by Carsel, R.F., et al. for Technology Development and Application Branch, Environmental Research Laboratory, Athens, Georgia. EPA-600/3-84-109.Google Scholar
  13. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (1985a). Final exclusions and final vertical and horizontal spread model (VHS). Fed. Reg. 50:229.Google Scholar
  14. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (1985b). Endangerment Assessment Handbook. Prepared by PRC, Environmental Management, Inc., for Office of Waste Programs Enforcement, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  15. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (1985c). Hazardous waste management system; Identification and listing of hazardous waste; proposed rule and request for comment. Fed. Reg. 50(38): 7896–7900.Google Scholar
  16. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (1986a). Guidelines for carcinogen risk assessment. Fed. Reg. 51(185):33991.Google Scholar
  17. Environmental Protection Agency/Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances (EPA/ OPTS) (1986b). Report of the Dioxin Update Committee.Google Scholar
  18. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (1986c). Guidelines for the health risk assessment of chemical mixtures. Fed. Reg. 51:34014.Google Scholar
  19. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (1986d). Superfund Public Health Evaluation Manual. Prepared by ICF, Inc., for Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Washington, DC. EPA 540/186/060.Google Scholar
  20. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (1986e). Guidelines for Groundwater Classification under the EPA Groundwater Protection Strategy. Office of Groundwater Protection, Office of Water, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  21. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (1987f). Fed. Reg. 50(38):7896–7900.Google Scholar
  22. Foster, S., and P. Chrostowski (1987). Inhalation exposures to volatile organic contaminants in the shower. Presented at 80th annual meeting of the Air Pollution Control Association, New York, June 21.Google Scholar
  23. Freeze, R.A., and J.A. Cherry (1979). Groundwater. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  24. Interagency Regulatory Liaison Group (IRLG) (1979). Scientific basis for the identification of potential carcinogens and estimation of risks. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 63:243.Google Scholar
  25. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) (1982). Monographs on the evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to humans. Supplement 4, Chemicals and Industrial Processes Associated with Cancer in Humans. Lyon, France, p. 7.Google Scholar
  26. Kobayashi, H., and B.E. Rittmann (1982). Microbial remediation of hazardous organic compounds. Environ. Sci. Technol. 16:170A–183A.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Levine, T., A. Rispin, C.S. Scott, W. Marcus, C. Chen, and H. Libb (1987). Special Report on Ingested Inorganic Arsenic: Skin Cancer; Nutritional Essentiality. Draft for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Science Advisory Board Review.Google Scholar
  28. Moolgavkar, S.H., and A.G. Knudson (1981). Mutation and cancer: A model for human carcinogenesis. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 66:1037.Google Scholar
  29. Moore, J.A. (1987). Recommended Agency Policy on the Carcinogenicity Risk Associated with the Ingestion of Inorganic Arsenic-Action Memorandum. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  30. National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council (NAS/NRC) (1983). Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process. Prepared by the Committee on the Institutional Means for Assessment of Risk to Public Health, Commission on Life Sciences. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  31. Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) (1985). Chemical carcinogens: Review of the science and its associated principles. Fed. Reg. 50:10372.Google Scholar
  32. Parsons, F., P.R. Wood, and J. DeMarco (1984). Transformation of tetrachloroethene and trichloroethane in microcosms and groundwater. Res. Technol. p. 56.Google Scholar
  33. Patrick, D., and W.D. Peters (1985). Exposure assessment in setting air pollution regulations: ASARCO, Tacoma, a case study. Presented at the Society for Risk Analysis annual meeting, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  34. Sawhney, B.L., J.J. Pignatello, and S.M. Steinberg (1988). Determination of 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) in field soils: Implications for volatile organic compounds. J. Environ. Qual. 17(1):149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sehmel, G.A., and W.H. Hodgson (1979). A Model for Predicting Dry Deposition of Particles and Gases to Environmental Surfaces. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy by Pacific Northwest Laboratory. PNL-SA-6271-REV 1.Google Scholar
  36. Shabecoff, P. (1988). EPA reassesses the cancer risk of many chemicals. New York Times. January 4, p. A1.Google Scholar
  37. Thorslund, T.W., G. Charnley, and E.L. Anderson (1986). Innovative Use of Toxicological Data to Improve Cost-Effectiveness of Waste Cleanup. Presented at Superfund ‘86: Management of Uncontrolled Hazardous Waste Sites, Washington, DC, December 1–3.Google Scholar
  38. Thorslund, T.W., C.C. Brown, and G. Charnley (1987). Biologically motivated cancer risk models. Risk Anal. 7:109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Umbreit, T.H., E.G. Hesse, and M.A. Gallo (1986). Bioavailability of dioxin in soil from a 2,4,5-T manufacturing site. Science 232:497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. van den Berg, M., M. van Greevenbroek, K. Olie, and O. Hutzinger (1986). Bioavailability of PCDDs and PCDFs on fly ash after semi-chronic ingestion by rat. Chemosphere 15:509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vogel, T.M., and P.L. McCarty (1985). Biotransformation of tetrachloroethylene to trichloroethylene, dichloroethylene, vinyl chloride, and carbon dioxide under methanogenic conditions. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 49:1080–1083.Google Scholar
  42. Walton, W.C. (1985). Practical Aspects of Groundwater Modeling. Second edition. National Water Well Association, Worthington, Ohio.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elizabeth Anderson
  • Paul Chrostowski
  • Judy Vreeland

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations