Woman — Nature, Product, Style? Rethinking the Foundations of Feminist Philosophy of Science

  • Sara Heinämaa
Part of the Synthese Library book series (SYLI, volume 256)

Abstract

Phenomenology questions the foundations of knowledge and science in a specific sense. It studies the meanings of the phenomena measured and generalized about in the empirical sciences: What do we mean, for example, by “natural processes”, by “nature”, “fact”, “culture”, “human being”, etc.? And it studies the meanings of concepts basic to science: knowledge, objectivity, mistake, false belief, etc. Understanding the philosophy of science broadly, we can say that phenomenology is a specific viewpoint or approach within it; it critically attends to the basic concepts at work in both the natural and human sciences.

Keywords

Down Syndrome Feminist Theory Feminist Criticism Feminist Study Gender Feature 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bigwood, Carol: 1991, ‘Renaturahzing the Body (With a Little Help from Merleau-Ponty)’,Hypatia, 6.3, 54–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Birke, Lynda: 1986,Women, Feminism and Biology: The Feminist Challenge. Brighton, Sussex: Havester PressGoogle Scholar
  3. Block, Ned: 1978, ‘Troubles with Functionalism’, in Wade Savage (ed.),Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science: Perception and Cognition: Issues in the Foundation of Psychology. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bordo, Susan: 1990, ‘Feminism, Postmodernism, and Gender-Scepticism’, in Linda J. Nicholson (ed.),Feminism/Postmodernism. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Braidotti, Rosi: 1991,Patterns of Dissonance: A Study of Women in Contemporary Philosophy, trans. Elizabeth Guild. Cambridge: Polity PressGoogle Scholar
  6. Braidotti, Rosi: 1994,Nomadic Subjects: Embodiment and Sexual Difference in Contemporary Feminist Theory. New York: Colombia University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Butler, Judith: 1986, ‘Sex and Gender in Simone de Beauvoir’s Second Sex’, Yale French Studies, No. 72, 35–49.Google Scholar
  8. Braidotti, Rosi: 1990a,Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Braidotti, Rosi: 1990b, ‘Gender Trouble, Feminist Theory, and Psychoanalytic Discourse’, in Linda J. Nicholson (ed.),Feminism/Postmodernism. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Braidotti, Rosi: 1992, ‘Gender’, in Elisabeth Wright (ed.),Feminism and Psychoanalysis: A Critical Dictionary. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  11. Braidotti, Rosi: 1994,Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex”. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Chanter, Tina: 1995,Ethics of Eros: Irigaray’s Rewriting of the Philosophers. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Chodorow, Nancy: 1978,The Reproduction of Mothering: Psychoanalysis and the Sociology of Gender. Berkeley, London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  14. Churchland, Paul M.: 1984/88,Matter and Consciousness: A Contemporary Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT.Google Scholar
  15. Cixous, Hélène: 1975/86, ‘Sorties: Out and Out: Attacks/Ways Out/Forays’, in Helen Cixous and Catherine Clément,The Newly Born Woman, trans. Betsy Wing, edited by Sandra M. Gilbert. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  16. de Beauvoir, Simone: 1949/93,Le deuxième sexe I: Les faits et les mythes. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  17. de Beauvoir, Simone: 1949/91,Le deuxième sexe II: L’expérience vécue. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  18. de Beauvoir, Simone: 1949/87,The Second Sex, trans, and edited by H. M. Parshley. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  19. de Lauretis, Teresa: 1987,The Technologies of Gender: Essays on Theory, Film, and Fiction. Bloomington, Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Descartes, René: 1641/90, ‘Meditations of First Philosophy’, trans. John Cottingham, in The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Descartes, René: 1649/90, ‘The Passions of the Soul’, trans. Robert Stoothoff, in The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Devor, Holly: 1989,Gender Blending: Confronting the Limits of Duality. Bloomington, Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Dillon, Martin C: 1988,Merleau-Ponty’s Ontology. Bloomington, Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Duran, Jane: 1991,Toward a Feminist Epistemology. Savage: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  25. Flax, Jane: 1990, ‘Postmodernism and Gender Relations in Feminist Theory’, in Linda J. Nicholson (ed.),Feminism/Postmodernism. New York and London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  26. Flax, Jane: 1993,Disputed Subjects: Essays on Psychoanalysis, Politics and Philosophy. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Fraser, Nancy and Linda Nicholson: 1990, ‘Social Criticism Without Philosophy: An encounter between feminism and postmodernism’, in Linda J. Nicholson (ed.),Feminism/Postmodernism. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Freud, Sigmund: 1920/90, ‘The Psychogenesis of a Case of Homosexuality in a Woman’, in Case Histories II, trans, under the general editorship of James Strachey. London, New.York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  29. Gatens, Moira: 1983/91, ‘A Critique of the Sex/Gender Distinction’, in Senja Gunew (ed.),A Reader in Feminist Knowledge. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Gilligan, Carol: 1982,In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Greer, Germaine: 1970/78,The Female Eunuch. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  32. Grosz, Elisabeth: 1994,Volatile Bodies: Toward a Corporeal Feminism. Bloomington, Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Haraway, Donna: 1991,Simians, Cyborgs, and Women. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Heinämaa, Sara: 1993, ‘Paikka tutkimuksessa: henkilökohtaisen paikanmäärityksen vaatimus naistutkimuksessa’,Naistutkimus/Kvinnoforskning, 6.1, 16–35; in English: ‘The Rhetoric of Positioning in Women’s Studies’,Nora: Nordic Journal of Women’s Studies, 2.2, 83–94.Google Scholar
  35. Heinämaa, Sara: 1995, ‘What is a Woman? Judith Butler and Simone de Beauvoir on the foundations of the sexual difference’, forthcoming in Hypatia.Google Scholar
  36. Heinamaa, Sara and Martina Reuter: 1994, ‘Naisten tunneherkkyys: filosofinen keskustelu tunteiden järjelhsyydestä’,Naistutkimus/Kvinnoforskning, 7.1, 4–20; in English ‘Reflections on the Rationality of Emotions and Feelings’, forthcoming in Drude von der Fehr, Anna G. Jónasdóttir and Bente Rosenbeck (eds.),Ambiguous Times.Google Scholar
  37. Honkasalo, Marja-Liisa: 1995, ‘Bodily Subjectivity in “Repressive” and “Avant-garde” Theories: Reflections on Maurice Merleau-Ponty and Julia Kristeva’. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  38. Humm, Maggie: 1990,The Dictionary of Feminist Theory. Columbus: Ohio State University.Google Scholar
  39. Husserl, Edmund: 1934–37/1954,Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie: Ein Einleitung in die phänomenologische Philosophie. Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  40. Irigaray, Luce: 1974/90,Speculum de l’autre femme. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
  41. Irigaray, Luce: 1977/83,Ce sexe qui n’en est pas un. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
  42. Irigaray, Luce: 1984,Éthique de la différence sexuelle. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
  43. Jay, Nancy: 1991, ‘Gender and Dichotomy’, in Senja Gunew (ed.),A Reader in Feminist Knowledge. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Kaplan, Gisela T. and Lesley J. Rogers: 1990, ‘The Definition of Male and Female: Biological reductionism and the sanctions of normality’, in Senja Gunew (ed.),Feminist Knowledge, Critique and Construct. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Kessler, Suzanne J.: 1990/94, ‘The Medical Construction of Gender: Case management of intersexed infants’, in Anne C. Herrmann and Abigail J. Steward (eds.),Theorizing Feminism: Parallel Trends in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Boulder, San Francisco: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  46. Kimura, Dorren: 1992, ‘Sex Differences in the Brain’,Scientific American, 267.3, 81–87.Google Scholar
  47. Kristeva, Julia: 1974/84,Revolution in Poetic Language, trans. Margaret Waller. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Kruks, Sonja: 1990,Situation and Human Existence: Freedom, Subjectivity and Society. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Kruks, Sonja: 1992, ‘Gender and Subjectivity: Simone de Beauvoir and contemporary feminism’,Signs, 18.1, 89–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Laqueur, Thomas: 1990/92,Making Sex: Body and Gender from Greeks to Freud. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  51. La Caze, Marguerite: 1994, ‘Simone de Beauvoir and Female Bodies’,Australian Feminist Studies, No. 20,91–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Le Dœuff, Michèle: 1979/80, ‘Simone de Beauvoir and Existentialism’,Feminist Studies, 6.2, 277–289.Google Scholar
  53. Le Dœuff, Michèle: 1989/91,Hipparchia’s Choice: An Essay Concerning Women, Philosophy Etc., trans. Trista Selous. Oxford and Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  54. Leigh Star, Susan: 1991, ‘The Politics of Right and Left’, in Senja Gunew (ed.). A Reader in Feminist Knowledge. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  55. Lloyd, Genevieve: 1984,The Man of Reason: “Male” and “Female” in Western Philosophy. London: Methuen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lorey, Isabell: 1993, ‘Der Körper als Text und das aktuelle Selbst: Butler und Foucault’,Feministische Studien, 11.1 11–23.Google Scholar
  57. Lundgren-Gothlin, Eva: 1991,Kön och eksistens: Studier in Simone de Beauvoir’s Le deuxième sexe. Göteborg: Daidalos; forthcoming in English 1996: Sex and Existence: Simone de Beauvoir’s The Second Sex. London: Athlona.Google Scholar
  58. Lundgren-Gothlin, Eva: 1995, ‘Gender and Ethics in the Philosophy of Simone de Beauvoir’,Nora: Nordic Journal of Women’s Studies, 3.1, 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Mead, Margaret: 1950/62,The Male and the Female: A Study of the Sexes in a Changing World. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin.Google Scholar
  60. Melden, A. I.: 1961/64,Free Action. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  61. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice: 1945/93,Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  62. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice: 1945/62,Phenomenology of Perception, trans. Colin Smith. New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  63. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice: 1960/64, ‘The Child’s Relations with Others’, trans. William Cobb, in The Primacy of Perception, edited by James M. Edie. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Millett, Kate: 1969/70,Sexual Politics. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
  65. Moi, Toril: 1988,Sexual/Textual Politics: Feminist Literary Theory. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  66. Moir, Anne and David Jessell: 1989,Brainsex. London: Mandarin.Google Scholar
  67. Mortensen, Ellen: 1994,The Feminine and Nihilism: Luce Irigaray with Nietzsche and Heidegger. Oslo, Copenhagen, Stockholm: Scandinavian University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Oakley, Ann: 1972,Sex, Gender and Society. London: Temple Smith.Google Scholar
  69. Oakley, Ann: 1981/82,Subject Woman. London: Fontana Press.Google Scholar
  70. Oudshoorn, Nelly: 1994,Beyond the Natural Body: An Archeology of Sex Hormones. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Reuter, Martina: 1995, ‘Philosophy Embodied: Merleau-Ponty and a feminist approach to eating ‘disorders’”. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  72. Rubin, Gayle: 1975, ‘The Traffic in Women: Notes on the “Political economy” of sex’, in Rayna R. Reiter (ed.),Toward an Anthropology of Women. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  73. Ruotsalainen, Ritva: 1995, ‘Kadotettu sukupuoli’,Tiede & editys, 20.4.Google Scholar
  74. Silverman, Hugh: 1991, ‘The Text of the Speaking Subject: Merleau-Ponty/Kristeva’, in Martin C. Dillon (ed.),Merleau-Ponty Vivant. Albany: State University of New York.Google Scholar
  75. Stern, Danile: 1985,The Interpersonal World of the Infant: A View from Psychoanalysis and Developmental Psychology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  76. Stoller, Robert, 1968/74; Sex and Gender: The Development of Femininity and Masculinity. London: Maresfield Reprints.Google Scholar
  77. Stoutland, Frederick: 1970, ‘The Logical Connection Argument’,American Philosophical Quarterly, 7, 117–129.Google Scholar
  78. Tuttle, Lisa: 1986,Encyclopedia of Feminism. New York and Oxford: Facts on File Publications.Google Scholar
  79. Unger, Rhoda and Mary Crawford: 1992,Women and Gender: A Feminist Psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  80. von Wright, Georg Henrik: 1971/93,Explanation and Understanding. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  81. Whitford, Margaret: 1991,Luce Irigaray: Philosophy in the Feminine. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  82. Wittgenstein, Ludwig: 1953/81,Philosophical Investigations, trans. G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Basil Black well.Google Scholar
  83. Young, Iris Marion: 1989, ‘Throwing Like a Girl: A phenomenology of the feminine body comportment, motility, and spatiality’, in Jeffner Allen and Iris Marion Young (eds.),The Thinking Muse: Feminism and Modern French Philosophy. Bloomington, Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  84. Young, Iris Marion: 1990,Throwing Like a Girl and Other Essays in Feminist Philosophy and Social Theory. Bloomington, Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  85. Zerilli, Linda: 1992, ‘A Process Without a Subject: Simone de Beauvoir and Julia Kristeva on maternity’,Signs, 18.1, 111–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sara Heinämaa
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyAcademy of Finland, University of HelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations