Percutaneously implantable endo-coronary prosthesis
Summary
A promising new approach to reduce post-dilatation restenosis is the use of self-expanding endocoronary scaffolding or wall stent device. So far we have implanted the stent in 25 coronary patients; in 24 of these patients this was done post-dilatation to prevent coronary restenosis, and in 1 case the stent was placed at a stenosis in a venous coronary artery bypass graft. There were 15 event-free implantations with excellent angiographic follow-up ranging from 3 to 12 months in 14 cases. Acute or early occlusion (before the tenth day post-implant) occurred in 10 cases, probably related to technical complications of the implantation in 2 cases, to inadequate heparinization in 3 cases, to previous transmural myocardial infarction distal to the stent in 3 cases, and to inadequate congruence between the stent and the native coronary artery in 2 cases. Thus, the risk of a thrombus is more acute in the first two weeks post-implant. However, we have noted that the rate of early occlusion is decreasing with our familiarization with the device, optimisation of the drug therapy and of the patient selection. Beyond this critical period, our preliminary results are encouraging and suggest that the intra-coronary stent might be a promising adjunct to transluminal coronary angioplasty.
Keywords
Coronary Angioplasty Wire Filament Native Coronary Artery Coronary Restenosis Early OcclusionPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Leimgruber PP, Roubin GS, Holtman J, Cotsonis GA, Meier B, Douglas JS, King III SB, Gruentzig AR: Restenosis after successful coronary angioplasty in patients with single-vessel disease. Circulation 73: 710 - 717, 1986.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Austin GE, Ratliff NB, Hollman J, Tabei S, Phillips DF: Intimal proliferation of smooth muscle cells as an explanation for recurrent coronary artery stenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 6: 369 - 375, 1985.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Sigwart U, Puel J, Mirkovitch V, Joffre F, Kappenberger L: Intravascular stents to prevent occlusion and restenosis after transluminal angioplasty. N Engl J Med 316: 701 - 706, 1987.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Puel J, Sigwart U, Joffre F, Rousseau H, Courtault A, Bounhoure JP: Percutaneously implantable endo-coronary prosthesis: Preliminary results in the treatment of post-dilation restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 9: 106A, 1987 (Abstract).Google Scholar
- 5.Dotter CT, Buschmann RW, McKinney MK, Rösch J: Transluminal expandable nitinol coil stent grafting: preliminary report. Radiology 147: 259 - 260, 1983.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.Cragg A, Lund G, Rysavy J, Castaneda F, Castaneda-Zuniga W, Amplatz K: Nonsurgical placement of arterial endoprostheses: a new technique using nitinol wire. Radiology 147: 261 - 263, 1983.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Maass D, Zollikofer CL, Largiader F, Senning A: Radiological follow-up of transluminally inserted vascular endoprostheses: an experimental study using expanding spirals. Radiology 152: 659 - 663, 1984.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 8.Palmaz JC, Sibbitt RR, Reuter SR, Tio FO, Rice WJ: Expandable intraluminal graft: a preliminary study. Radiology 156: 73 - 77, 1985.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Wright KC, Wallace S, Charnsangavej C, Carrasco CH, Gianturco C: Percutaneous endovascular stents: an experimental evaluation. Radiology 156: 69 - 72, 1985.PubMedGoogle Scholar