Absolute Population Estimates by Sampling a Unit of Habitat — Soil and Litter

  • T. R. E. Southwood

Abstract

The extraction methods described here can be used not only with soil and with plant and animal debris, litter and dung, but also with plant material collected by suction apparatus or other means, the nests of vertebrates and the mud from ponds and rivers. The actual methods for obtaining the samples from these other habitats are discussed in Chapters 4 and 6.

Keywords

Magnesium Sulphate Soil Animal Soil Nematode Flotation Method Soil Arthropod 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ABU YAMAN. I. K., 1960. Natural control in cabbage root fly populations and influence of chemicals. Meded. Landoogesch. Wageningen 60 (1), 1–57.Google Scholar
  2. AGUILAR, J. D., BENARD, R. and BESSARD, A., 1957. Une méthode de lavage pour l′extraction des arthropodes terricoles. Ann. Epiphyt. C 8, 91–9.Google Scholar
  3. ANDERSON, J M and HEALEY, I. N., 1970. Improvements in the gelatine-embedding technique for woodlands soil and litter samples. Pedobiologia 8, 108–20.Google Scholar
  4. AUCAMP, J. L, 1967. Efficiency of the grease film extraction technique in soil micro- arthropod survey. In Graff, O. & Satchell, J. E. (eds.), Progress in Soil Biology, pp. 515–24. North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  5. BALOGH, J. 1958. Lebensgemeinschaften der Landtiere.Budapest, 560 pp.Google Scholar
  6. BEL FIELD, W., 1956. The arthropoda of the soil in a West African pasture. J. Anim. Ecol. 25, 275–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. BERG, K, 1938. Studies on the bottom animals of Esrom Lake. K. danske Vidensk. Selsk., Skr. Nat. Math. Afd. 9, Raekke 8, 1–225.Google Scholar
  8. BIDLINGMAYER, W. L, 1957. Studies on Culicoides für ens(Poey) at Vero Beach. Mosq. News 17, 292–4.Google Scholar
  9. BIRKETT, L, 1957. Flotation technique for sorting grab samples. J. Comm. perm. int. Explor. Mer. 22, 289–92.Google Scholar
  10. BLOCK, W., 1966. Some characteristics of the Macfadyen high gradient extraction for soil micro-arthropods. Oikos 17, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. BOYD, J. M., 1958. Ecology of earthworms in cattle-grazed machair in Tiree, Argyll. J. Anim. Ecol. 27, 147–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. BRADY. J., 1969. Some physical gradients set up in Tullgren funnels during the extraction of mites from poultry litter. J. appi Ecol. 6, 391–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. BRIAN, M.V., 1970. Measuring population and energy flow in ants and termites. In Phillipson, J. (ed.)Methods of study in soil ecology, 231–4. UNESCO, Paris.Google Scholar
  14. BROWN, R. D., 1973. Funnel for extraction of leaf litter organisms. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 66, 485–6.Google Scholar
  15. BRUN DIN, L, 1949. Chironomiden und andere Bodentiere der Sudschwedischen Urgebirgsseen. Rep. Inst. Freshw. Res. Drottningholm 30, 915 pp.Google Scholar
  16. CAPSTICK, C K. 1959. The distribution of free-living nematodes in relation to salinity and the middle and upper reaches of the river Blyth estuary. J. Anim. Ecol. 28, 189–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. CLARK, E W. WILLIAMSON, A L and RICHMOND, C A., 1959. C.A., 1959. A collecting technique for pink bollworms and other insects using a Berlese funnel with an improved heater. J. econ. Ent. 52, 1010–12.Google Scholar
  18. COCKBILL. G. F., HENDERSON, V E., Ross, D M and STAPLEY, J. H., 1945. Wire-worm populations in relation to crop production. 1.A large-scale flotation method for extracting wireworms from soil samples and results from a survey of 600 fields. Ann. appl. Biol. 32, 148–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. COHEN, M, 1955. Soil sampling in the national agricultural advisory service. In Kevan, D.K. McE. (ed.), Soil Zoology, 347–50. University of Nottingham School of Agriculture.Google Scholar
  20. DANTHANARAYANA, W, 1966. Extraction of arthropod eggs from soil. Ent. exp. appl. 9, 124–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. DAVIES. J B and LINLEY. J B, 1966. A standardised flotation method for separating Leptoconops(Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) and other larvae from sand samples. Mosquito News 26, 440.Google Scholar
  22. DHILLON, B S and GIBSON, N H E, 1962. A study of the Acarina and Collembola of agricultural soils. 1. Numbers and distribution in undisturbed grassland. Pedobiologia 1, 189 -209. Google Scholar
  23. DIETRICK, E.J., SCHLINGER, E.I. and VAN DEN BOSCH, R., 1959. A new method for sampling arthropods using a suction collecting machine and modified Berlese funnel separator. J. econ. Ent. 52, 1085–91.Google Scholar
  24. DOANE, J.F., 1969. A method for separating the eggs of the prairie grain wireworm, Ctenicera destructor, from soil. Can. Ent. 101, 1002–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. DONDALE, C. D., NICHOLLS, C. F., REDNER, J. H., SEMPLE, R. B. AND TURNBULL, A.L., An improved Berlese-Tullgren funnel and a flotation separator for extracting grassland arthropods. Can. Ent. 103, 1549–52.Google Scholar
  26. DUFFEY, E. (A.G.)., 1962. A population study of spiders in limestone grassland. Description of study area, sampling methods and population characteristics. J. Anim. Ecol 31, 571–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. EDWARDS, C. A. and FLETCHER, K.E., 1970. Assessment of terrestrial invertebrate populations. In Phillipson, J. (ed.), Methods of study in soil ecology, UNESCO, Paris.Google Scholar
  28. EDWARDS, C. A., and LOFTY, J. R., 1975. The invertebrate fauna of the Park Grass Plots. 1. Soil fauna. Rep. Rothamsted exp. Sta. 1974, Part 2, 133–54.Google Scholar
  29. EDWARDS, C.A., WHITING, A.E. AND HEATH, G.W., 1970. A mechanized washing method for separation of invertebrates from soil. Pedobiologia 10, 141–8.Google Scholar
  30. ERMAN, D.C., 1973. Invertebrate movements and some diel and seasonal changes in a Sierra Nevada peatland. Oikos 24, 85–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. FORD, J., 1937. Fluctuations in natural populations of Collembola and Acarina. J. Anim. Ecol. 6, 98–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. FRICK, K.E., 1962. Ecological studies on the alkali bee, Nomia melanderi, and its Bombyliid parasite, Heterostylum robustum in Washington. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 55, 5–15.Google Scholar
  33. GABBUTT, P.D., 1959. The bionomics of the wood cricket, Nemobius sylvestris(Orthoptera: Gryllidae), J. Anim. Ecol. 28, 15–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. GERARD, B.M., 1967. Factors affecting earthworms in pastures. J. Anim. Ecol. 36, 235–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. GIFFORD, J R. and TRAHAN, G.B., 1969. Apparatus for removing overwintering adult rice water weevils from bunch grass. J. econ. Ent. 62, 752–4.Google Scholar
  36. GOFFART, H., 1959. Methoden zur Bodenuntersuchung auf nichtzystenbildende Nematodes Nachl. dtsch. Pfcienst, Stuttgart 11, 49–54.Google Scholar
  37. GOLIGHTLY, W.H., 1952. Soil sampling for wheat-blossom midges. Ann. appl. Biol. 39, 379–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. GOODEY, J. B., 1970. Laboratory methods for work with plant and soil nematodes. Tech. Bull Min. Agric. Lond. 2 (5th Ed.), H.M.S.O., London.Google Scholar
  39. GUIRAN, G. DE„ 1966. Infestation actuelle et infestation potentielle du sol par nematodes phytoparasites du genre Meloidogyne. C. R. Lebd. Seanc. Acad. Sci. (Paris) 262, 1754–6.Google Scholar
  40. HAARLOV, N., 1947. A new modification of the Tullgren apparatus. J. Anim. Ecol. 16, 115–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. HAARLOV, N. and WEIS-FOGH, T., 1953. A microscopical technique for studying the undisturbed texture of soils. Oikos 4, 44–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. HAARLOV, N. and WEIS-FOGH, T., 1955. A microscopical technique for studying the undisturbed texture of soils. In Kevan, D. K. M. (ed.), Soil Zoology 429–32. University of Nottingham School of Agriculture.Google Scholar
  43. HADLEY, M., 1971. Aspects of the larval ecology and population dynamics of Niolophilus ater Meigen (Diptera: Tipulidae) on Pennine Moorland. J. Anim. Ecol. 40, 445–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. HAIRSTON, N. G., HUBENDICK, B., WATSON, J. M., and OLIVER, L. J., 1958. An evaluation of techniques used in estimating snail populations. Bull. Wld Hlth Org. 19, 661–72.Google Scholar
  45. HALE, W. G., 1964. A flotation method for extracting Collembola from organic soils. J. Anim. Ecol. 33, 363–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. HAMMER, M., 1944. Studies on the Oribatids and Collemboles of Greenland. Medd. Gronland 141, 1–210.Google Scholar
  47. HEATH, G. W., 1965. An improved method for separating arthropods from soil samples. Lab. Pract.April 1965.Google Scholar
  48. HORSFALL, W.R., 1956. A method for making a survey of floodwater mosquitoes. Mosquito News 16, 66–71.Google Scholar
  49. HUGHES, R. D., 1960. A method of estimating the numbers of cabbage root fly pupae in the soil. Plant Path. 9, 15–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. IVERSEN, T.M., 1971. The ecology of the mosquito population (Aedes communis) in a temporary pool in a Danish beech wood. Arch. Hydrobiol. 69, 309–32.Google Scholar
  51. JACOT, A.P., 1935. Molluscan populations of old growth forests and rewooded fields in the Asheville basin of N. Carolina. Ecology 16, 603–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. JONASSON, P. M., 1955. The efficiency of sieving techniques for sampling freshwater bottom fauna. Oikos 6, 183–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. KEMPSON, D., LLOYD, M., and GHELARDI, R. 1963. A new extractor for woodland litter. Pedobiologia 3, 1–21.Google Scholar
  54. KEVAN, D. K. MCE. (ed.), 1955. Soil Zoology, Proceedings of the University of Nottingham second Easter School in Agricultural Science, 1955.London, 512 pp.Google Scholar
  55. KEVAN, D. K. MCE., 1962. Soil animals, 237 pp., Witherby, London.Google Scholar
  56. KING, A.B.S., 1975. The extraction, distribution and sampling of the eggs of the sugarcane froghopper, Aeneolamia varia saccharina(Dist.) (Homoptera, Cercopidae). Bull. ent. Res. 65, 157–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. KIRITANI, K and MATUZAKI, T., 1969. On the extraction rate of nematodes by the Baermann funnel. Bull. Kochi Inst. Agr. For. Sci. 2, 25–30.Google Scholar
  58. KITCHING, R. L., 1971. Acore samplerfor semi-fluid substances. Hydrobiologia 37, 205–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. KRAAN, C. VAN DER., 1973. Populationsokologische untersuchungen an Hypogastrura vintica Tullb. 1872 (Collembola) anf Schiermonnikoog. Faun-okol. Mitt. 4, 197–206.Google Scholar
  60. LADELL, W. R. S, 1936. A new apparatus for separating insects and other arthropods from the soil. Ann. appl. Biol. 23, 862–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. LANE, M., and SHIRCK, E., 1928. A soil sifter for subterranean insect investigations. J. econ. Ent. 21, 934–6.Google Scholar
  62. LANGE, W. H., AKESSON, N. B., and CARLSON, E. C., 1955. A power-driven self-propelled soil sifter for subterranean insects. In Kevan, D. K. M. (ed.), Soil Zoology 351–5. University of Nottingham School of Agriculture.Google Scholar
  63. LASEBIKAN, B. A., 1971. The relationship between temperature and humidity and the efficient extraction of Collembola by a dynamic-type method. Rev. Ecol. Biol. Sol. 8, 287–93.Google Scholar
  64. LAURENCE, B. R., 1954. The larval inhabitants of cow pats. J. Anim. Ecol. 23, 234–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. LINCOLN, C., and PALM, C. E., 1941. Biology and ecology of the Alfalfa Snout beetle. Mem. Cornell Univ. agric. Exp. Sta. 236, 3–45.Google Scholar
  66. MACFADYEN, A., 1953. Notes on methods for the extraction of small soil arthropods. J. Anim. Ecol. 22, 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. MACFADYEN, A., 1955. A comparison of methods for extracting soil arthropods. In Kevan, D. K. M. (ed.). Soil Zoology 315–32. University of Nottingham School of Agriculture.Google Scholar
  68. MACFADYEN, A., 1961. Improved funnel-type extractors for soil arthropods. J. Anim. Ecol. 30, 171–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. MACFADYEN, A, 1962. Soil arthropod sampling. Adv. Ecol. Res. 1, 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. MACFADYEN, A., 1968. Notes on methods for the extraction of small soil arthropods by the high gradient apparatus. Pedobiologia 8, 401–6.Google Scholar
  71. MCLEOD, J. M., 1961. A technique for the extraction of cocoons from soil samples during population studies of the Swaine sawfly, Neodiprion swainei Midd. (Hy- menoptera: Diprionidae). Can. Ent. 91, 888–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. MASON, C F., 1970. Snail populations, beech litter production and the role of snails in litter decomposition. Oecologia (Berl.) 5, 215–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. MILNE, A., COGGINS, R. E. and LAUGHLIN, R., 1958. The determination of numbers of leatherjackets in sample turves. J. Anim. Ecol. 27, 125–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. MINDERMAN, G., 1957. The preparation of microtome sections of unaltered soil for the study of soil organisms in situ. Plant Soil 8, 42–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. MÜLLER, G., 1962. A centrifugal-flotation extraction technique and its comparison with two funnel extractors. In Murphy, P. W. (ed.), Progress in Soil Zoology 207–11. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
  76. MURPHY, P. W., 1955. Notes on processes used in sampling, extraction and assessment of the meiofauna of heathland. In Kevan, D. K. M. (ed.), Soil Zoology 338–40. University of Nottingham School of Agriculture.Google Scholar
  77. MURPHY, P. W., (ed.), 1962a. Progress in Soil Zoology. Papers from a colloquium on Research methods organised by the Soil Zoology Committee of the International Society of Soil Science held at Rothamsted Experimental Station Hertfordshire 10–14th July, 1958. 398 pp., Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
  78. MURPHY, P. W., 1962 b. Extraction methods for soil animals. I. Dynamic methods with particular reference to funnel processes. In Murphy, P. W. (ed.), Progress in Soil Zoology 75–114. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
  79. MURPHY, p. w., 1962c. Extraction methods for soil animals. II. Mechanical methods. In Murphy, P. W. (ed.), Progress in Soil Zoology 115–55. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
  80. NEF, L., 1960. Comparison de l′efficacité de différentes variantes de l′appareil de Berlese-Tullgren. Z. angew. Ent. 46, 178–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. NEF, L., 1970. Reactions des acariens a une dessication lente de la litiere. Rev. Ecol. Biol. Sol. 7, 381–92.Google Scholar
  82. NEF, L., 1971. Influence de l′humidité sur le geotactisme des Oribates (Acarina) dans l′entracteur de Berlese-Tullgren. Pedobiologia 11, 433–45.Google Scholar
  83. NELSON, J. M and SATCHELL, J. E., 1962. The extraction of Lumbricidae from soil with special reference to the hand-sorting method. In Murphy, P. W. (ed.), Progress in Soil Zoology 294–9. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
  84. NEWELL, I., 1955. An autosegregator for use in collecting soil-inhabiting arthropods. Trans. Amer. Microsc. Soc. 74, 389–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. NIELSEN, C. OVERGAARD., 1952–53. Studies on Enchytraeidae 1. A technique for extracting Enchytraeidae from soil samples. Oikos 4, 187–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. NORDSTROM, S. and RUNDGREN, S., 1972. Methods of sampling lumbricids. Oikos 23, 344–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. O′CONNOR, F. B., 1955. Extraction of enchytraeid worms from a coniferous forest soil. Nature 175, 815–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. O′CONNOR, F. B., 1957. An ecological study of the Enchytraeid worm population of a coniferous forest soil. Oikos 8, 162–99.Google Scholar
  89. O′CONNOR, F. B., 1962. The extraction of Enchytraeidae from soil. In Murphy, P. W. (ed.), Progress in Soil Zoology 279–85. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
  90. ØKLAND, F., 1929. Methodik einer quantitativen Untersuchung der Landschnecken- fauna. Arch. Molluskenk. 61, 121–36.Google Scholar
  91. OOSTENBRINK, M., 1954. Een doelmatige methode voor het toetsen van aaltjesbestrijd- ingsmiddelen in grond met Hoplolaimus uniformis als proefdier. Meded. Landb Hoogesch. Gent. 19, 37 7–408.Google Scholar
  92. OOSTENBRINK, M., 1970. Comparison of techniques for population estimation of soil and plant nematodes. In Phillipson, J. (ed.), Methods of study in soil ecology, 249–55, UNESCO, Paris.Google Scholar
  93. OVERGAARD, C. [NIELSEN, C. OVERGAARD], 1947–48. An apparatus for quantitative extraction of nematodes and rotifers from soil and moss. Natura juti 1, 271–8.Google Scholar
  94. PANDE, Y. D. and BERTHET, P., 1973. Comparison of the Tullgren funnel and soil section methods for surveying Oribatid populations. Oikos 24, 273–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. PARIS, O H. and PITELKA, F. A., 1962. Population characteristics of the terrestrial Isopod Armadillidium vulgare in California grassland. Ecology 43, 229–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. PARK, O. AND AUERBACH, S., 1954. Further study of the tree-hole complex with emphasis on quantitative aspects of the fauna. Ecology 35, 208–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. PASK, W. M AND COSTA, R. M., 1971. Efficiency of sucrose flotation in recovering insect larvae from benthic steam samples. Can. Ent. 103, 1649–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. PEACHEY, J. E., 1962. A comparison of two techniques for extracting Enchytraeidae from moorland soils. In Murphy, P. W. (ed), Progress in Soil Zoology 286–93. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
  99. PETERS, B. G., 1955. A note on simple methods of recovering nematodes from soil. In Kevan, D. K. M. (ed.), Soil Zoology 373–4. University of Nottingham School of Agriculture.Google Scholar
  100. PHILLIPSON, J., 1970. Methods of study in soil ecology. 303pp, UNESCO, Paris.Google Scholar
  101. PINDER, L C. V., 1974. The ecology of slugs in potato crops, with special reference to the differential susceptibility of potato cultivars to slug damage. J. appl. Ecol. 11, 439–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. POTZGER, J. E., 1955. A borer for sampling in permafrost. Ecology 36, 161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. PRICE, D. W., 1975. Vertical distribution of small arthropods in a Californian Pine Forest soil. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 68, 174–80.Google Scholar
  104. RAPOPORT, E. H. and OROS, E., 1969. Transporte y manipuleo de las muestras de suelo y su efecto sobre la micro y mesofauna. Rev. Ecol. Biol. Soc. 6, 31–9.Google Scholar
  105. RAW, F, 1955. A flotation extraction process for soil micro-arthropods. In Kevan, D. K. M. (ed.), Soil Zoology 341–6. University of Nottingham School of agriculture.Google Scholar
  106. RAW, F., 1959. Estimating earthworm populations by using formalin. Nature 184, 1661–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. RAW, F., 1960. Earthworm population studies: a comparison of sampling methods. Nature 187, 257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. RAW, F., 1962. Flotation methods for extracting soil arthropods. In Murphy, P. W. (ed.), Progress in Soil Zoology 199–201. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
  109. READ, D. C., 1958. Note on a flotation apparatus for removing insects from soil. Can. J. PL Sci. 38, 511–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. SALT, G. AND HOLLICK, F.S.J., 1944. Studies of wireworm populations. 1. A census of wireworms in pasture. Ann. appl. Biol. 31, 53–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. SANDS, W. A., 1972. Problems in attempting to sample tropical subterranean termite populations. Ekologia Polsha 20, 23–31.Google Scholar
  112. SATCHELL, J. E., 1955. An electrical method of sampling earthworm populations. In Kevan, D. K. M. (ed.), Soil Zoology 356–64. University of Nottingham School of Agriculture.Google Scholar
  113. SATCHELL, J E and NELSON, J M., 1962. A comparison of the Tullgren-funnel and flotation methods of extracting acarina from woodland soil. In Murphy, P. W. (ed.), Progress in Soil Zoology 212–16. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
  114. SAUNDERS, L. G., 1959. Methods for studying Forcipomyia midges, with special reference to cacao-pollinating species (Diptera, Ceratopogonidae). Can. J. Zool. 37, 33–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. SCHJOTZ-CHRISTENSEN, B., 1957. The beetle fauna of the Corynephoretum in the ground of the Mols Laboratory, with special reference to Cardiophorus asellus Er. (Elateridae). Natura Jutl. 6–7, 1–120.Google Scholar
  116. SEINHORST, J. W., 1950. De betekenis van de toestand van de grond voor het optreden van aantasting door het stengelaaltje Ditylenchus dipsaci(Kuhn) Filipjev. Tijdschr. PL Ziekt. 56, 269.Google Scholar
  117. SEINHORST, J. W., 1962. Extraction methods for nematodes inhabiting soil. In Murphy, P. W. (ed.), Progress in Soil Zoology 243–56. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
  118. SELLMER, G. P., 1956. A method for the separation of small bivalve molluscs from sediments. Ecology 37, 206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. SERVICE, M.W., 1968. A method for extracting mosquito eggs from soil samples taken from oviposition sites. Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 62, 478–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. SHAW, G. G., 1970. Grease-film extraction of an arthropod: a modification for organic soils. J. econ. Ent. 63, 1323–4.Google Scholar
  121. SOLOMON, M.E., 1962. Notes on the extraction and quantitative estimation of Acaridiae (Acarina). In Murphy, P. W. (ed.), Progress in Soil Zoology 306–7. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
  122. SOUTH, A., 1964. Estimation of slug populations. Ann. appl. Biol. 53, 251–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. SPEIGHT, M. C. D., 1973. A greased-belt technique for the extraction of arthropods from organic debris. Pedobiologia 13, 99–106.Google Scholar
  124. STAGE, H. H., GJULLIN, C. M. and YATES, W. W„ 1952. Mosquitoes of the Northwestern States. U.S.D.A., Agric. Handb. 46, 95 pp.Google Scholar
  125. STEPHENSON, J. W., 1962. An improved final sieve for use with the Salt and Hollick soilwashing apparatus. In Murphy, P. W. (ed.), Progress in Soil Zoology 202–3. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
  126. STEWART, K M., 1974. A three-dimensional net sieve for extracting Tipulidae (Diptera) larvae from pasture soil. J. app. Ecol. 11, 427–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. SUGIMOTO, T., 1967. Application of oil-water flotation method to the extraction of larvae and pupae of aquatic midges from a soil sample. Jap. J. Ecol. 17, 179–82.Google Scholar
  128. SUNDERLAND, K. D., HASSELL, M. and SUTTON, S. L., 1976. The population dynamics of Philoscia muscorum(Crustacea, Oniscoidea) in a dune grassland ecosystem. J. Anim. Ecol. 45, 487–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. SVENDESN, J. A., 1955. Earthworm population studies: a comparison of sampling methods. Nature 175, 864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. TANTON, M. T., 1969. A corer for sampling soil and litter arthropods. Ecology 5, 134–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. TôRNE, E. VON, 1962a. An elutriation and sieving apparatus for extracting micro- arthropods from soil. In Murphy, P. W. (ed.), Progress in Soil Zoology 204–6. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
  132. TôRNE, E. VON, 1962b. A cylindrical tool for sampling manure and compost. In Murphy, P. W. (ed.), Progress in Soil Zoology 240–2. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
  133. VâGVûLGYI, J., 1953 (1952). A new sorting method for snails, applicable also for quantitative researches. Ann. Hist. Nat. Mus. Nat. Hung. 44 (N.S. 3), 101–4.Google Scholar
  134. VANNIER, G., 1965. Enceinte réfrigérée par modules thermoélectriques à effet Pether (+ 30° C a — 40° C) permettant l′observation directe de la microfaune. Rev. Ecol. Biol. Sol. 2, 489–506.Google Scholar
  135. VANNIER, G. and ALPERN, I., 1968. Techniques de prélèvements pour l′étude des distribution horizontales et verticales des microarthropodes du sol. Rev. Ecol. Biol. Sol. 5, 225–35.Google Scholar
  136. VANNIER, G., and VIDAL, P., 1964. Construction d′un appareil automatique pour couper les inclusions de sol dans la gelatine. Rev. Ecol. Biol. Sol. 1, 575–86.Google Scholar
  137. VANNIER, G. and VIDAL, P., 1965. Sonde pédologique pour l′échantillonnage des microarthropodes. Rev. Ecol. Biol. Sol. 2, 333–7.Google Scholar
  138. WALLACE, M. M. H., 1956. A rapid method of sampling small free-living pasture insects and mites. J. Aust. Inst, agric. Sci. 22, 283–4.Google Scholar
  139. WEBLEY, D., 1957. A method of estimating the density of frit fly eggs in the field. Plant Path. 6, 49–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. WEBSTER, J. M., 1962. The quantitative extraction of Ditylenchus dipsaci(Kuhn) from plant tissues by a modified Seinhorst mistifier. Nematologica 8, 245–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. WHITEHEAD, A. G. and HEMMING, J. R., 1965. A comparison of some quantitative methods of extracting small vermiform nematodes from soil. Ann. appl. Biol. 55, 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. WILLIAMS, R. W., 1960a. A new and simple method for the isolation of fresh water invertebrates from soil samples. Ecology 41, 573–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. WILLIAMS, R. W., 1960b. Quantitative studies on populations of biting midge larvae in saturated soil from two types of Michigan bogs (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae). J. Parasit. 46, 565–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. WILLIAMSON, M. H., 1959. The separation of molluscs from woodland leaf-litter. J. Anim. Ecol. 28, 153–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© T. R. E. Southwood 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. R. E. Southwood
    • 1
  1. 1.University of OxfordUK

Personalised recommendations