Unification of the Concepts of Quantum Ensembles and Potential Possibilities

  • A. A. Tyapkin
Conference paper
Part of the Fundamental Theories of Physics book series (FTPH, volume 24)

Abstract

This report mainly deals with a possibility of establishing the objective status of quantum mechanics and with closer definition of some principles in the quantum measurements. The report also touches on some aspects in the development of the interpretation of quantum mechanics related to the explanation of interference effects in experiments with single quantum objects.

Keywords

Statistical Ensemble Potential Possibility Classical Statistical Mechanic Copenhagen Interpretation Soviet Scientist 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Tyapkin A. A., 1966: Report at the Conference devoted to the 40th Anniversary of Quantum Mechanics, Dubna. Published in:Google Scholar
  2. 1.A)
    1968: Preprint E4-3687, JINR, Dubna, (in English). ’Development of Statistical Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics by Means of the Joint Coordinate-Momentum Representation’.Google Scholar
  3. 1.B)
    1970: In the Proceedings of the Dubna Conference 1966 Philosophical Aspects of Quantum Mechanics, Moscow, ″Nauka″, p. 139-180 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  4. 1.C)
    1972: L″interpretazione Materialistica Delia Meccanica Quantistica. Fisica e Filosofia in URSS, Feltrinelli Editore Milano, p. 413-448 (in Italian)Google Scholar
  5. 2.
    This idea was formulated in the work 1 a) as follows:... The hidden be Broglie waves can correspond to the real physical process in vacuum which is related to the motion of the mechanical microobject and manifesting its existence only by affecting the virtual process of vacuum effects on the same mechanical system. Attention should be paid to the principal difference of this assumption from the earlier discussed ideas of the wavepilot or an idea of a double solution according to which the wave controls the microparticle motion in space and time but not the stochastic process of virtual interaction with vacuum. ... However, the very idea of separating quantum-mechanical object both into the micro-particle itself carrying real energy and capable of performing real (not virtual) effects used in measurements and into the hidden directly not observed wave process in vacuum producing stochastic effects on the micro-particle, the very idea is still the only possibility to uniquely explain without any logical and physical contradiction the interference effects of a single particle. ... Unfortunately, this possibility of explaining has not been discussed seriously either by N. Bohr or any other physicists.Google Scholar
  6. 3.
    Selleri F., 1969: Lett.Nuovo Cim., Ser.1, 1, p. 908.Google Scholar
  7. 4.
    Selleri F., 1982: Found, of Phys., 12, No 11, p. 1087.CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. A. Tyapkin
    • 1
  1. 1.Joint Institute for Nuclear ResearchHead Post OfficeMoscowUSSR

Personalised recommendations