Self-Reported and Official Offending from Adolescence to Adulthood

  • David P. Farrington
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (ASID, volume 50)

Abstract

The research reported in this chapter had three major objectives. The first was to study the prevalence of different types of offending, as measured by self-reports and official convictions, of the same sample at different ages from adolescence to adulthood. The second was to investigate the relationship between self-reported and official offending of the same sample at different ages, and hence to advance knowledge about the concurrent and predictive validity of self-reports in comparison with official records. The third was to study the relationship between offending at one age and offending at another, as measured by both self-reports and official convictions, and hence to advance knowledge about the issues of continuity or discontinuity and specialization or versatility in offending.

Keywords

Transition Matrice Slot Machine Sample Male Sickness Benefit Previous Admission 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bachman, JG, O’Malley, PM, & Johnston, J: Youth in transition, vol.6. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Institute for Social Research, 1978.Google Scholar
  2. Blumstein, A, Cohen, J, & Farrington, DP: Criminal career research: Its value for criminology. Criminology, 26:1–35, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cernkovich, SA, Giordano, PC, & Pugh, MD: Chronic offenders: The missing cases in self-report delinquency research. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 76:705–32, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dunford, FW, & Elliott, DS: Identifying career offenders using self-reported data. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 21:57–86, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Elliott, DS, Huizinga, D, & Menard, S: Multiple problem youth. New York: Springer-Verlag, in press (1989).Google Scholar
  6. Farrington, DP: Self-reports of deviant behavior: Predictive and stable? Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 64: 99–110, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Farrington, DP: The effects of public labeling. British Journal of Criminology, 17:112–25, 1977.Google Scholar
  8. Farrington, DP: Offending from 10 to 25 years of age. In Van Dusen, KT, & Mednick, SA (Eds.), Prospective studies of crime and delinquency (pp.17–37). Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff, 1983.Google Scholar
  9. Farrington, DP: Age and crime. In Tonry, M, & Morris, N (Eds.), Crime and justice, vol.7 (pp. 189–250). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986.Google Scholar
  10. Farrington, DP: Later adult life outcomes of offenders and nonoffenders. In Brambring, M, Lösel, F, & Skowronek, H (Eds.), Children at risk. Berlin: De Gruyter, in press (1989).Google Scholar
  11. Farrington, DP, Gallagher, B, Morley, L, St. Ledger, R, & West, DJ: Minimizing attrition in longitudinal research: Methods of tracing and securing cooperation in a 24-year longitudinal study. In Magnusson, D, & Bergman, L (Eds.), Methodology of longitudinal research. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, in press (1989).Google Scholar
  12. Farrington, DP, Snyder, HS, & Finnegan, TA: Specialization in juvenile court careers. Criminology, 26:461–87, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Farrington, DP, & West, DJ: The Cambridge study in delinquent development. In Mednick, SA, & Baert, AE, (Eds.), Prospective longitudinal research (pp. 137–45). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  14. Gottfredson, M, & Hirschi, T: Science, public policy, and the career paradigm. Criminology, 25:37–55, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hindelang, MJ, Hirschi, T, & Weis, JG: Measuring delinquency. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1981.Google Scholar
  16. Huizinga, D, & Elliott, DS: Reassessing the reliability and validity of self-report delinquency measures. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 2:293–327, 1986.Google Scholar
  17. Langan, PA, & Farrington, DP: Two-track or one-track justice? Some evidence from an English longitudinal survey. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 74, 519–46, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Le Blanc, M, & Frechette, M: Male criminal activity from childhood through youth. New York: Springer-Verlag, in press (1989).Google Scholar
  19. Petersilia, J, Greenwood, PW, & Lavin, M: Criminal careers of habitual felons. Washington, DC: National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice, 1978.Google Scholar
  20. Rankin, JH, & Wells, LE: From status to delinquent offenses: Specialization? Journal of Criminal Justice, 13:171–80, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. West, DJ: Present conduct and future delinquency. London: Heinemann, 1969.423Google Scholar
  22. West, DJ: Delinquency: Its roots, careers, and prospects. London: Heinemann, 1982.Google Scholar
  23. West, DJ, & Farrington, DP: Who becomes delinquent? London: Heinemann. 1973.Google Scholar
  24. West, DJ, & Farrington, DP: The delinquent way of life. London: Heinemann, 1977.Google Scholar
  25. Williams, JR, & Gold, M: From delinquent behavior to official delinquency. Social Problems, 20:209–29, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wolfgang, ME, Figlio, RM, & Sellin, T: Delinquency in a birth cohort. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1972.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • David P. Farrington
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of CriminologyCambridge UniversityCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations