Presuppositions of Induction

  • Brian Skyrms
Part of the Synthese Library book series (SYLI, volume 206)

Abstract

We may be far from an adequate account of good scientific method, but however such an account might turn out, it is hard to believe that it would not have a significant contrast. There will presumably be logically consistent ways of assimilating evidence which count as bad science, or unscientific or outright mad. To this extent, at the very least, scientific method will have its presuppositions.1 An examination of the presuppositions of scientific induction is nothing other than an analysis of scientific method itself.

Keywords

Relative Frequency Ergodic Theorem Infinite Sequence Finite Sequence Modal Force 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Asquith, P. and I. Hacking (eds.): 1978, PSA 78 II, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing.Google Scholar
  2. Baracca, A., D. J. Böhm, B. J. Hiley, A. E. Stuart: 1975, ‘On some new notions concerning locality and non-locality in the quantum theory’, // Nuovo Cimento 28B, pp. 453–464.Google Scholar
  3. Bell, J. S.: 1964, ‘On the Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen Paradox’, Physics I, pp. 195–200.Google Scholar
  4. Bell, J. S.: 1971, ‘Introduction to the hidden variable question’, in Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, ed. B. d’Espagnat, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Billingsley, P.: 1965, Ergodic Theory and Information, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Burks, A.: 1979, Chance, Cause, Reason, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  7. DeFinetti, B.: 1937, ‘La prevision: ses lois logiques, ses sources subjectives’, Annals de VInstitut Henri Poincare 7. Translated as ‘Foresight: Its logical laws, its subjective sources’ in Kyburg and Smokier, (1964).Google Scholar
  8. DeFinetti, B.: 1938, ‘Sur la condition d’equivalence partielle’, Actualities Scientific et Industrielles no. 739, Hermann & Cie, Paris. Translated as ‘On the condition of partial exchangeability’, in Jeffrey (1980), pp. 193–204.Google Scholar
  9. DeFinetti, B.: 1970, Theory of Probability, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  10. DeFinetti, B.: 1974, Probability, Induction and Statistics, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Diaconis, P.: 1977, ‘Finite forms of “Definetti’s theorem on exchangeability”’ Synthese 36 pp. 271–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Diaconis, P. and D. Freedman: 1980a, ‘DeFinetti’s generalizations of exchangeability’, in Jeffrey (1980, pp. 233–249).Google Scholar
  13. Diaconis, P. and D. Freedman: 1980b, ‘DeFinetti’s theorem for Markov chains’, Annals of Probability 8 no. 1, pp. 115–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Diaconis, P. and D. Freedman: 1980c, ‘Finite exchangeable sequences’, Annals of Probability 8 no. 4, pp. 745–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dynkin, E. B.: 1978, ‘Sufficient statistics and extreme points’, Annals of Probability 6 no.5, pp. 705–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. d’Espagnat, B.: 1978, The Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Mechanics 2nd ed., Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  17. d’Espagnat, B.(ed.): 1971, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Farrell, R. H.: 1962: ‘Representation of invariant measures’, Illinois Journal of Mathematics 6, pp. 447–467.Google Scholar
  19. Fine, T.: 1973, Theories of Probability, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Freedman, D.: 1962, ‘Invariants under mixing which generalize DeFinetti’s Theorem’, Annals of Mathematical Statistics 33, pp. 916–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Furry, W. H.: 1936, ‘Note on the quantum mechanical theory of measurement’, Physical Review 49, pp. 393–399; 476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Georgii, H. O.: 1979, Canonical Gibbs Measures: Lecture Notes in Mathematics 780, Springer Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  23. Halmos, P.: 1956, Lectures on Ergodic Theory, Math. Soc. Japan, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  24. Harper, W., R. Stalnaker, and W. Pearce (eds.): 1980, Ifs, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  25. Hawking, S.W. and G.F.R. Ellis: 1973, The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hewett, E. and L.J. Savage: 1955, ‘Symmetric measures on Cartesian products’, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 80, pp. 470–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jeffrey, R. C: 1965, The Logic of Decision, McGraw Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  28. Jeffrey, R. C: 1980, Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability II, University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  29. Kyburg, H. and B. Smokier: 1964, Studies in Subjective Probability, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  30. Lewis, D.: 1980, ‘A subjectivist’s guide to objective chance’ in Jeffrey (1980), pp. 263–294.Google Scholar
  31. Link, G.: 1980, Representation theorems of the DeFinetti type for (partially) symmetric probability measures, in effrey (1980), pp. 207–231.Google Scholar
  32. Mackey, G. W.: 1974, ‘Ergodic theory, and its significance for statistical mechanics and probability theory’, Advances in Mathematics 12, pp. 178–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Martin-Löf, P.: 1966, ‘The definition of a random sequence’, Information and Control 9, pp. 602–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Oxtoby, J. C: 1952, ‘Ergodic sets’, Bull. American Mathematical Soc. 58, pp. 116–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Preston, C: 1979, Random Fields: Lecture Notes in Mathematics 760, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.Google Scholar
  36. Ruelle, D.: 1969, Statistical Mechanics, Benjamin, New York, esp. Ch. 6.Google Scholar
  37. Sinai, Ya.G.: 1976, Introduction to Ergodic Theory Princeton University Press and University of Tokyo Press, Princeton and Tokyo.Google Scholar
  38. Skyrms, B.: 1977, ‘Resiliency, propensity and causal necessity’, Journal of Philosophy 74, pp. 704–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Skyrms, B.: 1978, ‘Statistical laws and personal propensities’, in Asquith and Hacking (1978), pp. 551–562.Google Scholar
  40. Skyrms, B.: 1979, ‘Randomness and physical necessity’, Pittsburgh Lecture in the Philosophy of Science.Google Scholar
  41. Skyrms, B.: 1980, Causal Necessity, Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  42. Skyrms, B.: 1980, ‘The prior propensity account of subjunctive conditionals’, in Harper, et al. (1980) pp. 259–268.Google Scholar
  43. Weyl, H.: 1952, Symmetry, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  44. Weiner, N.: 1949, Time Series, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brian Skyrms
    • 1
  1. 1.University of CaliforniaIrvineUSA

Personalised recommendations