Stress Doppler echocardiography

  • Steve M. Teague
  • James A. Heinsimer
Part of the Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine book series (DICM, volume 96)

Abstract

Perhaps the most serious intervention a cardiologist can recommend to patients under his care is cardiac surgery. Doppler ultrasound has proven merit in identifying patients with critical mitral and aortic stenosis, as well as severe aortic regurgitation who may warrant such intervention [1, 2, 3]. However, the most common complaint that patients bring to a clinical cardiologist is that of chest pain, mandating that the presence and severity of coronary artery disease be established. It is the purpose of this chapter to introduce the emerging role of Doppler ultrasound in the identification and classification of patients with coronary artery disease by stress testing. The merit of Doppler examination during stress testing lies in the ability to quanitate ventricular function by noninvasive measurement of velocity, acceleration, and volume of blood leaving the left ventricle during systolic ejection.

Keywords

Peak Velocity Ejection Velocity Suprasternal Notch Stroke Distance Supine Bicycle Exercise 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hatle L, Brubakk A, Tromsdal A, Angelsen B: Noninvasive assessment of pressure drop in mitral stenosis by Doppler ultrasound. Br Heart J 40:131, 1978.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stamm BR, Martin RP: Quantification of pressure gradients across stenotic valves by Doppler ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 2: 707, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Teague SM, Heinsimer JA, Andersonf JL, Sublett K, Olson EG, Voyles WF, Thadani U: Quantification of aortic regurgitation utilizing continuous wave Doppler ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 8 (3): 592, 1986.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rudewal B: Hemodynamic of the human ascending aorta as studied by of a differential pressure technique. Acta Physiol Scand 54 (Suppl. 187): 1, 1962.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rushmer RF, Watson N, Harding D, Baker D: Effects of acute coronary occlusion upon the performance of right and left ventricles in intact unanesthetized dogs. Am Heart J 66: 522, 1963.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kezdi P, Stanely EL, Marshall WJ Jr., Kordenat RK: Aortic flow velocity and acceleration as an index of ventricular performance during myocardial infarction. Am J Med Sci 257: 61, 1969.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hof RP, Hof A: Acceleration of blood in the aorta: A parameter useful for evaluating cardiotonic and afterload reducing substances. J Pharmacol Methods 6: 87, 1981.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Noble MIM, Trechard D, Guz A: Left ventricular ejection in conscious dogs: Measurement and significance of the maximum acceleration of blood from the left ventricle. Circ Res 19:139, 1966.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bennett ED, Else W, Miller GAH, Sutton GC, Miller HC, Noble MIM: Maximum acceleration of blood from the left ventricle in patients with ischemic heart disease. Clin Sci Mol Med 46:49, 1974.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kolettis M, Jenkins BS, Webb-peploe MM: Assessment of left ventricular function by indices derived from aortic flow velocity. Br Heart J: 38:18, 1976.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jewitt D, Gabe I, Mills C, Maurer B, Thomas M, Shillingford J: Aortic velocity and acceleration measurements in the assessment of coronary heart disease. Eur J Cardiol 1: 299, 1974.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mann T, Brodie B, Grossman W, McLaurin LP: Effects of angina on the left ventricular diastolic pressure-volume relationship. Circulation 55 (5): 761, 1977.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Metha N, Bennett DE: Impaired left ventricular function in acute myocardial infarction assessed by Doppler measurement of ascending aortic blood velocity and maximum acceleration. Am J Cardiol 57:1052, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Teague SM: Measurement of ventricular function using Doppler ultrasound. In: Kisslo JA ed. Basic Doppler Echocardiography. New York, Churchill Livingstone Publishers, pp. 65–70, 1985.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stein PD, et al.: Blood velocity and acceleration: Comparison of CW Doppler and electromagnetic flowmetry. Federation Proceedings 44 (5): 1565, 1985.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sabbah HS, Khaja F, Brymer JF, et al.: Noninvasive evaluation of left ventricular performance based on peak aortic blood acceleration measured with a continuous-wave Doppler velocity meter. Circulation 74 (2): 323, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Daley PJ, Sagar KB, Wann LS: Doppler echocardiography measurement of flow velocity in the ascending aorta during supine and upright exercise. Br Heart J 54:562, 1985.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gardin JM, Kozlowski J, Dabestani A, Murphy M, Kusnick C, Allfie A, Russell D, Henry WL: Studies of Doppler aortic flow velocity during supine bicycle exercise. Am J Cardiol 57:327, 1986.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bryg RJ, Labovitz AJ, Mehdirad AA, Williams GA, Chaitman BR: Effect of coronary artery disease on Doppler-derived parameters of aortic flow during upright exercise. Am J Cardiol 58:14, 1986.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Teague SM, Mark DB, Radford M, Robertson J, Albert D, Porter J, Waugh RA: Doppler velocity profiles reveal ischemic exercise responses. Circulation 70 (Supp. II): 185, 1984.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Teague SM, Mark DB, Radford M, Robertson J, Albert D, Waugh RA: Doppler ejection dynamics during ischemic exercise responses. Circulation 72 (Supp. III): 448, 1985.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Metha N, Bennett G, Mannering D, Dawkins K, Ward DE: Non-invasive Doppler measurement of ascending aortic blood velocity detects impairment of the left ventricular functional response to exercise in post-infarction patients. Am J Cardiol 58: 879, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steve M. Teague
  • James A. Heinsimer

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations