Thin Films of YBaCuO Prepared by Multilayer Evaporation Process
Abstract
Thin films of YBaCuO were prepared as a superlattice of three constituents from three electron guns using a computer-controlled evaporator. After annealing, the multilayer films are converted to the homogeneous superconducting phase. Highly epitaxial thin films with: (1) the a-axis perpendicular to (100) SrTiO3; (2) the c-axis perpendicular to (100) SrTiO3; and (3) the [110] axis perpendicular to (110) SrTiO3 were confirmed by x-ray diffraction as well as scanning electron microscopy and high resolution electron microscopy. Both the a-axis oriented and the c-axis oriented films exhibit zero resistance at 91K. The [110] oriented film shows the sharpest transition with a transition width of 1K and zero resistance at 85K. The zero field critical current density, Jc, determined magnetically, is in excess of 107A/cm2 at 4.4K and 1.04 x 106A/cm2 at 77K for the c-axis oriented film; for the a-axis oriented film we obtained 6.7 x 106A/cm2 at 4.4K and 1.2 x 105A/cm2 at 77K. The orientation dependence of the critical current density in the basal plane of the a-axis oriented film was studied. The largest Jc’s occur along the in-plane <100> axes of the substrate.
Keywords
Scanning Electron Microscopy Micrograph Critical Current Density Multilayer Film High Resolution Electron Microscopy Epitaxial Thin FilmPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.B. Oh, M. Naito, S. Arnason, P. Rosenthal, R. Barton, M.R. Beasley, T.H. Geballe, R.H. Hammond, and A. Kapitulnik, Appl. Phys. Lett. 51, 852 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.B.M. Clemens, C.W. Nieh, J.A. Kitt, W.L. Johnson, J.Y. Jo sefowicz, and A.T. Hunter, Appl. Phys. Lett. 53, 1871 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.D.M. Hwang, T. Venkatesan, C.C. Chang, L. Nazar, X.D. Wu, A. Inam, and M.S. Hegde, Appl. Phys. Lett. 54, 1702 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.
- 5.G. Linker, X.X. Xi, O. Meyer, Q. Li, and J. Greek, Solid State Communications 69, 249 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.T.R. Dinger, T.K. Worthington, W.J. Gallagher, and R.L. Sandstron, Phys. Rev. Lett, 58 2687 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.F.K. LeGoues, Philos, Mag. B57 167 (1988).Google Scholar
- 8.
- 9.S. Nakahara, G.J. Fisanick, M.F. Yan, R.B. van Dover, T. Boone, and R. Moore, J. Crystal Growth 85639 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.K. Salama, V. Selvamanickam, L. Gao, and K. Sun, Appl. Phys. Lett. 54 5 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.L.F. Scheneemeyer, J.V. Waszczak, T. Siegrist, R.B. van Dover, L.W. Rupp, B. Batlogg, R. J. Cava, and D.W. Murphy, Nature 328, 601 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.D.X. Li, X.K. Wang, D.Q. Li, R.P.H. Chang, and J.B. Ketterson, J. Appl. Phys., 66, 5505 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.P. Chaudhari, R.H. Koch, R.B. Laibowitz, T.R. McGuire, and R.J. Gambino, Phys. Rev. Lett. 582684 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.
- 15.
- 16.X.K. Wang, D.X. Li, S.N. Song, J.Q. Zheng, R.P.H. Chang, and J.B. Ketterson, MRS Fall Meeting Proceedings, Boston 1989.Google Scholar