Mechanical Properties and Fracture of Hybrid Particulate Composites

  • G. Levita
  • A. Marchetti
  • A. Lazzeri
  • S. De Petris

Abstract

A rigid epoxy resin was modified by acrylic core-shell particles and glass beads (with and without surface treatment). Glass transition temperature, elastic modulus and fracture toughness were determined for all formulations. The fracture toughness increased linearly with the rubber content (from 0.82 MPa√m for the neat resin to 2.6 MPa√m for 20% rubber). Toughness also increased on adding glass particles (for 50% glass up to 1.9 and 2.3 MPa√m depending on the surface treatment). The stress-strain behaviour in compression depended on glass content and surface sizing. The fracture behaviour markedly depended on the radius of curvature of the crack tip. The toughness of sharply cracked samples increased on increasing the glass content. On the contrary samples containing blunt cracks were embrittled by the hard particles. This was attributed to crack tip sharpening caused by detached beads.

Keywords

Fracture Toughness Hybrid Composite Rubber Content Glass Content Bead Composite 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1).
    S. Bandyopadhyay, V.M. Silva, Proc. 6th Int.Conf.Fracture, vol.4, Pergamon Press, Oxford 1984, page 2971.Google Scholar
  2. 2).
    A.J. Kinlock, D.L. Maxwell, R.J. Young, J.Mat.Sci., 20(1985) 4169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3).
    R.J. Young, D.L. Maxwell, A.J. Kinlock, ibid 21(1986)380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4).
    I.M. Low, Y.M. May., S. Bandyopadhyay, V.M. Silva, Mat.Forum, 10(1987) 241Google Scholar
  5. 5).
    A.C. Garg, Y.M. May, Comp.Sci.Techn. 31(1988) 193.Google Scholar
  6. 6).
    S. Bandyopadhyay, V.M. Silva, Y.M. May, Plast.Rub.Proc.Appl., 10(1988) 193.Google Scholar
  7. 7).
    G. Levita, A. Marchetti, E. Butta, Polymer, 26(1985) 1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8).
    A.J. Kinlock, S.J. Shaw, D.A. Tod, ibid, 24(1983) 1341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9).
    A.J. Kinlock, S.J. Shaw, D.L. Hunston, ibid, 24(1983) 1355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10).
    A.F. Yee, R.A. Pearson, J.Mat.Sci., 21(1986)2462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11).
    A.F. Yee, R.A. Pearson, ibid, 21(1986)2475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12).
    A.G. Evans, Phil.Mag., 26(1972)1327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Levita
    • 1
  • A. Marchetti
    • 1
  • A. Lazzeri
    • 1
  • S. De Petris
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept Chemical EngineeringUniversity of PisaPisaItaly

Personalised recommendations