Relation between axial length and refraction in eyes with congenital glaucoma

  • Alberto J. Betinjane
  • Celso A. Carvalho
Part of the Documenta Ophthalmologica Proceedings Series book series (DOPS, volume 53)

Summary

The purpose of the present communication was the evaluation of the frequency of refractive error in 107 patients with congenital glaucoma which had their intra-ocular pressure surgically controlled. Those findings were correlated to the respective biometric values of the axial length of the eye. The biometric study was obtained by ultrasonography. The biometric findings and its respective refractive error in the congenital glaucoma group were compared to the same parameters of a group of normal eyes in three different age groups up to the age of 15 years.

Keywords

Axial Length Refractive Error High Myopia Anterior Chamber Depth Axial Diameter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Betinjane A J. 1982. Contribuiçâo ao estudo da biometria ultrasonográfica no glaucoma\congènito. Tese Doc. Li-vre,—Fac. Med. USP. 1982.Google Scholar
  2. Ceschetti A. 1968. New results concerning the problem of axial lengths of the eye in anisometropie. Dans: Vanysex J., Diagnostica Ultrasonica in Ophtalmologia. Brno. pp. 235–238.Google Scholar
  3. Delmarcelle Y, Luyckx-Bacus J. 1971. Evolution biometrie de la chambre antérieure chez l’enfant etude de 1960 globes. Bull Soc Beige Ophthal 158: 451–465.Google Scholar
  4. Franceschetti ATh, Linder A, Fraceschetti A. 1968. New results concerning the problem of axial lengths of the eye in anisometropie. Dans: Vanysex J., Diag nóstica Ultrasonica in Ophthalmologia. Brno pp. 235–238.Google Scholar
  5. François J, Gois F. 1973. Biometrie de la myopic ophthalmologica, Basel, 147: 49–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gernetieh 1969. Datensammlung in der Klinischen Oculometrie. Doc Ophthal 27: 42–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jansson F. 1963. Measurements of intraocular distances by ultrassound. Acta Ophthal Kbh Suppl 74: 1–51.Google Scholar
  8. Kwitko M. 1973. Meredith Corporation, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Larsen JS. 1971. The saggital growth of the eye. Acta Ophthal Kbh 49: 239–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Luyckx-Bacus J, Weekers JF. 1966. Estude biometrique de l’oeil humain par ultrasonographic ire parte: les ametropies. Bull Soc Beige Ophthal 552–567.Google Scholar
  11. Machekhin VA. 1977 Ultrasehalbiometrie bei Augen mit Unterschiedlicher Refration Oftal., 24: 204–207.Google Scholar
  12. Rivara A, Cambiaggi A. 1964. Rapporto fra entità della refrazione lunghezza dell’asde oculare antero-posteriore e gravita delle alterazioni corloretinicho in soggetti miopi. Atti Dez XL Vili Congr Soc Oft Ital XXII: 2–4.Google Scholar
  13. Sampaolesi R. 1974. Glaucoma. Buenos Aires, E. Medica Panamericana pp. 653–665.Google Scholar
  14. Sorsby A, Benjamin B, Sheridan M. 1961. Refraction and its components during the growth of the eye. Secre. Rep. Serv. Med., Res. Coun., London, 301 HMSO.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alberto J. Betinjane
    • 1
  • Celso A. Carvalho
    • 1
  1. 1.Sao PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations