The French Water Industry in a Changing European Context

  • Dominique Drouet
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSE, volume 180)

Abstract

The French water management system is unique among industrialized countries because of the dominant role played by three large private groups which serve about 70% of the population between them. They have also diversified into a wide array of other urban services ranging from transportation to cable TV. They have integrated engineering, equipment manufacturing and construction and have grown abroad. For leading scholars, this development became possible for two main reasons: a highly flexible set of contractual agreements with the numerous local government units responsible for water in France; and a social and cultural context enabling water to be early considered as a commercial good. Changes occurring today in water management in Europe offer new opportunities to French water management firms. In the middle term, with the completion of the EC internal market, they will face much stronger competition, especially in the field of technology.

Keywords

Water Company Equipment Manufacturing Contractual Agreement Water Market Private Operator 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. (1).
    Drouet, D.L’industrie de L’eau dans le monde(The Water Industry in the World).Presse de l’ Ecole Nationale des Ponts et Chaussées, Paris 1988, and The Strategies of Firms in the Urban Water and Wastewater Sector - an international comparison’. Recherche Développement International. April 1987. Recherche Développement International, along with the Institut National du Génie Urbain de Lyon, organized an international workshop entitled “Urban Infrastructure Management: Who will hold the key roles tomorrow in Europe and in the World?” held in Lyon, April 26–28, 1989.Google Scholar
  2. (2).
    The average population per municipality is 1,500. From this perspective, France belongs to southern Europe. Whereas Scandinavian countries, the Federal Republic of Germany , and the United Kingdom have restructured Local Government units and redefined their responsibilities, neither France nor Spain nor Italy have succeeded in doing so. Meny, Y. La Réforme des Collectivités Locales en Europe, Stratégies et Résultats. Notes et Etudes Documentaires. La Documentation Française 1984.Google Scholar
  3. (3).
    Lorrain, D. CNRS, Paris, Fondation des Villes. La gestion des services de l’eau dans la France urbaine. Séminaire sur le génie urbain - 27–28 Avril 1988. Plan Urbain.Google Scholar
  4. (4).
    Lorrain, D. CNRS, Paris, Fondation des Villes. ‘Services urbains: l’expérience française’. Cahier Réseaux n° 10 - Mars 1988.Google Scholar
  5. (5).
    Faisandier, P. Directeur Général, Compagnie Générale des Eaux.L’organisation de la distribution de l’eau en Europe - Introduction à l’Atelier Financier’, Institut Européen del’ Eau. Bruxelles. 20 Mai 1985.Google Scholar
  6. (6).
    Finquelievich, S and Brunstein, R ‘Urban Infrastructure Management in Latin America. Current and Future Trends. ’ Khrouf, M. L. ‘Urban Infrastructure Management in Africa’. Nishimura, Y. ‘Urban Infrastructure Management - The Asian Context’. Papers presented at the international workshop, Urban Utilities and Infrastructure Management: Who will hold tomorrow’s key roles in Europe and Worldwide? Lyon, Institut du Génie Urbain. April, 26–28, 1989.Google Scholar
  7. (7).
    Cheret, I. Vice Président, Lyonnaise des Eaux. The French Experience’. Symposium proceedings. Privatization and the Water Industry. The Institute of Water Pollution Control. March 14, 1985.Google Scholar
  8. (8).
    Jacobson, C. ‘Water works’ electric utilities and cable television: contrasting historical patterns of ownership and regulation.Ph.D. Dissertation. Carnegie Mellon University. January 1988.Google Scholar
  9. (9).
    Barraque, B. ‘La gestion de l’eau en France et en Grande Bretagne: centralisation, décentralisation, privatisation.’ Colloque international. Crise et politiques locales. Paris. 18–20 Octobre 1984.Google Scholar
  10. (10).
    Lorrain, D. ‘L’eau en France.’ Dossier pédagogique. 1987.Google Scholar
  11. (11).
    Ribeill, G. ‘Réseaux techniques -Le développement à la française - Un modèle suggestif.’ Métropolis - 2nd trimester, 1986. n° 73/74. Additional considerations on the historical development of the French water management system can be found in the following publications: Guillerme, A. ’Capter, clarifier, transporter l’eau. France. 18001850’. Les Annales de la Recherche Urbaine n° 23–24. Goubert, J P. ’La France s’équipe. Les réseaux d’eau et d’assainissement 1850–1950’. Les Annales de la Recherche Urbaine n° 23–24. Lorrain, D. ’Du fontainier à l’automate.’ Les Annales de la Recherche Urbaine n° 30.Google Scholar
  12. (12).
    Fortin, D. ‘Les émirs de l’eau.’ Le Nouvel Economiste n° 632. 26 Février 1988.Google Scholar
  13. (13).
    Charron, J M. CNRS. CNET. ‘Les exploitants du câble.’ Réseaux n° 26. Novembre 1987.Google Scholar
  14. (14).
    For data on the historical development of CGE, SLE, SAUR and other urban service companies in France see Lorrain, D. ’ Le secteur public local entre nationalisation et décentralisation.’ Les Annales de la Recherche Urbaine n°13. Janvier 1982. Basic figures about their activities can be found in Barraque B, Lorrain, D, Drouet, D, Faucheux, S. ’ La filière eau-assainissement en France et dans le monde’. Centre d’ Etude des Systèmes et des Technologies Avancées. 1984.Google Scholar
  15. (15).
    Drouet, D. ‘Génie urbain et diversification des exploitants de réseaux (Electricité, eau, vidéocommunication) dans les pays industrialisés - Observations et interrogations’. Groupe Réseaux. Cahier n° 8. Ecole des Ponts et Chaussées. Mai 1987.Google Scholar
  16. (16).
    In the UK, the Biwater Group recently achieved vertical integration from pipe manufacturing to water systems operation after purchasing Ames Crosta a water and sewage plant contractor and the West Hampshire Water Company which serves a population of 167,000.Google Scholar
  17. (17).
    Drouet, D. ‘Innovative strategies in the environmental industry. An international comparison.’ In proceedings of the Second European Conference on Environmental Technology. Amsterdam, The Netherlands. June 22–26 1987. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
  18. (18).
    Numbers available in the area of basic infrastructure - water and sewage hook-ups, wastewater treatment facilities - show a net deficit only in the later category. The 1984 assessment of the European Water Pollution Control Association indicates that in Europe, an average of 93% of the households have running ring water, 84% are hooked-up to sewage but only 55% of these are tied into sewage treatment plants. “Eurowater” - The European Water Pollution Control Association, 1984.Google Scholar
  19. (19).
    Drouet, D. ‘Urban Infrastructure Management Trends in Europe.’ Paper presented at the 1988 International Public Works Congress, Toronto. September 24–29 1988.Google Scholar
  20. (20).
    Engineering News Record. August 6, 1987.Google Scholar
  21. (21).
    Drouet, D. ‘Note on Technology Transfer Issues in the European Environmental Industry.’ European Community Commission. DG X. March 4, 1988.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dominique Drouet
    • 1
  1. 1.Recherche Développement InternationalParisFrance

Personalised recommendations