Manprint pp 1-16 | Cite as

Introduction: The Manprint Philosophy

  • Harold R. Booher

Abstract

On March 28,1979, the central control room operators were alerted to a loss of feedwater to the pressurized water reactor (PWR) of the Three Mile Island Unit 2. The safety injection pumps came on automatically to pump in auxiliary water to the reactor vessel. The indicators for the pressurized vessel, however, showed a dangerous “water-solid” condition for the pressurized vessel. In an attempt to reduce the pressurizer water level, the operators turned off the safety injection pump. Consequently, the reactor core water cover became depleted, leading to a near meltdown. As a result, the nuclear industry radically changed its management and organizational approaches to nuclear safety, but has never fully recovered from the effects of the accident or alleviated the public concerns with nuclear energy.

Keywords

Human Factor User Requirement Pressurize Water Reactor Nuclear Regulatory Commission System Integration Approach 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Air Force Systems Command, Headquarters (1967). Handbook of instructions for aerospace personnel subsystems design (AFSCM 80–3). Washington, DC: Andrews Air Force Base.Google Scholar
  2. Bogner, M. S., Kibbe, M., & Laine, R. (1990). Directory of design support methods. Developed for Department of Defense Human Factors Engineering Technical Group (Designing for the User Subgroup). Washington, DC: Headquarters, Department of the Army, Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff for Personnel, MANPRINT Directorate.Google Scholar
  3. Fucigna, J. (1968). Human performance development program for Naval Material Command. Darien, CT: Dunlap and Associates.Google Scholar
  4. Hopkins, C. O., et al. (1982). Critical human factors issues in nuclear power regulation and recommended comprehensive long range plans (3 vols.; Technical Report NUREG CR-2833). Washington, DC: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.Google Scholar
  5. Little, A. D. (1966). The state of the art of traffic safety: A critical review and analysis of the technical information in factors affecting traffic safety. Washington, DC: Automobile Manufacturers Association.Google Scholar
  6. Moray, N., & Huey, B. (1988). Human factors research and nuclear safety. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  7. Yamada, S. (1989, June 1). Paradigm shift in product/service development. Japanese business strategies at a turning point. New York: NRI Forum International.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Van Nostrand Reinhold 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harold R. Booher

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations