Invertebrates and Area Size in the Porphyry Landscape of Halle

  • R. Biedermann
  • M. Appelt
Part of the The GeoJournal Library book series (GEJL, volume 35)

Abstract

In fragmented landscapes, like the porphyry landscape north of Halle (Germany), species are often faced with a set of suitable habitats of various size and isolation. An important issue in conservation biology is the design of nature refuges, which ensure the viability of populations. In community ecology, it is widely agreed, that the number of species increases with increasing patch size (e.g. Simberloff 1988). The predictive power of such species-area curves, however, is weak (Doak & Mills 1994).

Keywords

Suitable Habitat Area Size Fragmented Landscape Minimum Viable Population Nature Refuge 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adler, G.H & M.L. Wilson (1985). Small mammals on Massachusetts islands: The use of probability functions in clarifying biogeographic relationships. Oecologia 66, 178–186.Google Scholar
  2. Doak, D.F. & L.S. Mill (1994). A usefull role for theory in conservation. Ecology 75, 615–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hanski, I. (1994a). Patch-occupancy dynamics in fragmented landscapes. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9, 131–135.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hanski, I. (1994b). A practical model of metapopulation dynamics. Journal of Animal Ecology 63, 151–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Henle, K., J. Settele & G. Kaule (1995). Aufgaben, Ziele und erste Ergebnisse des “Forschungsverbunds Isolation, Flächengröße, Biotopqualität (FIFB)”. Verhandlungen der Gesellschaft für Ökologie 24, 181–186.Google Scholar
  6. Hinsley, S.A., P.E. Bellamy, I. Newton &T.H. Sparks (1996). Influences of population size and woodland area on bird species distributions in small woods. Oecologia 105, 100–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jetschke, G. & H. Fröbe (1994). Ausbreitung und Überleben von kleinen Populationen in fragmentierten Habitaten. Zeitschrift für Ökologie und Naturschutz 3,179–187.Google Scholar
  8. Simberloff, D. (1988). The contribution of population and community biology to conservation science. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 19, 473–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Taylor, B. (1991). Investigating species incidence over habitat fragments - a look at error estimation. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 42, 715–722.Google Scholar
  10. Watkinson, A.R. & W.J. Sutherland (1995). Sources, sinks and pseudo-sinks. Journal of Animal Ecology 64, 126–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Biedermann
    • 1
  • M. Appelt
    • 1
  1. 1.Zoological Institute, Martin-Luther-University Halle-WittenbergHalleGermany

Personalised recommendations