Long-Term Behavior of the Motion of Pluto Over 5.5 Billion Years

  • Hiroshi Kinoshita
  • Hiroshi Nakai

Abstract

The motion of Pluto is said to be chaotic in the sense that the maximum Lyapunov exponent is positive: the Lyapunov time (the inverse of the Lyapunov exponent) is about 20 million years. So far the longest integration up to now, over 845 million years (42 Lyapunov times), does not show any indication of a gross instability in the motion of Pluto. We carried out the numerical integration of Pluto over the age of the solar system (5.5 billion years ″ 280 Lyapunov times). This integration also did not give any indication of chaotic evolution of Pluto. The divergences of Keplerian elements of a nearby trajectory at first grow linearly with the time and then start to increase exponentially. The exponential divergences stop at about 420 million years. The divergences in the semi-major axis and the mean anomaly (equivalently the longitude and the distance) saturate. The divergences of the other four elements, the eccentricity, the inclination, the argument of perihelion, and the longitude of node still grow slowly after the stop of the exponential increase and finally saturate.

Keywords

Solar System Lyapunov Exponent Large Lyapunov Exponent Maximum Lyapunov Exponent Outer Planet 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Gragg, W.B.: 1965, On extrapolation algorithms for ordinary initial value problems, SIAM J. Num. Anal. 2, pp.384–403.ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. Kozai, Y.: 1962, Secular perturbation of asteroids with high inclination and eccentricity, Astron. J. 67, pp.591–598.CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. Laskar, J.: 1989, A numerical experiment on the chaotic behavior of the solar system, Nature 338, pp.237–238.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. Milani, A., Nobili, A.M. and Carpino, M.: 1989, Dynamics of Pluto, Icarus 82, pp.200– 217.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. Nakai, H., Kinoshita, H. and Yoshida, H.: 1992, Dependence on computer’s arithmetic precision in calculation of Lyapunov characteristic exponent, in Proceedings of the 25 Symposium on Celestial Mechanics, eds. Kinoshita, H. and Nakai, H., pp. 1-10.Google Scholar
  6. Nakai, H., Kinoshita, H.: 1994, Stability of the orbits of Pluto, in Proceedings of the 26 Symposium on Celestial Mechanics, eds. Kinoshita, H. and Nakai, H., pp133-138.Google Scholar
  7. Nobili, A.M., Milani, A. and Carpino, M.: 1989, Fundamental frequencies and small divisors in the orbits of the outer planets, Astron. Astrophys 210, pp.313–336.ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. Quinlan, D. and Tremaine, S.: 1990, Symmetric multistep methods for the numerical integration of planetary orbits, Astron. J. 100, pp.1694–1700.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. Sussman, G.J. and Wisdom, J.: 1988, Numerical evidence that the motion of Pluto is chaotic, Science 241, pp.433–437.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. Sussman, G.J. and Wisdom, J.: 1992, Chaotic evolution of the solar system, Science 257, pp.56–62.CrossRefMATHADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. Williams, J.G. and Benson, G.S.: 1971, Resonances in the Neptune-Pluto system, Astron. J. 76, pp.167–177.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. Wisdom, J.: 1992, Long term evolution of the solar system, in Chaos, Resonance and Collective Dynamical Phenomena in the Solar System, ed. S. Ferraz-Mello, Kluwer, pp.17-24.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hiroshi Kinoshita
    • 1
  • Hiroshi Nakai
    • 1
  1. 1.National Astronomical ObservatoryMitaka, TokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations