Social Issues in Sustainable Fisheries Management pp 257-277

Part of the MARE Publication Series book series (MARE, volume 9) | Cite as

Sense of Place and Socio-cultural Values in Fishing Communities Along the English Channel

Chapter

Abstract

There is increasing interest in the social and cultural impacts of marine fisheries in coastal communities. This chapter uses the idea of ‘sense of place’ to explore the material and perceptual relations that emerge as a result of marine fishing in a range of villages and towns in France and England along the English Channel. Currently sense of place is an underused concept in resource management in general and within fisheries management in particular. We show how sense of place can be used to make visible a range of social and cultural values that emerge from the process of marine fishing. These values can then be expressed within a cultural ecosystem services framework, potentially helping to make the results accessible to a broader range of stakeholders, including policy makers and those involved in developing sustainable communities. The chapter concludes with some thoughts about the usefulness of approaches like actor network theory in providing relational perspectives for understanding marine fisheries management.

Keywords

Sense of place Cultural ecosystem services Social and cultural value of fisheries English Channel CHARM III Sustainable communities Co-construction Place identity Cultural heritage 

References

  1. Acott, T., & Urquhart, J. (2012). Marine Fisheries and Sense of Place in Coastal Communities of the English Channel/La Manche. Final report of Action 6.2 of the CHARM III Interreg 4a project. Chatham: University of Greenwich.Google Scholar
  2. Agyeman, J., & Evans, B. (2004). ‘Just sustainability’: The emerging discourse of environmental justice in Britain? The Geographical Journal, 170(2), 155–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Altman, I. A., & Low, S. M. (Eds.). (1992). Place attachment. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Babbie, E. (2010). The basics of social research. Belmont: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  5. Blay-Palmer, A. (2011). Sustainable communities, an introduction. Local Environment, 16(8), 747–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. BMT. (2009). Reducing Risk in the English Channel/La Manche Traffic Separation Schemes. final report for the Maritime and Coastguard Agency (MCA) and the Ministere de l’Ecologie, de l’Energie, du Developpement durable et de l’Amenagement du territoire, BMT Isis Ltd.Google Scholar
  7. Bradshaw, M., Wood, L. & Williamson, S. (2001). Applying qualitative and quantitative research: A social impact assessment of a fishery. Applied Geography, 21, 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Britto, C. M. (2011). Sustainable community development: A brief introduction to the multi-modal systems method. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 24(6): 533–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brookfield, K., Gray, T., & Hatchard, J. (2005). The concept of fisheries-dependent communities. A comparative analysis of four UK case studies: Shetland, Peterhead, North Shields and Lowestoft. Fisheries Research, 72, 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chan, K. M. A., Satterfield, T., & Goldstein, J. (2012). Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecological Economics, 74, 8–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Church, A., Burgess, J., Ravenscroft, N., Bird, W., Blackstock, K., Brady, E., Crang, M., Fish, R., Gruffudd, P., Mourato, S., Pretty, J., Tolia-Kelly, D., Turner, K., & Winter, M. (2011). Cultural services. UK National Ecosystem Assessment: Technical Report. Cambridge, UNEP–WCMC.Google Scholar
  12. Creswell, T. (2004). Place: A short introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  13. Crist, E. (2004). Against the social construction of nature and wilderness. Environmental Ethics, 26, 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dalby, S., & Mackenzie, F. (1997). Reconceptualising local community: Environment, identity and threat. Area, 29(2), 99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. EC. (2009). Green paper: Reform of the common fisheries policy. Brussels, European Commission.Google Scholar
  16. Eftec. (2010). Provision of sustainable access to Inshore Fisheries Research Gap Analysis. London, Defra.Google Scholar
  17. Eisenhauer, B. W., Krannich, R. S., & Blahna, D. J. (2000). Attachments to special places on public lands: An analysis of activities, reason for attachments, and community connections. Society and Natural Resources, 13, 421–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Firn Crichton Roberts Ltd & Graduate School of Environmental Studies, University of Strathclyde (2000). An assessment of the socio-economic costs & benefits of integrated coastal zone management. Final report to the European Commission.Google Scholar
  19. Fletcher, S., Saunders, J., & Herbert, R.J.H. (2011). A review of the ecosystem services provided by broad-scale marine habitats in England’s MPA network. Journal of Coastal Research, 64(1): 378–383.Google Scholar
  20. Forst, M. F. (2009). The convergence of Integrated Coastal Zone Management and the ecosystems approach. Ocean & Coastal Management, 52(6), 294–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Garcia, S. M., Zerbi, A., Aliaume, C., Do Chi, T., & Lasserre, G. (2003). The ecosystem approach to fisheries. Issues, terminology, principles, institutional foundations, implementation and outlook. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper. Rome, FAO: 71.Google Scholar
  22. Harvey, D. C. (1996). Justice, nature and the geography of difference. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  23. Holloway, L., & Hubbard, P. (2001). People and place: The extraordinary geographies of everyday life. Harlow: Pearson Education Ltd.Google Scholar
  24. Hummon, D. M. (1992). Community attachment: Local sentiment and sense of place. In I. Altman & S. M. Low (Eds.), Place attachment. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  25. ICSF. (2010). ITQs a User Right, not a Property Right, confirms EU Commissioner for Fisheries and Maritime Affairs. I. C. i. S. o. Fishworkers.Google Scholar
  26. Jacob, S., Farmer, F., Jepson, M., & Adams, C. (2001). Landing a definition of fishing dependent communities. Fisheries, 26(10), 16–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jacquet, J. (2009). Silent water: A brief examination of the marine fisheries crises. Environment Development and Sustainability, 11, 255–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jentoft, S. (2000). The community: A missing link of fisheries management. Marine Policy, 24, 53–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kaltenborn, B. P. (1998). Effects of sense of place on responses to environmental impacts. Applied Geography, 18(2), 169–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: an introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Low, S. M., & Altman, I. I. (1992). Place attachment: A conceptual inquiry. In I. Altman & S. M. Low (Eds.), Place attachment. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  32. Lundy, L., & Wade R. (2011). Integrating sciences to sustain urban ecosystem services. Progress in Physical Geography, 35(5), 653–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mace, G. M., & Bateman, I. (2011). Conceptual framework and methodology. The UK National Ecosystem Assessment: Technical Report. Cambridge, UNEP–WCMC.Google Scholar
  34. Mace, G. M., Norris, K., & Fitter, A. H. (2012). Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multilayered relationship. Trends Ecol Evol, 27(1), 19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Malpas, J. (2008). New media, cultural heritage and the sense of place: Mapping the conceptual ground. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 14(3), 197–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Marsden, T. & Hines, F. (2008). Unpacking the quest for community: some conceptual parameters. In T. Marsden (Ed.), Sustainable Communities: new spaces for planning, participation and engagement. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  37. Massey, D., & Jess, P. (Eds.). (1995). A place in the world? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. McClanahan, T. R., Castilla, J. C., White, A. T., & Defeo, O. (2009). Healing small-scale fisheries by facilitating complex socio-ecological systems. Rev Fish Biol Fisheries, 19, 33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. MEA. (2005a). Ecosystems and human well-Being, Synthesis Report. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.Google Scholar
  40. MEA. (2005b). Millennium ecosystem assessment: Current state and trends assessment. Washington D.C.: Island Press, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment.Google Scholar
  41. Murdoch, J. (2001). Ecologising sociology: Actor-network theory, co-construction and the problem of human exemptionalism. Sociology, 35(1), 111–133.Google Scholar
  42. Nadel-Klein, J. (2000). Granny baited the lines: perpetual crisis and the changing role of women in Scottish fishing communities. Women’s Studies International Forum, 23(3), 363–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nadel-Klein, J., & Davis, D. L. (1988). To work and to weep. St John’s, Newfoundland, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Memorial University of Newfoundland.Google Scholar
  44. NEA. (2011). UK National Ecosystem Assessment: Understanding Nature’s Value to Society. Synthesis of the Key Findings. Cambridge, UNEP–WCMC.Google Scholar
  45. Nuttall, M. (2000). Crisis, risk and deskillment in North-east Scotland’s fishing industry. In D. Symes (Ed.), Fisheries dependent regions. Oxford: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
  46. Perry, I. R., & Rosemary, O. E. (2010). Introduction: Coping with global change in marine social-ecological systems. Marine Policy, 34(4), 739–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pollnac, R. B., Abbott-Jamieson, S., Smith, C., Miller, M. L., Clay, P. M., & Oles, B. (2006). Toward a model for fisheries social impact assessment. Marine Fisheries Review, 68(1–4), 1–18.Google Scholar
  48. Proshansky, H.M., Fabian, A.K., & Kaminoff, R. (1983). Place-identity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3, 57–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Relph, E. (1976). Place and placelessness. London: Pion.Google Scholar
  50. Robertson, M. (2012). Measurement and alienation: making a world of ecosystem services. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 37, 386–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Roseland, M. (2000). Sustainable community development: integrating environmental, economic, and social objectives. Progress in Planning, 54, 73–132.Google Scholar
  52. Schofield, J., & Szymanski, R. (2011). Sense of place in a changing world. In J. Schofield & R. Szymanski (Eds.), Local heritiage, global context: Cultural perspectives on sense of place. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  53. Shumaker, S. A., & Taylor, R. B. (1983). Toward a clarification of people-place relationships: A model of attachment to place. In N. R. Feimer & E. S. Geller (Eds.), Environmental psychology: Directions and perspectives (pp. 219–251). New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  54. Stedman, R. C. (2003). Is it really just a social construction?: The contribution of the physical environment to sense of place. Society and Natural Resources, 16(8): 671–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Steelman, T. A., & Wallace, R. L. (2001). Propety rights and property wrongs: Why context matters in fisheries management. Policy Sciences, 34, 357–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Symes, D. (2005). Altering course: Future directions for Europe’s fisheries policy. Fisheries Research, 71(3): 259–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Symes, D., & Frangoudes, K. (2001). The social organisation and reproduction of inshore fishing. In D. Symes & J. Phillipson (Eds.), Inshore fisheries management. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Symes, D., & Phillipson, J. (2009). Whatever became of social objectives in fisheries policy? Fisheries Research, 95(1), 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Thrift, N. (2007). Non-representational theory: Space, politics, affect. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  60. Tuan, Y.-F. (1974). Topophilia: A study of environmental perceptions, attitudes and values. Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  61. Tuan, Y.-F. (1977). Space and place: The perspectives of experiance. Minneapolis University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  62. Tweed, C., & Sutherland, M. (2007). Built cultural heritage and sustainable urban development. Landscape and Urban Planning, 83(1), 62–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Urquhart, J., & Acott, T. (2013). Constructing ‘The Stade’: Fishers’ and non-fishers’ identity and place attachment in Hastings, south-east England. Marine Policy, 37, 45–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Urquhart, J., & Acott, T. (2014). A sense of place in cultural ecosystem services: The case of Cornish fishing communities. Society and Natural Resources. 27(1), 3–19.Google Scholar
  65. Urquhart, J., Acott, T., Reed, M., & Courtney, P. (2011). Setting an agenda for social science research in fisheries policy in Northern Europe. Fisheries Research, 108, 240–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. van Ginkel, R. (2001). Inshore fishermen: Cultural dimensions of a maritime occupation. In D. Symes & J. Phillipson (Eds.), Inshore Fisheries Management. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  67. Vileniske, I. G. (2008). Influence of built heritage on sustainable development of landscape. Landscape Research, 33(4), 425–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Whatmore, S. (2002). Hybrid geographies: Natures, cultures and spaces. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  69. Williams, R. (2008). Changing constructions of identity: Fisher households and industry restructuring. PhD, Newcastle University.Google Scholar
  70. Williams, C. C., & Millington, A. C. (2004). The diverse and contested meanings of sustainable development. The Geographical Journal, 170(2), 99–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Williams, D. R., & Stewart, S. I. (1998). Sense of place: An elusive concept that is finding a home in ecosystem management. Journal of Forestry, 96, 18–23.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ScienceUniversity of Greenwich, Central Avenue, Chatham MaritimeChathamUK

Personalised recommendations