Diagnostic System for Malingered PTSD Disability/Dysfunction and Related Negative Response Biases: User Version and Worksheet

  • Gerald Young
Chapter
Part of the International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine book series (LIME, volume 56)

Abstract

This chapter and the next two present the three malingering diagnostic systems that have been created in the present book (see  Chap. 5). As a whole, the system is referred to as the Psychological Injury Disability/Dysfunction – Feigning/Malingering/Response Bias System: (PID-FMR-S).

Keywords

Primary Care Physician Response Bias Mental Health Professional Present System Psychological Injury 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. 2013. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-V, 5th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  2. Ben-Porath, Y.S., and A. Tellegen. 2008/2011. MMPI-2-RF: Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bianchini, K.J., K.W. Greve, and G. Glynn. 2005. On the diagnosis of malingered pain-related disability: Lessons from cognitive malingering research. The Spine Journal 5: 404–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boone, K.B. 2011. Clarification or confusion? A review of Rogers, Bender, and Johnson’s a critical analysis of the MND criteria for feigned cognitive impairment: Implications for forensic practice and research. Psychological Injury and Law 4: 157–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Briere, J. 2001. Detailed Assessment of Posttraumatic Stress professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  6. Briere, J. 2011. Trauma Symptom Inventory (TSI-2) professional manual, 2nd ed. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  7. Bruns, D., and J.M. Disorbio. 2003. Battery for Health Improvement 2 manual. Minneapolis: Pearson Assessment Systems.Google Scholar
  8. Butcher, J.N., W.G. Dahlstrom, J.R. Graham, A. Tellegen, and B. Kaemmer. 1989. Manual for the Restandardized Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory: MMPI-2. An interpretive guide. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  9. Butcher, J.N., J.R. Graham, Y.S. Ben-Porath, A. Tellegen, W.G. Dahlstrom, and G. Kaemmer. 2001. Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2: Manual for administration and scoring, 2nd ed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  10. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S. Ct. 2786 (1993).Google Scholar
  11. Disorbio, J.M., and D. Bruns. 2002. Brief Battery for Health Improvement 2 manual. Minneapolis: Pearson Assessment Systems.Google Scholar
  12. Frederick, R.I. 1997. Validity Indicator Profile manual. Minnetonka: NCS Assessments.Google Scholar
  13. Gervais, R.O., Y.S. Ben-Porath, D.B. Wygant, and P. Green. 2007. Development and validation of a Response Bias Scale (RBS) for the MMPI-2. Assessment 14: 196–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Green, P. 2005. Green’s Word Memory Test for Window’s: User’s manual. Edmonton: Green’s.Google Scholar
  15. Hathaway, S.R., and J.C. McKinley. 1943. Manual for the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  16. Henry, G.K., R.L. Heilbronner, W. Mittenberg, and C. Enders. 2006. The Henry-Heilbronner Index: A 15-item empirically derived MMPI-2 subscale for identifying probable malingering in personal injury litigants and disability claimants. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 20: 786–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Larrabee, G.J. 2012a. Assessment of malingering. In Forensic neuropsychology: A scientific approach, 2nd ed, ed. G.J. Larrabee, 116–159. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Larrabee, G.J. 2012b. Forensic neuropsychology: A scientific approach. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Larrabee, G.J., S.R. Millis, and J.E. Meyers. 2009. 40 plus or minus 10, a new magical number: Reply to Russell. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 23: 841–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lees-Haley, P.R., L.T. English, and W.J. Glenn. 1991. A Fake Bad Scale for the MMPI-2 for personal injury claimants. Psychological Reports 68: 203–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Miller, H.A. 2001. M-FAST: Miller-Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  22. Morel, K.R. 1995. Use of the binomial theorem in detecting fictitious posttraumatic stress disorder. Anxiety Disorders Practice Journal 2: 55–62.Google Scholar
  23. Morel, K.R. 1998. Development and preliminary validation of a forced-choice test of response bias for posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Personality Assessment 70: 299–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Morey, L. 1991. Personality Assessment Inventory: Professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  25. Morey, L. 2007. Personality Assessment Inventory: Professional manual, 2nd ed. Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  26. Reynolds, C.R., and A.M. Horton Jr. 2012. Detection of malingering during head injury litigation. New York: Springer Science + Business Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Reynolds, C.R., and R.W. Kamphaus. 2004. BASC-2: Behavior Assessment System for Children, 2nd ed. Circle Pines: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
  28. Rogers, R., R.M. Bagby, and S.E. Dickens. 1992. Structured interview of reported symptoms. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  29. Rogers, R., K.W. Sewell, and N.D. Gillard. 2010. Structured interview of reported symptoms, second edition: Professional manual. Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  30. Rogers, R., S.D. Bender, and S.F. Johnson. 2011a. A critical analysis of the MND criteria for feigned cognitive impairment: Implications for forensic practice and research. Psychological Injury and Law 4: 147–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rogers, R., S.D. Bender, and S.F. Johnson. 2011b. A commentary on the MND model and the Boone critique: “Saying it doesn’t make it so”. Psychological Injury and Law 4: 162–167.Google Scholar
  32. Rondinelli, R.D., E. Genovese, R.T. Katz, T.G. Mayer, K.L. Mueller, M.I. Ranavaya, and C.R. Brigham (eds.). 2008. Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment, 6th ed. Chicago: American Medical Association.Google Scholar
  33. Rubenzer, S. 2009. Posttraumatic stress disorder: Assessing response style and malingering. Psychological Injury and Law 2: 114–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ruff, R.M., and K.M. Hibbard. 2003. RNBI Ruff Neurobehavioral Inventory professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  35. Slick, D.J., G. Hopp, E. Strauss, and G.B. Thomson. 1997. Victoria Symptom Validity Test: Professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  36. Slick, D.J., E.M.S. Sherman, and G.L. Iverson. 1999. Diagnostic criteria for malingered neurocognitive dysfunction: Proposed standards for clinical practice and research. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 13: 545–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tombaugh, T.N. 1996. TOMM: The Test of Memory Malingering manual. North Tonawanda: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
  38. Worthen, M.D., and R.G. Moering. 2011. A practical guide to conducting VA compensation and pension exams for PTSD and other mental disorders. Psychological Injury and Law 4: 187–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerald Young
    • 1
  1. 1.Glendon CollegeYork UniversityTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations