Introduction: Psychological Injury, Malingering, Ethics, and Law

  • Gerald Young
Chapter
Part of the International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine book series (LIME, volume 56)

Abstract

To begin, this introductory chapter provides the reader with a detailed summary of the book. Next, it describes in depth the area of psychiatric/psychological injury and law. This book is about the major areas of psychiatric/psychological injury and law, and especially about scientific, impartial, and comprehensive approaches to malingering and its detection.

Keywords

Traumatic Brain Injury Mental Health Professional Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Conversion Disorder Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. 2000. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: Text revision, 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association. 2013. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-V (5th Ed.). Washington: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  3. American Psychological Association. 2002. Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist 57: 1060–1073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andrikopoulos, J., and M.F. Greiffenstein. 2012. Something to talk about? The status of post-traumatic stress disorder in clinical neuropsychology. In Forensic neuropsychology: A scientific approach, 2nd ed, ed. G.J. Larrabee, 365–400. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Baker, N.L., M.J.T. Vasquez, and S.L. Shullman. 2013. Assessing employment discrimination and harassment. In Handbook of psychology: Vol. 11. Forensic psychology, 2nd ed, ed. R.K. Otto and I.B. Weiner, 225–245. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Ben-Porath, Y.S., and A. Tellegen. 2008/2011. MMPI-2-RF: Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  7. Berry, D.T.R., and N.W. Nelson (eds.). 2011. Special issue: Malingering: Special topic (Part 1). Psychological Injury and Law, 4.Google Scholar
  8. Bianchini, K.J., K.W. Greve, and G. Glynn. 2005. On the diagnosis of malingered pain-related disability: Lessons from cognitive malingering research. The Spine Journal 5: 404–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bianchini, K.J., K.L. Curtis, and K.W. Greve. 2013. Cognitive performance validity assessment in mild traumatic brain injury, physical pain, and posttraumatic stress. In Mild traumatic brain injury: System validity assessment and malingering, ed. D.A. Carone and S.S. Bush, 323–346. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  10. Boone, K.B. (ed.). 2007. Assessment of feigned cognitive impairment: A neuropsychological perspective. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  11. Boone, K.B. 2011. Clarification or confusion? A review of Rogers, Bender, and Johnson’s a critical analysis of the MND criteria for feigned cognitive impairment: Implications for forensic practice and research. Psychological Injury and Law 4: 157–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Briere, J. 2001. Detailed assessment of posttraumatic stress professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  13. Butcher, J.N., W.G. Dahlstrom, J.R. Graham, A. Tellegen, and B. Kaemmer. 1989. Manual for the restandardized Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory: MMPI-2. An interpretive guide. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  14. Butcher, J.N., J.R. Graham, Y.S. Ben-Porath, A. Tellegen, W.G. Dahlstrom, and G. Kaemmer. 2001. Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2: Manual for administration and scoring, 2nd ed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  15. Carone, D.A., and S.S. Bush. 2013. Mild traumatic brain injury: System validity assessment and malingering. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Committee on the Revision of the Specialty Guidelines for Forensic Psychology, R. Otto, Chair. 2011, March 18. Specialty guidelines for forensic psychology (6th Draft). Retrieved from http://www.ap-ls.org/aboutpsychlaw/3182011sgfpdraft.pdf
  17. Corey, D.M., and R. Borum. 2013. Forensic assessment for high-risk occupations. In Handbook of psychology: Vol. 11. Forensic psychology, 2nd ed, ed. R.K. Otto and I.B. Weiner, 246–270. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  18. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 113 S. Ct. 2786 (1993).Google Scholar
  19. DeMier, R.L. 2013. Forensic report writing. In Handbook of psychology: Vol. 11. Forensic psychology, 2nd ed, ed. R.K. Otto and I.B. Weiner, 75–98. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  20. Drob, S.L., K.B. Meehan, and S.E. Waxman. 2009. Clinical and conceptual problems in the attribution of malingering in forensic evaluations. Journal of American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 37: 98–106.Google Scholar
  21. Drogin, E.Y., F.M. Dattilio, R.L. Sadoff, and T.G. Gutheil. 2011. Handbook of forensic assessment. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Duckworth, M.P., T. Iezzi, and W.T. O’Donohue (eds.). 2008. Motor vehicle collisions: Medical, psychosocial, and legal consequences. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  23. Erard, R.E. 2012. Special issue: Assessment special section. Psychological Injury and Law, 5.Google Scholar
  24. Erickson, S.K., and C.P. Ewing. 2013. Legal contours of expert testimony. In Handbook of psychology: Vol. 11. Forensic psychology, 2nd ed, ed. R.K. Otto and I.B. Weiner, 62–74. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  25. Foote, W.E. 2013. Forensic evaluation in Americans with Disabilities Act cases. In Handbook of psychology: Vol. 11. Forensic psychology, 2nd ed, ed. R.K. Otto and I.B. Weiner, 271–294. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  26. Foote, W.E., and C.R. Lareau. 2013. Psychological evaluation of emotional damages in tort cases. In Handbook of psychology: Vol. 11. Forensic psychology, 2nd ed, ed. R.K. Otto and I.B. Weiner, 172–200. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  27. Frueh, B.C., and S. Wessely (eds.). 2010. Special issue: Posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychological Injury and Law, 3.Google Scholar
  28. Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013, 34 ALR 145 (D. C. Cir 1923).Google Scholar
  29. Gatchel, R.J., Y.B. Peng, P.N. Fuchs, M.L. Peters, and D.C. Turk. 2007. The biopsychosocial approach to chronic pain: Scientific advances and future directions. Psychological Bulletin 133: 581–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. General Electric Company et al. vs. Joiner et ux., 522 U. S. 136 (1997).Google Scholar
  31. Green, P. 2005. Green’s Word Memory Test for Window’s: User’s manual. Edmonton: Green’s.Google Scholar
  32. Hathaway, S.R., and J.C. McKinley. 1943. Manual for the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  33. Heilbrun, K., T. Grisso, and A.M. Goldstein. 2009. Foundations of forensic mental health assessment. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Howe, L.L.S. 2012. Distinguishing genuine from malingered posttraumatic stress disorder in head injury litigation. In Detecting of malingering during head injury litigation, 2nd ed, ed. C.R. Reynolds and A.M. Horton Jr., 301–331. New York: Springer Science + Business Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kane, A.W. (ed.). 2012. Special issue: Focussed series – Forensic psychology. Psychological Injury and Law, 5.Google Scholar
  36. Kane, A.W., and J.A. Dvoskin. 2011. Evaluation for personal injury claims. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Koch, W.J., K.S. Douglas, T.L. Nicholls, and M.L. O’Neill. 2006. Psychological injuries: Forensic assessment, treatment, and law. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Kumho Tire Company v. Carmichael, 119 S. Ct, 1167 (1999).Google Scholar
  39. Lareau, C.R. 2011. Posttraumatic stress disorder and acute stress disorder. In Coping with psychiatric and psychological testimony, 6th ed, ed. D. Faust, 610–635. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Larrabee, G.J. (ed.). 2007. Assessment of malingered neuropsychological deficits. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Larrabee, G.J. 2012. Assessment of malingering. In Forensic neuropsychology: A scientific approach, 2nd ed, ed. G.J. Larrabee, 116–159. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Martindale, D.A., and J.W. Gould. 2013. Ethics in forensic practice. In Handbook of psychology: Vol. 11. Forensic psychology, 2nd ed, ed. I.B. Weiner and R.K. Otto, 37–61. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  43. Meyer, G.J., D.J. Viglione, J.L. Mihura, R.E. Erard, and P. Erdberg. 2011. Rorschach Performance Assessment System: Administration, coding, interpretation, and technical manual. Toledo: Rorschach Performance Assessment System, LLC.Google Scholar
  44. Morey, L.C. 1991. Personality assessment inventory: Professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  45. Morey, L. 2007. Personality Assessment inventory: Professional manual, 2nd ed. Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  46. Otto, R.K., and A.M. Goldstein. 2013. Overview of forensic psychology. In Handbook of psychology: Vol. 11. Forensic psychology, 2nd ed, ed. R.K. Otto and I.B. Weiner, 3–15. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  47. Otto, R.K., and I.B. Weiner. 2013. Handbook of psychology: Vol. 11. Forensic psychology, 2nd ed. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  48. Packer, I.K., and R. Borum. 2013. Forensic training and practice. In Handbook of psychology: Vol. 11. Forensic psychology, 2nd ed, ed. R.K. Otto and I.B. Weiner, 16–36. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  49. Piechowski, L.D. 2013. Disability and worker’s compensation. In Handbook of psychology: Vol. 11. Forensic psychology, 2nd ed, ed. R.K. Otto and I.B. Weiner, 201–224. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  50. Pope, K., and M. Vasquez. 2011. Ethics in psychotherapy and counseling: A practical guide. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. R. v. Mohan. 1994. 2 S.C. R. 9, 1994 CanLII 80 (S.C.C.).Google Scholar
  52. Rogers, R. (ed.). 2008. Clinical assessment of malingering and deception, 3rd ed. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  53. Rogers, R., and S.D. Bender. 2013. Evaluation of malingering and related response styles. In Handbook of psychology: Vol. 11. Forensic psychology, 2nd ed, ed. R.K. Otto and I.B. Weiner, 517–540. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  54. Rogers, R., R.M. Bagby, and S.E. Dickens. 1992. Structured interview of reported symptoms. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  55. Rogers, R., K.W. Sewell, and N.D. Gillard. 2010. Structured interview of reported symptoms, second edition: Professional manual. Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  56. Rogers, R., S.D. Bender, and S.F. Johnson. 2011a. A critical analysis of the MND criteria for feigned cognitive impairment: Implications for forensic practice and research. Psychological Injury and Law 4: 147–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rogers, R., S.D. Bender, and S.F. Johnson. 2011b. A commentary on the MND model and the Boone critique: “Saying it doesn’t make it so”. Psychological Injury and Law 4: 162–167.Google Scholar
  58. Rondinelli, R.D., E. Genovese, R.T. Katz, T.G. Mayer, K.L. Müller, M.I. Ranavaya, and C.R. Brigham. 2008. Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment, 6th ed. Chicago: American Medical Association.Google Scholar
  59. Rosen, G.M., and B.K. Grunert. 2012. Posttraumatic stress disorder in the workplace. In Neuropsychological assessment of work-related injuries, ed. S.S. Bush and G.L. Iverson, 163–186. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  60. Rubenzer, S. 2009. Posttraumatic stress disorder: Assessing response style and malingering. Psychological Injury and Law 2: 114–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ruff, R., and P.M. Richards (eds.). 2009. Special issue on traumatic brain injury. Psychological Injury and Law, 3.Google Scholar
  62. Schatman, M.E., and R.J. Gatchel (eds.). 2010. Special issue on traumatically induced pain. Psychology Injury and Law, 3.Google Scholar
  63. Schultz, I.Z. (ed.). 2009. Special issue: Disability and return to work. Psychological Injury and Law, 2.Google Scholar
  64. Schultz, I.Z., and R.J. Gatchel. 2009. Handbook of complex occupational disability claims: Early risk identification, intervention, and prevention. New York: Springer Science + Business Media.Google Scholar
  65. Schultz, I.Z., and E.S. Rogers (eds.). 2011. Work accommodation and retention in mental health. New York: Springer Science + Business Media.Google Scholar
  66. Slick, D.J., G. Hopp, E. Strauss, and G.B. Thompson. 1997/2005. Victoria Symptom Validity Test. Professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  67. Slick, D.J., E.M.S. Sherman, and G.L. Iverson. 1999. Diagnostic criteria for malingered neurocognitive dysfunction: Proposed standards for clinical practice and research. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 13: 545–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Slick, D.J., and E.M.S. Sherman. 2013. Differential diagnosis of malingering. In Mild traumatic brain injury: System validity assessment and malingering, ed. D.A. Carone and S.S. Bush, 57–72. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  69. Tombaugh, T.N. 1996. TOMM: The Test of Memory Malingering manual. North Tonawanda: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
  70. United States Government Printing Office. 2011. Federal rules of evidence. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCODE-2011-title28/pdf/USCODE-2011-title28-app-federalru-dup2.pdf
  71. Young, G. 2008a. Psychological injury and law: Introduction to the first issue. Psychological Injury and Law 1: 7–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Young, G. 2008b. Psychotherapy for psychological injury: A biopsychosocial and forensic perspective. Psychological Injury and Law 1: 287–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Young, G. 2008c. Psychological injury and law: An integrative model. Psychological Injury and Law 1: 150–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Young, G. 2010. Causes in the construction of causal law: A psycho-ecological model. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 32: 73–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Young, G. 2011. Erratum to: Trends in psychological/psychiatric injury and law: Continuing education, practice comments, recommendations. Psychological Injury and Law 4: 56–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Young, G. 2013. Special issue: DSM-5. Psychological Injury and Law 6.Google Scholar
  77. Young, G. 2014. Malingering, feigning, and response bias in psychiatric/psychological injury. Dordrecht: Springer SBM.Google Scholar
  78. Young, G., and M.B. First (eds.). 2010. Special issue: The DSM-5 draft: Implications for psychological injury and law. Psychological Injury and Law, 3.Google Scholar
  79. Young, G., A.W. Kane, and K. Nicholson. 2006. Psychological knowledge in court: PTSD, pain, and TBI. New York: Springer Science + Business Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Young, G., A.W. Kane, and K. Nicholson. 2007. Causality of psychological injury: Presenting evidence in court. New York: Springer Science + Business Media.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerald Young
    • 1
  1. 1.Glendon CollegeYork UniversityTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations