Corrosion Monitoring and Nondestructive Testing in Systems Containing Fuels

Chapter

Abstract

Corrosion monitoring methods are the control methods of corrosion situation. Nondestructive Testing (NDT) is a wide group of analysis techniques used in industry for evaluation the properties of materials without causing damage. Visual examination, ultrasonic testing (UT), eddy current and their modifications, acoustic emission (AE), radiography, infrared thermography, penetrant testing, magnetic and electromagnetic methods as NDT techniques using in systems containing fuels are described. On-site chemical analysis of alloys also is described. Weight Loss (WL) and electrical resistance (ER) methods are analysed. Examination and control of the environment include chemical analytical, physico-chemical, physical, and microbiological analysis of media (crude oil, fuels, water, two-phase solution, gaseous phase, and soil) which contact surface of tanks and pipes. Control of the interphase metal–environment is based on its physico-chemical properties and includes electrochemical methods, identification of corrosion products and deposits, and examination of the morphology of the metal surface.

On-line real-time corrosion monitoring methods including cathodic protection efficiency that found wide use for corrosion monitoring in systems containing fuels also are described. Maximum recommended intervals between inspections of tanks containing different fuels are given. Standards for corrosion monitoring and testing are recommended. Rich bibliography is given on each topic.

Keywords

Corrosion Rate Acoustic Emission Cathodic Protection Ultrasonic Technique Infrared Thermography 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Cheeke JDN. (2012) Fundamentals and applications of ultrasonic waves, 2nd edn. CRC, LLC, USA, p 504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lavarde C (2010) Rightrax corrosion monitoring, Appendix 13. In: Minutes of EFC WP15 corrosion in the refinery industry, 22 June 2010. Budapest (slides nos. 85–108)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mažeika L, Kažys R, Raišutis R, Šliteris R. (2007) Ultrasonic guided wave tomography for the inspection of the fuel tanks floor, 4th International Conference on NDT, 11–14 October 2007, Chania, Crete, Greece, 2007, p 8Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Al-Barout M et al (2010) Non-intrusive online multi-sensors for pipeline corrosion monitoring “Field testing”, paper No. 10174, CORROSION 2010, NACE International, USA, 2010, p 12Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pei J, Yousuf MI, Degertekin FL, Honein BV, Khuri-Yakub BT. (1995) Lamb wave tomography and its application in pipe erosion/corrosion monitoring. Proceeding IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 1995, pp 755–758Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rivera H et al (2010) Guided waves methodology application in the analysis of pipeline integrity of docks along Pacific Coast and Mexico Gulf, Paper No. 10067, CORROSION 2010, NACE International, USA, 2010, p 11Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ho KS, Billson DR, Hutchins DA. (2007) Ultrasonic lamb wave tomography using scanned EMATs and wavelet processing. Nondestruct Test Eva 22(1):19–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    BS EN 16018. (2009) Non-destructive testing. Terminology. Terms used in ultrasonic testing with phased arrays, 2009, p 35Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Olympus NDT. (2007) Advances in phased array ultrasonic technology applications, p 491Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Drinkwater BW, Wilcox PD. (2006 Oct) Ultrasonic arrays for non-destructive evaluation: a review. NDT&E Int, 39(7):525–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Muravin B. (2009) Acoustic emission science and technology. J Build Infrastructure Eng Israeli Assoc Eng Architects, p 10 (In Hebrew)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    ASTM E1316-10a. (2010) Standard terminology for nondestructive examinations. ASTM International, USA, p 33Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Muravin GB, Lezvinskaya LM, Makarova NO, Pavlovskaya GS. (1990) Problems in the acoustic-emission diagnosis of the corrosion process (review). Plenum Publishing Corporation, 1990, pp. 100–109 (Translation from Journal Defektoskopiya, in Russian 1990, No 2, pp 18–28)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Muravin GB. (2000) Inspection, diagnostics and monitoring of construction materials and structures by the acoustic emission method. Minerva Press, Minerva, London, p 480Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    ASTM E1419-00. (2000) Standard test method for examination of seamless, gas-filled, pressure vessels using acoustic emission. ASTM International, USA, 2000, p 6Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yuyama S, Nishida T. (2002) Acoustic emission evaluation of corrosion damages in buried pipes of refinery. Progress in Acoustic Emission XI, The Japanese Society for NDI, pp 197–204Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cole P, Watson J. (2005) Acoustic emission for corrosion detection. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Middle Nondestructive Testing Conference & Exhibition, 27–30 Nov 2005, Bahrain, Manama, p 7Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Muravin G, Muravin B, Kralj S, Garašić I, Vručinić GG. (2007) Investigation of weld joints of LPG pressure vessel made from A516 Grade 70 steel. In: Proceedings of the IIW (International Institute of Welding) International Conference Welding & Materials Technical, Economic and Ecological Aspects, Dubrovnik & Cavtat, Croatia, 1–8 July 2007, pp 465–474Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Baeté C, Straetmans S, Buelens C, Surgeon M. (2004) Non intrusive inspection of aboveground storage tanks. In: Proceedings EUROCORR 2004, 12–16 Sept. 2004, European Federation of Corrosion, Nice, France, p 1Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Daniel Efird K. (1986) Testing coatings using acoustic emission technology. In: Moran GC, Labine P (eds), Corrosion monitoring in industrial plants using nondestructive testing and electrochemical methods. ASTM STP 908, ASTM, USA, p 515Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fregonese M, Jaubert L, Cètre Y. (2007 June 1) Contribution of acoustic emission technique for monitoring damage of rubber coating on metallic surfaces. Comparison with electrochemical measurements. Prog Org Coat 59(3):239–243Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Csizinszky L. (2003) New NDT technologies in pipeline and tank inspection. In: Proceedings EUROCORR 2003, 28 Sept.–2 Oct. 2003. European Federation of Corrosion, Budapest, Hungary, 2003, p 5Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Atherton L, Laursen P, Siebert MA. (1993) Small–diameter MFL detector overcoming technical hurdles. Pipe Line Ind 76:69–73Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Goldfine N, Greig NA. (1994) Using electromagnetic sensors (magnetometers and dielectrometers) to detect corrosion beneath and moisture within paint coatings on aircraft, CORROSION/94, Paper No. 94353, NACE International, USA, 1994.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Al-Oadah AO et.al. (2007) In-line inspection with high resolution electro-magnetic acoustic transducer (EMAT) technology crack detection and coating disbondment, CORROSION 2007, Paper No. 07131, NACE International, USA, 2007, p 7Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    EFC (European Federation of Corrosion) Working Party 15 Meeting: 15th September 2004, Corrosion Under Insulation, Guideline, 2004Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Crouzen P, Verstijnen W, Munns IJ, Hulsey RC. (2006) Application of pulsed Eddy current corrosion monitoring in refineries and oil production facilities, CORROSION 2006, Paper No. 06312, NACE International, USA, 2006, p 9Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Amir N, Barzelay O, Yefet A, Pechter T. (2008) Condenser tube examination using acoustic pulse reflectometry. In: Proceedings of POWER2008, ASME Power 2008, July 22–24, 2008, Orlando, Florida, USA, p 5Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sheppard K, Zagrai A, Donskoy D. (2007) A non-linear acoustic, vibro-modulation, technique for the detection and monitoring of contact-type defects, including those associated with corrosion. Corros Rev 25(1–2):81–96Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Meo M, Zumpano G, Polimeno U. (2007) Corrosion identification on an aluminium plate-like structure by monitoring the wave propagation phenomena. Corros Rev 25(1–2):213–232Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Niccolls EH, Gallon AE, Yamamoto K. (2008) Systematic integration of advanced NDE and corrosion monitoring for improved refinery reliability, CORROSION 2008, Paper No. 08280, NACE International, USA, 2008, p 11Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Agarwala VS, Ahmad S. (2000) Corrosion and monitoring—a review, CORROSION 2000, Paper No. 00271, NACE International, USA, 2000, p 19Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Twomey M. (1997) Inspection techniques for detecting corrosion under insulation. Mater Eval 55:29–132.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    McConnell MD. (2010) Application of thermography in diagnosing corrosion and material issues in today’s refinery, Paper No. 10362, CORROSION 2010, NACE International, USA, 2010, p 14Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Han J-S, Park J-H. (2004) Detection of corrosion steel under organic coating by infrared photography. Corros Sci 46:787–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Jönsson M, Rendahl B, Annergren I. (2009) The use of infrared thermography in the corrosion science area. In: Proceedings EUROCORR 2009, Nice, France, 6–10 September, 2009, Paper No. 7983, p 13Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    National Association of Corrosion Engineers. (2009) Handheld x-ray technology identifies alloy composition of critical metal piping in petrochemical plants. Mater Performance 48(12):18–20.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zhou Z, Zhou K, Hou X, Luo H. (2005 May) Arc/Spark optical emission spectrometry: principles, instrumentation, and recent applications. Appl Spectrosc Rev 40(2):165–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Scanlan RJ, Valbuena RR, Harrison IM, Rengifo R. (2008) A refinery approach to address corrosion under insulation, Paper No. 08558, CORROSION 2008, NACE International, USA, 2008, p 35Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    McKinney KE, Busch FJM, Blaauw A, Etheridge A. (2010) Development of risk assessment and inspection strategies for external corrosion management, Paper No. 05557, CORROSION 2005, NACE International, USA, 2010, p 13Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Pechacek RW. (2003) Advanced NDE methods of inspecting insulated vessels and piping for ID corrosion and corrosion under insulation (CUI), Paper No. 03031, CORROSION 2003, NACE International, USA, 2003, p 9Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Erickson TH, Dash LC, Murali JJ, Ayers CR. (2010) Predicting the progression of wetness and corrosion under insulation damage in aboveground pipelines, Paper No. 10373, CORROSION 2010, NACE International, USA, 2010, p 10Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    NACE Standard RP0775-2005. (2005) Preparation, installation, analysis, and interpretation of corrosion coupons in oilfield operations, NACE International, USA, 2005, p 10Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    NACE Standard RP0497-2004. (2004) Field corrosion evaluation using metallic test specimens, NACE International, USA, Item No. 21083, 2004, p 26Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    ASTM G4-01. (2008) Standard guide for conducting corrosion tests in field applications, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 03. 02, 2008, p 9Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    ASTM G31-72. (2004) Standard practice for laboratory immersion corrosion testing of metals, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 03. 02, 2008, p 8Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    ASTM G1-03. (2008) Standard practice for preparing, cleaning and evaluating corrosion test specimens, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, vol. 03. 02, 2008, p 9Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Groysman A. (2010) Corrosion for everybody. Springer, pp 193–230Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Groysman A. (2009) Corrosion monitoring. Corros Rev 27(4–5):205–343.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Groysman A. (2008) Corrosion monitoring in industry. In: Mudali UK, Raj B (eds), Corrosion science and technology. Narosa Publishing House, New Delhi, pp 500–550Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Groysman A. (2005) Anti-corrosion management and environment at the oil refining industry. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Corrosion CORCON2005, 28th–30th November 2005, Chennai, India, 2005, p 18Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Barbalat M et al (2010) Influence of soil corrosivity on the corrosion rate of X70 steel pipeline, In: Proceedings EUROCORR 2010, Moscow, Russia, 10–14 September, 2010, Paper No. 9530, p 16Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Freitas DS et al. (2010) Methodology for evaluation of soil corrosivity in buried pipelines for different regions of Rio de Janeiro. In: Proceedings EUROCORR 2010, Moscow, Russia, 10–14 September, 2010, Paper No. 9328, p 13Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Abdulhadi A et al. (2007) Field and laboratory experiences with advanced electrical resistance online corrosion monitoring system, CORROSION 2007, Paper No. 07265, NACE International, USA, 2007, p 10Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    ASTM G96-90. (2008) Standard guide for online monitoring of corrosion in plant equipment (electrical and electrochemical methods). Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 03.02, USA, 2008, p 10Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Brown GK, Davies JR, Hemblade BJ. (2000) Real time metal loss internal monitoring, CORROSION 2000, Paper No. 278, NACE International, USA, 2000, p 16Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Welsh RA, Benfield J. (2006) Environmental protection through automated remote monitoring of fuel storage tank bottoms using electrical resistance probes. Mater Performance 45(3):38–40.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    NACE International Publication 05107. (2007) Report on corrosion probes in soil or concrete, NACE International, USA, 2007, p 21Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Marshakov A, Petrunin M, Ignatenko V. (2010) Monitoring of external corrosion of underground pipelines. In: Proceedings EUROCORR 2010, Moscow, Russia, 10–14 September 2010, Paper No. 9673, p 19Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Esaklul K, Ballard A. (2007) Challenges in the design of corrosion and erosion monitoring for a deepwater subsea equipment—stretching the limits of technology, CORROSION 2007, Paper No. 07338, NACE International, USA, 2007, p 8Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Hernandez J, Kane R, Briegel K, Clark R. (2008) Real-time, online corrosion monitoring & process optimization through the chemical plant control system, CORROSION 2008, Paper No. 08281, NACE International, USA, 2008, p 14Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Kane R, Eden D, Amidi S, Delve D. (2007) Implementation of real-time corrosion monitoring with industrial process control and automation, CORROSION 2007, Paper No. 07268, NACE International, USA, 2008, p 16Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Rothwell N, Tullmin M. (2000) The corrosion monitoring handbook. Coxmoor Publishing Company, UK, p 180Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    McGarry N, Perkins A (2013) Improved asset management of a gas processing facility by an automated corrosion management system, Rohrback Cosasco Systems, USA, Technical Paper, 13 pGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Eden DA, Srinivasan S. (2004) Real-time, on-line and on-board: the use of computers, enabling corrosion monitoring to optimize process control, CORROSION/2004, Paper No. 04059, NACE International, USA, 2004, p 16Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Kane RD, Eden DC, Amidi S, Delve D. (2007) Implementation of real-time corrosion monitoring with industrial process control & automation, CORROSION 2007, Paper No. 07268, NACE International, USA, 2007, p 16Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Morgan N, Winslow CM, Howard C. (2005) Development and implementation strategies for safe & profitable opportunity crude processing, Technical Paper GE Betz TP1005EN 0503, 2005, p 9Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Lasiuk B, Wilson M, Winslow C. (2005) Advances in optimizing refinery profitability, Technical Report GE Betz AM-05-13, January 2005, p 12Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Winslow MC, Wilson M, Lasiuk B, Allison P, Cross C. (2005) Solutions for processing opportunity crudes, ERTC (European Refining Technology Conference) 10th Annual Meeting, Vienna, Austria, November 2005, p 14Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Jackson T, Winslow MC, Wilson M. (2004) Prolonged experience processing high acid crude—cross oil & refining company, ERTC 9th Annual Meeting, Prague, Czech Republic, November 2004Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Strommen RD, Horn H, Wold KR. (1993 Dec 27) New technique monitors pipeline corrosion cracking. Oil Gas J 91:88–92.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Mathers R. (2005) Treatment of high acid crudes and the methods used in refineries to mitigate naphthenic acid corrosion. In: Proceedings EUROCORR 2005, 4–8 Sept. 2005, European Federation of Corrosion, Lisbon, Portugal, 2005, p 11Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Horn H, Sivertsen ST, Pedersen AE. (2003) Evaluation of the accuracy of a subsea system for internal corrosion monitoring based on a retrieved pipe, CORROSION/2003, Paper No. 03425, NACE International, USA, 2003, p 16Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Claesen C, Kulic M. (2010) Progress in petroleum refinery high temperature sulfidic corrosion inhibition. In: Proceedings EUROCORR 2010, Moscow, Russia, 10–14 September, 2010, Paper No. 9595, p 10Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    NACE SP0208. (2008) Internal corrosion direct assessment methodology for liquid petroleum pipelines, NACE International, USA, 2008, p 35Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Raj B, Jayakumar T, Sharma GK. (2008) NDE techniques for assessment of corrosion damage in materials and components In: Kamachi Mudali U, Raj B (eds) Corrosion science and technology. Narosa Publishing House, New Delhi, pp 416–467Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    NACE International Publication 1D199. (1999) Internal corrosion monitoring of subsea production and injection systems, Item No. 24202, NACE International, USA, 1999, p 13Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    NACE SP0206. (2006). Standard practice internal corrosion direct assessment methodology for pipelines carrying normally dry natural gas (DG-ICDA), NACE International, USA, 2006, p 24Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Faritov AT, Gumerov AG, Hudyakova LP. (2010) Corrosion monitoring system and oil field pipelines database software. In: Proceedings EUROCORR 2010, Moscow, Russia, 13–17 September, 2010, Paper No. 9663, p 12Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Al-Oadah AO et al. (2007) In-line inspection with high resolution electro-magnetic acoustic transducer (EMAT) technology crack detection and coating disbondment, CORROSION 2007, Paper No. 07131, NACE International, USA, 2007, p 7Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Sridhar N, Tormoen G, Sean Brossia C, Sabata A. (2006) Development and application of mobile sensor network to monitor corrosion in pipelines, CORROSION 2006, Paper No. 06322, NACE International, USA, 2006, p 17Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Gu P, Zheng W, Revie RW. (2007) Intelligent pipeline monitoring system, CORROSION 2007, Paper No. 07267, NACE International, USA, 2007, p 11Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    ANSI/ASME B31G-1991 (R2004). (2004) Manual for Determining the Remaining Strength of Corroded Pipelines, a Supplement to ASME B31 Code for Pressure Piping, ASME, New York, USA, 2004, p 55Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    ASTM E317-06a. Standard practice for evaluating performance characteristics of ultrasonic pulse-echo testing instruments and systems without the use of electronic measurement instruments, ASTM Book of Standards, Vol 03.03, ASTM International, USA, p 13Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Vjunitsky I et al. (2007) Principles of reliable operation of main oil pipelines exposed to active corrosion and corrosion mechanical influence in Russia. In: Proceedings EUROCORR 2007, 9–13 Sept. 2007, European Federation of Corrosion, Freiburg, Germany, 2007, p 7Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    NACE International Publication 35100. (2012) In-Line Inspection of Pipelines, NACE International, USA, 2012, 42 pGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Greenwood C. (2006) Pigging the diesel pipeline between Hawaii’s Red Hill Facility and Pearl Harbor. Mater Performance 45(3):16–19Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Jassim Al-Maslamani M, Chaudhuri PK, Queenan ED. (2003) Validation of intelligent PIG inspection data for management of pipeline corrosion. In: Proceedings EUROCORR 2003, 28 Sept.–2 Oct. 2003, European Federation of Corrosion, Budapest, Hungary, 2003, p 10Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Gunaltun Y, Punprak S, Thammachart M, Tanaprasertsong P. (2010) Worst case top of the line corrosion: cold spot corrosion, Paper No. 10097, CORROSION 2010, NACE International, USA, 2010, p 9Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Gunaltun Y, Payne L. (2003) A new technique for the control of top of the line corrosion: TLCC-PIG, Paper No. 03344, CORROSION 2003, NACE International, USA, 2003, p 9Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Joosten M et al. (2010) Top-of-line corrosion—a field failure. In: Proceedings EUROCORR 2010, Moscow, Russia, 10–14 September, 2010, Paper No. 9524, p 15Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Rommetveit T, Johnsen R, Baltzersen Ø. (2008) Using ultrasound measurements for real-time process control of pipelines and process equipment subjected to corrosion and/or erosion, CORROSION 2008, Paper No. 08285, NACE International, USA, 2008, p 13Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Baltzersen ø et al. (2007) Wall thickness monitoring of new and existing subsea pipelines using ultrasound, CORROSION 2007, Paper No. 07333, NACE International, USA, 2007, p 9Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Stawicki O, Beuker T, Ahlbrink R, Brown B. (2010) Monitoring of top of line corrosion with Eddy current technology combined with magnetic flux leakage method, Paper No. 10094, CORROSION 2010, NACE International, USA, 2010, p 7Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Madi MS. (2003) Detection of internal & external corrosion using guided wave UT and MFL inspection techniques in Wafra Field. In: Proceedings EUROCORR 2003, 28 Sept.–2 Oct. 2003, European Federation of Corrosion, Budapest, Hungary, 2003, p 10Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Van Deventer L. (2009) Advancements in guided wave UT equipment regarding sensitivity. Mater Performance 48(2):56–58Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Van Deventer L. Advancements in GUL G-3 guided wave UT equipment regarding sensitivity. Mater Performance 48(3):58–61Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Laughlin S. (2010) Conformable array corrosion mapping tool, Paper No. 10171, CORROSION 2010, NACE International, USA, 2010, p 11Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Burwell D, Sridhar N, Moghissi OC, Perry L. (2004) Internal corrosion direct assessment of dry gas transmission pipelines—validation, CORROSION/2004, Paper No. 04195, NACE International, USA, 2004, p 17Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Moghissi OC, Perry L, Cookingham B, Sridhar N. (2004) Internal corrosion direct assessment of dry gas transmission pipelines—application, CORROSION/2003, Paper No. 03204, NACE International, USA, 2004, p 18Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Kanaykin VA, Steklov OI. (2010) Modern trunk pipeline in-line diagnostics technologies to detect corrosion-related defects. In: Proceedings EUROCORR 2010, Moscow, Russia, 10–14 September, 2010, Paper No. 4684, p 1Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Kharinovsky VV. (2010) Forecasting of the lifecycle of gas pipeline section with the corrosion defects. In: Proceedings EUROCORR 2010, Moscow, Russia, 10–14 September, 2010, Paper No. 9655, p 1Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Duesso F, Horn H, Wold KR. (1995) Qualification of the FSM technology for corrosion monitoring of a subsea pipeline at the Froy Field, CORROSION/95, Paper No. 27, NACE, USA, 1995Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Rippon IJ et al. (1994) Field evaluation of novel erosion/corrosion monitoring equipment, CORROSION/94, Paper No. 2, NACE, USA, 1994Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Strommen R, Horn H, Wold KR. (1992) FSM—a unique method for monitoring corrosion pitting, erosion and cracking, CORROSION/92, Paper No. 7, NACE, USA, 1992Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Tennyson RC, Miesner T. (2006 Feb 20) Fiber optic monitoring focuses on bending, corrosion. Oil Gas J:55–60Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Morison D. (2008) Remote monitoring of pipeline corrosion using fiber optic sensors, CORROSION 2008, Paper No. 08290, NACE International, USA, 2008, p 9Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Brown GK, Davies JR, Hemblade BJ. (2000) Solids and sand monitoring—an overview, CORROSION 2000, Paper No. 00091, NACE International, USA, 2000, p 28Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Salama MM. (2000) Performance of sand monitors, CORROSION 2000, Paper No. 00085, NACE International, USA, 2000, p 18Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    Shirazi SA, McLaury BS, Ali MM. (2000) Sand monitor evaluation in multiphase flow, CORROSION 2000, Paper No. 00084, NACE International, USA, 2000, p 19Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    Eckert RB, Cookingham B, Bensman L. (2006) Optimizing internal corrosion monitoring and response through integration of direct and indirect data, CORROSION 2006, Paper No. 06307, NACE International, 2006, USA, p 13Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    Srinivisan S, Lagad V, Kane RD. (2007) Internal corrosion assessment for dry gas and multiphase pipelines using corrosion prediction models, EUROCORR 2007, 9–13 Sept. 2007, European Federation of Corrosion, Freiburg, Germany, p 21Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    Jangama V., Srinivisan S. (1997) A computer model for prediction of corrosion of carbon steels, Corrosion/97, Paper No. 97318, NACE International, USA, 1997, p 16Google Scholar
  114. 114.
    Srinivisan S, Kane RD. (2003) Critical issues in the application and evaluation of a corrosion prediction model for oil and gas systems, Corrosion 2003, Paper No. 03640, NACE International, USA, March 2003, p 18Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    Lagad V, Srinivisan S, Kane RD. (2004) Software system for automating internal corrosion direct assessment of pipelines, CORROSION 2004, Paper No. 04197, NACE International, USA, 2004, p 16Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    Li SY, Jung S, Park K-W, Lee S-M, Kim Y-G (2007) Kinetic study on corrosion of steel in soil environments using electrical resistance sensor technique. Mater Chem Phys 103(1):9-13Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    Larsen KR. (2009) Pipeline sensors measure corrosion rate and cumulative corrosion damage. Mater Performance 48(3):24–25Google Scholar
  118. 118.
    Brown NK, Friedersdorf FJ. (2008) Corrosivity monitoring system for pipelines, CORROSION 2008, Paper No. 08203, NACE International, USA, 2008, p 17Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    Tennyson RC, Morison WD, Manuelpillai G, Revie W. (2004) Application of fiber optic sensors to monitor pipeline corrosion, CORROSION 2004, Paper No. 04739, NACE International, USA, 2004, p 18Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    Tennyson RC, Morison WD, Manuelpillai G. (2005) Monitoring pipeline integrity using fiber optic sensors, CORROSION 2005, Paper No. 05134, NACE International, USA, 2005, p 8Google Scholar
  121. 121.
    API RP 1632(2002) (1996) Cathodic protection of underground petroleum storage tanks and piping systems, 3rd edn. American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC, p 11Google Scholar
  122. 122.
    ANSI/API RP 651. (2007) Cathodic protection of aboveground petroleum storage tanks, 3rd edn. American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC, p 33Google Scholar
  123. 123.
    NACE Standard RP0193-2001. (2001) External cathodic protection of on-grade carbon steel storage tank bottoms. NACE International, Houston, p 23Google Scholar
  124. 124.
    NACE Standard RP0285-2002. (2002) Corrosion control of underground storage tank systems by cathodic protection. NACE International, Houston, p 18Google Scholar
  125. 125.
    NACE Standard TM0101-2012. (2012) Measurement techniques related to criteria for cathodic protection on underground or submerged metallic tank systems. NACE International, Houston, p 30Google Scholar
  126. 126.
    ASTM G158-98. (2010) Standard guide for three methods of assessing buried steel tanks, Book of Standards, vol. 03.02, ASTM International, USA, 2010, p 10Google Scholar
  127. 127.
    NACE Standard SP0169-2007 (formerly RP0169-2002). (2007) Control of external corrosion on underground or submerged metallic piping systems. NACE International, Houston, p 32Google Scholar
  128. 128.
    NACE Standard RP TM0109-2009. (2009) Aboveground survey techniques for the evaluation of underground pipeline coating condition. NACE International, USA, 2009, p 35Google Scholar
  129. 129.
    NACE Standard RP SP0502-2010 (formerly RP0502). (2010) Pipeline external corrosion direct assessment methodology. NACE International, USA, p 57Google Scholar
  130. 130.
    NACE Standard SP0207-2007. (2007) Standard practice performing close-interval potential surveys and DC surface potential gradient surveys on buried or submerged metallic pipelines. NACE International, USA, p 51Google Scholar
  131. 131.
    Lukacs Z, Gabor L, Fodor Gy (2003) Equipment and computerized evaluation technology for close interval potential survey (CIPS) on cathodic protection of pipelines. In: Proceedings EUROCORR 2003, 28 Sept.–2 Oct. 2003, European Federation of Corrosion, Budapest, Hungary, 2003, p 8Google Scholar
  132. 132.
    Segall SM, Reid RG, Gummow RA. (2006) Use of an integrated CIPS/DCVG survey in the ECDA Process, Paper No. 06193, CORROSION 2006, NACE International, USA, 2006, p 12Google Scholar
  133. 133.
    Segall SM, Gummow RA, Shore J, Reid RG. (2010) Ensuring the accuracy of indirect inspections data in the ECDA Process, Paper No. 10061, CORROSION 2010, NACE International, USA, p 13Google Scholar
  134. 134.
    Godoy A et al. (2010) Numerical modeling of cathodic protection system looking for present condition evaluation and improvement of pipeline network at Manzanillo, Mexico, Paper No. 10068, CORROSION 2010, NACE International, USA, p 8Google Scholar
  135. 135.
    API Standard 650. (2007) Welded steel tanks for oil storage, 11th edn. American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC, p 436Google Scholar
  136. 136.
    API Standard 653. (2009) Tank inspection, repair, alteration and reconstruction, 4th edn. American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC, p 164Google Scholar
  137. 137.
    ANSI/API RP 575. (2005) Guidelines and methods for inspection of existing atmospheric and low-pressure storage tanks, 2nd edn. American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC, p 60Google Scholar
  138. 138.
    NACE Standard RP0288-2004. (2004) Inspection of linings on steel and concrete, NACE International, USA, 2004, p 7Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Association of Engineers and Architects in IsraelIsraeli Society of Chemical Engineers & ChemistsTel AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations