Theoretical Foundation for Spirituality-Oriented Holistic Art Education: Integration of Eastern and Western Aesthetics

Chapter
Part of the Landscapes: the Arts, Aesthetics, and Education book series (LAAE, volume 13)

Abstract

After the trends of modernistic and post-modernistic paradigms, the values and methodology of art education need to be reconsidered and developed for current educational situations. Art education for college and school (grade 1–12) in Taiwan has new challenges to meet and needs further theoretical fuel and foundational interpretation. The recent trend of spirituality and holistic development in art education should be able to provide a suitable perspective for the improvement of collegial and school (grade 1–12) art education. Therefore, this chapter attempts to analyze and interpret concepts related to spirituality and holistic art education, including Eastern and Western aesthetics, to develop a theoretical foundation for spirituality-oriented holistic art education. The objectives of this article are twofold: (a) to deal with the values pertaining to spirituality-oriented holistic art education, and (b) to analyze the dimensions of art teaching and learning, including self inquiry, the connection of self with art, culture, and ecology, and spiritual intelligence in art education.

Keywords

Aesthetic Experience Spiritual Development Holistic Development Spiritual Intelligence Holistic Education 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Anderson, T., & Milbrandt, M. K. (2002). Art for life: Authentic instruction in art. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  2. Armstrong, C. (1990). Teaching art in a multicultural/multiethnic society. In B. Young (Ed.), Art, culture, and ethnicity (pp. 97–114). Reston: National Art Education Association.Google Scholar
  3. Atkinson, D. (2002). Art in education: Identity and practice. Philip Drive: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  4. Baas, J. (2005). Smile of Buddha: Eastern philosophy and Western art from Monet to today. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bancroft, A. (1995). Zen: Direct pointing to reality. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
  6. Beardsley, M. C. (1981). Aesthetics: Problems in the philosophy of criticism (2nd ed.). Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
  7. Bochenski, J. M. (1968). The methods of contemporary thought. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  8. Boyer, B. A. (1987). Cultural literacy in art: Developing conscious aesthetic choices in art education. In D. Blandy & K. G. Congdon (Eds.), Art in a democracy (pp. 91–105). New York: Teachers College Press/Columbia University.Google Scholar
  9. Braud, W. (2006). Educating the “more” in holistic transpersonal higher education: A 30+ year perspective on the approach of the institute of transpersonal psychology. The Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 38(2), 133–158.Google Scholar
  10. Campbell, L. H. (2006). Spirituality and holistic art education. Visual Arts Research, 32(1), 29–34.Google Scholar
  11. Campbell, L. H. (2007). Art, spirituality, and teaching. In B. W. Speck & S. L. Hoppe (Eds.), Search for spirituality in higher education. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  12. Chang, C. Y. (1975). Tao: A new way of thinking – A translation of the Tao Te Ching with an introduction and commentaries. Taipei: Dun Huang Book Co.Google Scholar
  13. Collins, G., & Sandell, R. (1992). The politics of multicultural art education. Studies in Art Education, 45(6), 8–13.Google Scholar
  14. Cousins, E. (1996). Preface to the series. In P. Van Ness (Ed.), Spirituality and the secular quest. New York: Crossroad.Google Scholar
  15. de Souza, M. (2009). Promoting wholeness and wellbeing in education: Exploring aspects of the spiritual dimension. In M. de Souza et al. (Eds.), International handbooks of education for spirituality, care, and wellbeing (International handbooks of religion and education 3, pp. 677–692). Dordrecht/New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dobbs, S. M. (2004). Discipline-based art education. In E. W. Eisner & M. D. Day (Eds.), Handbook of research and policy in art education (pp. 701–724). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  17. Duncum, P. (2000). Art education and visual culture. Paper presented at 2000 international visual arts conference, Taipei, Taiwan.Google Scholar
  18. Efland, A., Freedman, K., & Stuhr, P. (1996). Postmodern art education: An approach to curriculum. Reston: National Art Education Association.Google Scholar
  19. Eisner, E. W. (1972). Educating artistic vision. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  20. Eisner, E. W. (1981/2003). On the differences between scientific and artistic approaches to qualitative research. Visual Arts Research, 29(57), 5–11.Google Scholar
  21. Forbes, S. (1996). Values in holistic education. The third annual conference on education, spirituality, and the whole child at the Roehampton Institute, London.Google Scholar
  22. Franck, F. (1993). Zen seeing, zen drawing: Meditation in action. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  23. Fromm, E. (1998). The essential Fromm: Life between having and being. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  24. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  25. Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence framed. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  26. Grady, M. (2006). Art and consciousness – The pedagogy of art and transformation. Visual Arts Research, 32(1), 83–91.Google Scholar
  27. Hamblen, K. (1997). The emergence of Neo-DBAE. In J. Hutchens & M. Suggs (Eds.), Art education: Content and practice in a postmodern era (pp. 40–46). Reston: National Art Education Association.Google Scholar
  28. Hsin, K. C. (1973). Confucius on art and poetry. Taipei: Political Warfare College.Google Scholar
  29. Kandinsky, W. (1914/1977). Concerning the spiritual in art (M. T. H. Sadler, Trans.). New York: Dover.Google Scholar
  30. Kessler, R. (2000). The soul of education: Helping students find connection, compassion, and character at school. Compassion, and character at school. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  31. Koppman, D. (2002). Transformation, invocation, and magic in contemporary art, education, and criticism: Reinvesting art with a sense of the sacred. In Y. Gaudelius & P. Speirs (Eds.), Contemporary issues in art education (pp. 130–140). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  32. Lerner, M. (2000). Spirit matters. Charlottesville: Walsch Books.Google Scholar
  33. Liu, F. J. (2006). Theories on approaches to visual signs: From iconography, to semiotics, and Lacan’s innovation of semiotics. Visual Arts Forum, 1, 7–21 (In Chinese).Google Scholar
  34. Liu, F. J. (2007). Values of art and its functions for holistic development in post-modern cultures. In C. R. Ran (Ed.), Studies in holistic development of life in the truth, goodness and beauty. Chiayi County: Center of Humanities and Arts, College of Humanities and Arts, National Chiayi University, Taiwan (In Chinese).Google Scholar
  35. Liu, F. J. (2009). The implications of modern and postmodern perspectives of art for studying Taiwanese art theories and artistic production. Visual Arts Forum, 4, 1–16 (In Chinese).Google Scholar
  36. Liu, F. J. (2010). Rationale and content dimensions for teaching spirituality-oriented holistic artistic production: College art education after postmodernism. Visual Arts Forum, 5, 3–20 (In Chinese).Google Scholar
  37. Liu, F. J. (2011). The Perspectives and collegial art instructional frame work of spiritual intelligence and holistic development in art. Journal of Arts Research, 7, 1–26 (In Chinese).Google Scholar
  38. Liu, F. J. (2012). Spirituality in art and the values of spirituality oriented holistic art education. In Proceedings of conference of new spirituality in post-postmodern art (1st ed., pp. 52–63). Chiayi/Taiwan: National Chiayi University (In Chinese).Google Scholar
  39. London, P. (1989). No more secondhand art: Awakening the artist within. Boston: Shambhala Publications.Google Scholar
  40. London, P. (2006). Towards a holistic paradigm of art education – Art education: Mind, body, spirit. Visual Arts Research, 32(1), 8–15.Google Scholar
  41. Lowenfeld, V. (1947). Creative and mental growth (1st ed.). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  42. Lowenfeld, V., & Brittain, W. (1964). Creative and mental growth (4th ed.). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  43. Lowenfeld, V., & Brittain, W. (1987). Creative and mental growth (8th ed.). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  44. Miller, J. P. (2000). Education and the soul. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  45. Neperud, R. W. (1995a). Transitions in art education: A search for meaning. In R. W. Neperud (Ed.), Context, content, and community in art education: Beyond postmodernism (pp. 1–22). New York: Teachers College Press/Columbia University.Google Scholar
  46. Neperud, R. W. (1995b). Texture of community: An environmental design education. In R. W. Neperud (Ed.), Context, content, and community in art education: Beyond postmodernism (pp. 1–22). New York: Teachers College Press/Columbia University.Google Scholar
  47. Painton, M. (2009). Children’s spiritual intelligence. In M. de Souza et al. (Eds.), International handbooks of education for spirituality, care, and wellbeing (International handbooks of religion and education 3, pp. 365–380). Dordrecht/New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pike, M. A. (2005). Reading and responding to biblical texts: Aesthetic distance and the spiritual journey. In C. Ota & C. Erricker (Eds.), Spiritual education: Literary, empirical and pedagogical approaches (pp. 189–201). Portland: Sussex Academic Press.Google Scholar
  49. Rader, M., & Jessup, B. (1976). Art and human values. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  50. Shearer, A. (1997). Buddha: The intelligent heart. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
  51. Shiu, F. K. (1976). The spirituality in Chinese art. Taipei: Taiwan Student Book Store (In Chinese).Google Scholar
  52. Simmon, S. (2006). Living the questions: Existential intelligence in the context of holistic art education. Visual Arts Research, 32(1), 83–91.Google Scholar
  53. Smith, R. A. (1995). Excellence II: The continuing quest in art education. Reston: National Art Education Association.Google Scholar
  54. Spiegelman, J. M., & Miyuki, M. (1994). Buddhism and Jungian psychology. Tempe: New Falcon.Google Scholar
  55. Storr, R., Sollins, S., Golden, T., Herbert, L. M., & Siegel, K. (2001). Art: 21 – Art in the twenty-first century. New York: Harry N. Abrams.Google Scholar
  56. Tacey, D. (2009). Spirituality and mental health: The mystery of healing. In M. de Souza et al. (Eds.), International handbooks of education for spirituality, care, and wellbeing (International handbooks of religion and education 3, pp. 275–290). Dordrecht/New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tavin, K. M. (2003). Wrestling with angels, searching for ghosts: Toward a critical pedagogy of visual culture. Studies in Art Education, 44(3), 197–213.Google Scholar
  58. Tisdell, E. J. (2003). Exploring spirituality and culture in adult and higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Wiley.Google Scholar
  59. Wright, A. (2000). Spirituality in education: Master classes in education series. London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Visual ArtsNational Chiayi UniversityChiayiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations