Meeting the Challenge: Quantum Physics in Introductory Physics Courses

Chapter

Abstract

Teaching quantum theory is a legendary difficult task, not only due to its weirdness, but also because it is philosophically sensitive. Examples from the history and philosophy of science show that one of the main challenges is to find a balanced approach between introducing the most basic quantum concepts while taking into account interpretational issues. Although there is no privileged interpretation for QT, teaching and research about QT must make the interpretational choice used explicit. In addition any introductory course should emphasize the strictly quantum features in order to prevent students from establishing undesirable links with classical concepts. While teaching focused on the mathematical formalism remains a choice, pictures may be exploited, but in this case complementarity should be explicitly and carefully introduced. Finally, we argue that the teaching of QT, maybe more than other areas in physics, must be informed by the history and philosophy of science.

Keywords

Science Education Quantum Theory Classical Concept Local Realism Science Education Research 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

 We are thankful to CAPES, CNPq, FAPESB, and Universidade Estadual da Paraiba, Brazil, for the support to this research. We are grateful to the editor, Michael Matthews, and the reviewers for their critical comments; to David Kaiser, for reading and commenting the paper; and to Denise Key for her help with the English.

References

  1. Aspect, A. (1999). Bell’s Inequality test: more ideal than ever. Nature, 398, 189–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aspect, A. (2007). To be or not to be local. Nature, 446, 866–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aspect, A., Grangier, P., and Roger, G. (1989). Dualité onde-particule pour un photon unique. J. Optics 20(3), 119–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baily, C., Finkelstein, N. D. (2010). Refined characterization of student perspectives on quantum physics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research 6, 020113 (1–11).Google Scholar
  5. Barnes, M. B., Garner, J. & Reid, D. (2004). The Pendulum as a Vehicle for Transitioning from Classical to Quantum Physics: History, Quantum Concepts, and Educational Challenges. Science & Education 13, 417–436.Google Scholar
  6. Barton, G. (1997). Quantum dynamics of simple systems. Contemporary Physics, 38(6), 429–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beller, M. (1999). Quantum Dialogue – The making of a revolution. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bohm, D. (1989). Quantum theory [unabridged republication of 1951]. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
  9. Bohm, D., Hiley, B. (1988). Nonlocality and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Experiment as Understood through the Quantum-Potential. In F. Selleri (ed.), Quantum Mechanics Versus Local Realism, New York: Plenum Press, 232–256.Google Scholar
  10. Bohr, N. (1987). Natural Philosophy and Human Cultures. [1938]. In Bohr, N. The Philosophical Writings of Niels Bohr, Essays 1933–1957 on Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge. Woodbridge, US-CT: Ox Bow Press, 23–31.Google Scholar
  11. Bromberg, J. L. (2006). Device physics vis-a-vis fundamental physics in Cold War America: The case of quantum optics. ISIS, 97(2), 237–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bromberg, J. L. (2008). New instruments and the meaning of quantum mechanics. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences, 38(3), 325–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brush, S. (1974). Should the History of Science Be Rated X? Science, 183(4130), 1164–1172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bunge, M. (2003). Twenty-Five Centuries of Quantum Physics: From Pythagoras to Us, and from Subjectivism to Realism. Science & Education 12(5–6), 445–466.Google Scholar
  15. Camilleri, K. (2009a). Constructing the myth of the Copenhagen interpretation. Perspectives on Science, 17(1), 26–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Camilleri, K. (2009b). A history of entanglement: Decoherence and the interpretation problem. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 40, 290–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Carr, L. D., McKagan, S. B. (2009). Graduate quantum mechanics reform. American Journal of Physics, 77(4), 308–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cataloglou, E., Robinett, R. W. (2002). Testing the development of student conceptual and visualization understanding in quantum mechanics through the undergraduate career. American Journal of Physics, 70(3), 238–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Clauser, J. F. (2002). Oral history. Interviewed by Joan Lisa Bromberg, Niels Bohr Library, American Institute of Physics, College Park, MD.Google Scholar
  20. Clauser, J. F. and Shimony, A. (1978). Bell’s theorem: experimental tests and implications. Reports on Progress in Physics, 41, 1881–1927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cuppari, A., Rinaudo, G., Robutti, O., Violino, P. (1997). Gradual introduction of some aspects of quantum mechanics in a high school curriculum. Physics Education, 32(5), 302–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cushing, J. (1999). Quantum mechanics: historical contingency and the Copenhagen interpretation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  23. Dehlinger, D., Mitchell, M. W. (2002). Entangled photon apparatus for the undergraduate laboratory. American Journal of Physics, 70(9), 898–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Eisberg, R. (1976). Applied Mathematical Physics with Programmable Pocket Calculators. New York: McGraw–Hill.Google Scholar
  25. Ferrero, M., Gómez Pin, V., Salgado, D., Sánchez-Gómez, J. L. (2012). A Further Review of the Incompatibility between Classical Principles and Quantum Postulates. Foundations of Science, DOI  10.1007/s10699-012-9290-y, published online: 15 May 2012.
  26. Fischler, H., Lichtfeldt, M. (1992). Modern physics and students’ conceptions. International Journal of Science Education, 14(2), 181–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Freire Jr. O. (2006). Philosophy Enters the Optics Laboratory: Bell’s Theorem and its First Experimental Tests (1965–1982). Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 37, 577–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Freire Jr. O. (2009). Quantum dissidents: Research on the foundations of quantum theory circa 1970. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 40, 280–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. García Quijás, P. C., Arévalo Aguilar, L. M. (2007). Overcoming misconceptions in quantum mechanics with the time evolution operator. European Journal of Physics, 28, 147–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Galvez, E. J., Holbrow, C. H., Pysher, M. J., Martin, J. W., Courtemanche, N., Heilig, L., Spencer J. (2005). Interference with correlated photons: Five quantum mechanics experiments for undergraduates. American Journal of Physics, 73(2), 127–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gingerich, O. (2004). The book nobody read: chasing the revolutions of Nicolaus Copernicus. New York: Walker & Co.Google Scholar
  32. Gleick, J. (2011). The information: a history, a theory, a flood, New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  33. Goff, A. (2006). Quantum tic-tac-toe: A teaching metaphor for superposition in quantum mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 74(11), 962–973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gottfried, K. (1978). Quantum physics series, films 1–10, film review. American Journal of Physics, 46, 315–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Graham, L. (1993). Science in Russia and the Soviet Union: A short history, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Grangier, P.; Roger, G. and Aspect, A. (1986). Experimental Evidence for a Photon Anticorrelation Effect on a Beam Splitter: A New Light on Single-Photon Interference. Europhysics Letters 1(4), 173–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Greca, I. M. & Freire Jr., O. (2003). Does an Emphasis on the Concept of Quantum States Enhance Students’ Understanding of Quantum Mechanics? Science & Education 12(5–6), 541–557.Google Scholar
  38. Greca, I. M., Moreira, M. A. (1997). The kinds of mental representations - models, propositions and images - used by college physics students regarding the concept of field. International Journal of Science Education 19, 711–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Greca, I. M., Moreira, M. A. (2002). Mental, physical and mathematical models in the teaching and learning of physics. Science Education, 86, 106–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Greenberger, D.; Hentschel, K. and Weinert, F. (eds) (2009). Compendium of Quantum Physics: Concepts, Experiments, History and Philosophy. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  41. Greenstein, G. and Zajonc, A. (1997). The Quantum Challenge – Modern Research on the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.Google Scholar
  42. Griffiths, D. J. (2005). Introduction to Quantum Mechanics [2nd ed.]. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  43. Gröblacher, S., Paterek, T., Kaltenbaek, R., Brukner, C., Zukowski, M., Aspelmeyer, M., & Zeilinger, A. (2007). An experimental test of non-local realism. Nature, 446, 871–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hadzidaki, P. (2008a). Quantum mechanics and scientific explanation: an explanatory strategy aiming at providing understanding. Science & Education, 17(1), 49–73.Google Scholar
  45. Hadzidaki, P. (2008b). The Heisenberg microscope: a powerful instructional tool for promoting meta-cognitive and meta-scientific thinking on quantum mechanics and the “nature of science”. Science & Education, 17(6), 613–639.Google Scholar
  46. Harding, S. (ed) (1976). Can Theories Be Refuted? Essays on the Duhem-Quine Thesis. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
  47. Heilbron, J. (2001). The earliest missionaries of the Copenhagen spirit. In P. Galison, M. Gordin, D. Kaiser (Eds). Science and Society - The history of modern physical science in the twentieth century. Vol. 4 - Quantum Histories. New York: Routledge, 295–330.Google Scholar
  48. Held, C. (2012). The Kochen-Specker Theorem, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2012 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), forthcoming URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2012/entries/kochen-specker/>.
  49. Hirshfeld, A. C., Henselder, P. (2002). Deformation quantization in the teaching of quantum mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 70(5), 537–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Holbrow, C. H., Galvez, E., Parks, M. E. (2002). Photon quantum mechanics and beam splitters. American Journal of Physics, 70(3), 260–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Howard, D. (1985). Einstein on locality and separability. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 16(3), 171–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Howard, D. (2004). Who invented the “Copenhagen interpretation”? A study in mythology. Philosophy of Science, 71, 669–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Jacobsen, A. (2012). Léon Rosenfeld - Physics, Philosophy, and Politics in the Twentieth Century. Singapore: World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Jacques, V. et al. (2005). Single-photon wavefront-splitting interference – An illustration of the light quantum in action. European Journal of Physics D 35, 561–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Jammer, M. (1974). The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics – The Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics in Historical Perspective. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  56. Johnston, I. D., Crawford, K., Fletcher, P. R. (1998). Student difficulties in learning quantum mechanics. International Journal of Science Education, 20(4), 427–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kaiser, D. (2007). Turning physicists into quantum mechanics. Physics World (May 2007), 28–33.Google Scholar
  58. Kaiser, D. (2011). How the Hippies Saved Physics – Science, Counterculture, and the Quantum Revival. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  59. Kalkanis, G., Hadzidaki, P., Stavrou, D. (2003). An Instructional Model for a Radical Conceptual Change Towards Quantum Mechanics Concepts. Science Education, 87, 257– 280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Karakostas,V., Hadzidaki, P. (2005). Realism vs constructivism in contemporary physics: the impact of the debate on the understanding of quantum theory and its instructional process. Science & Education, 14(5), 607–629.Google Scholar
  61. Kragh, H. (1992). A Sense of History: History of Science and The Teaching of Introductory Quantum Theory. Science & Education, 1, 349–363.Google Scholar
  62. Kragh, H. (1999). Quantum Generations: A History of Physics in the Twentieth century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Lévy-Leblond, J-M. (2003). On the nature of quantons. Science & Education 12, 495–502.Google Scholar
  64. Lévy-Leblond, J.-M. & Balibar, F. (1990). Quantics – Rudiments of Quantum Mechanics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  65. Magalhães, A. L., Vasconcelos, V. P. S. (2006). Particle in a Box: Software for computer-assisted learning in introductory quantum mechanics courses. European Journal of Physics, 27, 1425–1435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Marshall, T. and Santos, E. (1987). Comment on “Experimental Evidence for a Photon Anticorrelation Effect on a Beam Splitter: a New Light on Single-Photon Interferences”. Europhysics Letters, 3, 293–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. McDermott, L.C. & Redish, E. F. (1999). Resource letter: PER-1: Physics education research. American Journal of Physics, 67(9), 755–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. McKagan, S. B.,. Perkins, K. K., Dubson, M., Malley, C., Reid, S., LeMaster, R., Wieman, C. E. (2008). Developing and researching PhET simulations for teaching quantum mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 76(4 & 5), 406–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. McKagan, S. B., Perkins, K. K., & Wieman, C. E. (2010). Design and validation of the Quantum Mechanics Conceptual Survey. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research 6, 020121.Google Scholar
  70. Michelini, M., Ragazzon, R., Santi, R., Stefanel, A. (2000). Proposal for quantum physics in secondary school. Physics Education, 35, 406–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Müller, R., Wiesner, H. (2002). Teaching quantum mechanics on an introductory level. American Journal of Physics, 70(3), 200–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Nashon, S. Nielsen, W., Petrina, S. (2008). Whatever happened to STS? Pre-service physics teachers and the history of quantum mechanics. Science & Education, 17, 387–401.Google Scholar
  73. Nersessian, Nancy. (1992). How do scientists think? Capturing the dynamics of conceptual change in science. In: Ronald N. Giere (ed). Cognitive models of science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 3–44.Google Scholar
  74. Níaz, M., Klassen, S., Mc Millan, B., Metz, B. (2010). Reconstruction of the History of the Photoelectric Effect and its Implications for General Physics Textbooks Science Education, 94, 903–931. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Omnès, R. (2000). Comprendre la mécanique quantique. Paris: EDP Sciences.Google Scholar
  76. Osnaghi, S., Freitas, F., and Freire, O. (2009). The origin of the Everettian heresy. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 40, 97–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Pais, A. (1991). Niels Bohr's times: in physics, philosophy, and polity. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  78. Passon, O. (2004). How to teach quantum mechanics. European Journal of Physics, 25, 765–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Paty, M. (1999). Are quantum systems physical objects with physical properties? European Journal of Physics 20, 373–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Paty, M. (2000). Interprétations et significations en physique quantique. Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 212, 2, 17–60.Google Scholar
  81. Pospievich, G. (2003). Philosophy and quantum mechanics in science teaching. Science & Education, 12, 559–571.Google Scholar
  82. Redhead, M. (1987). Incompleteness, Nonlocality, and Realism - A Prolegomenon to the Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics. Oxford: Clarendon Press - Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  83. Rosa, R. (2012). The Merli–Missiroli–Pozzi Two-Slit Electron-Interference Experiment, Physics in Perspective, 14(2), 178–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Schenzle, A. (1996). Illusion or reality: the measurement process in quantum optics. Contemporary Physics, 37 (4), 303–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Schweber, S. (1986). The empiricist temper regnant: theoretical physics in the United States 1920–1950. Part 1. Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences, 17, 55–98.Google Scholar
  86. Shankar, R. (1994). Principles of Quantum Mechanics. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Shimony, A. (2009). “Bell’s Theorem”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2009 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2009/entries/bell-theorem/>.
  88. Silva, I., Freire, O. (2013). The Concept of the Photon in Question: The Controversy Surrounding the HBT Effect circa 1956–1958, Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences, 43(4), 453–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Singh, C. (2001). Student understanding of quantum mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 69(8), 885–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Singh, C. (2006). Assessing and improving student understanding of quantum mechanics. In P. Heron, L. McCullough, and J. Marx (Eds) 2005 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings. Melville, NY: AIP Press, 69–72.Google Scholar
  91. Singh, C. (2008). Interactive learning on quantum mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 75(4–5), 400–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Thaller, B. (2000). Visual quantum mechanics: selected topics with computer-generated animations of quantum-mechanical phenomena. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  93. Thorn, J. J., Neel, S. M., Donato, V. W., Bergreen, G. S., Davies, R. E., Beck, M. (2004). Observing the quantum behavior of light in an undergraduate laboratory. American Journal of Physics, 72(9), 1210–1219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Tsaparlis, G., Papaphotis, G. (2009). High-school students’ conceptual difficulties and attempts at a conceptual change. International Journal of Science Education, 31(7), 895–930.Google Scholar
  95. Velentzas, A., Halkia, K. (2011). The ‘Heisenberg’s Microscope’ as an Example of Using Thought Experiments in Teaching Physics Theories to Students of the Upper Secondary School. Research in Science Education, 41, 525–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Velentzas, a., Halkia, K., Skordoulis, C. (2007). Thought Experiments in the Theory of Relativity and in Quantum Mechanics: Their Presence in Textbooks and in Popular Science Books. Science & Education, 16, 353–370.Google Scholar
  97. Wheeler, J. A., Zurek, W. H. (Eds.). (1983). Quantum theory and measurement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  98. Wuttiprom, S., Sharma, M. D., Johnston, I. D., Chitaree, R., & Soankwan, C. (2009). Development and use of a conceptual survey in introductory quantum physics. International Journal of Science Education, 31(5), 631–654.Google Scholar
  99. Yeang, C-P. (2011). Engineering Entanglement, Conceptualizing Quantum Information. Annals of Science, 68(3), 325–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Zeilinger, A. (1999). In retrospect: Albert Einstein: philosopher – scientist. Nature, 398(6724), 210–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Zollman, D., Rebello, N. S., Hogg, K. (2002). Quantum mechanics for everyone: Hands-on activities integrated with technology. American Journal of Physics, 70(3), 252–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Didácticas Específicas, Facultad de Humanidades y EducaciónUniversidad de BurgosBurgosSpain
  2. 2.Instituto de FísicaUniversidade Federal da BahiaSalvadorBrazil

Personalised recommendations