Using Problem-Based Learning to Contextualize the Science Experiences of Urban Teachers and Students

Chapter

Abstract

If producing a twentieth-century workforce is a major goal of science reform initiatives, access to the knowledge and skills undergirding the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics fields requires equitable learning opportunities. However, many students, especially those in urban settings, are not provided with high-quality opportunities to engage in science. Therefore, spaces must be created that enable all students to investigate science in meaningful ways. By empowering urban teachers and their students to be involved in the active construction of knowledge, learners are provided with opportunities to generate and share explanations and analyses, thus creating agency. In this chapter, problem-based learning is highlighted as an instructional model that can be used to contextualize the science experiences of teachers and students in real-world problems relevant to themselves and their community while concurrently developing the critical thinking skills necessary to participate in a global society.

Keywords

Preservice Teacher Science Teacher Science Classroom Urban Student Underrepresented Group 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1990). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Atwater, M. M. (1996). Social constructivism: Infusion of the multicultural science education research agenda. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 82–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atwater, M. M. (2000). Equity for Black Americans in precollege science. Science Education, 84, 154–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ball, A. L., & Knobloch, N. A. (2004). An exploration of the outcomes of utilizing ill-structured problems in pre-service teacher preparation. Journal of Agricultural Education, 45(2), 62–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Banks, J. A. (2006). Cultural diversity and education (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  6. Barnes, A. B., & Barnes, L. W. (2005). An approach to working with prospective and current science teachers. In A. J. Rodriguez & R. S. Kitchen (Eds.), Preparing mathematics and science teachers for diverse classrooms: Promising strategies for transformative pedagogy (pp. 61–86). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  7. Basu, S. J., & Calabrese Barton, A. C. (2007). Developing a sustained interest in science among urban minority youth. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(3), 466–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bouillion, L. M., & Gomez, L. M. (2001). Connecting school and community with science learning: Real world problems and school-community partnerships as contextual scaffolds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), 878–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buxton, C. (2003). Shared responsibility: Working to reconcile “authentic” learning and high-stakes accountability in a “low-performing” urban elementary school context. Chicago: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
  10. Buxton, C., Lee, O., & Santau, A. (2008). Promoting science among English language learners: Professional development for today’s culturally and linguistically diverse classrooms. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19(5), 495–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Darling-Hammond, L. (2004). The color line in American education: Race, resources, and student achievement. W E B. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 1(2), 213–246.Google Scholar
  12. Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Securing the right to learn: Policy and practice for powerful teaching and learning. Educational Researcher, 35(7), 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (Eds.). (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. Jossey Bas: National Academy of Education, Committee on Teacher Education.Google Scholar
  14. Dewey, J. (1910/1997). How we think. Mineola, NY: Dover.Google Scholar
  15. Freire, P. (1993). Education for critical consciousness. New York: The Continuum Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  16. Freire, P. (2004). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: The Continuum Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  17. Gallagher, S. A. (1997). Problem-based learning: Where did it come from, what does it do, and where is it going? Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 20(4), 332–362.Google Scholar
  18. Gallagher, S. A., Stepien, W. J., Sher, B. T., & Workman, D. (1995). Implementing problem-based learning in science classrooms. School Science and Mathematics, 95(3), 136–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gilbert, A., & Yerrick, R. (2001). Same school, separate worlds: A sociocultural study of identity, resistance, and negotiation in a rural, lower track science classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(5), 574–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Giroux, H. (2001). Theory and resistance in education. Towards a pedagogy for the opposition. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.Google Scholar
  21. Giroux, H. (2003). Critical theory and educational practice. In A. Darder, M. Baltodano, & R. Torres (Eds.), The critical pedagogy reader (pp. 27–56). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Goodnough, K., & Cashion, M. (2006). Exploring problem-based learning in the context of high school science: Design and implementation issues. School Science and Mathematics, 106, 280–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gordon, P. R., Rogers, A. M., Comfort, M., Gavula, N., & McGee, B. P. (2001). A taste of problem-based learning increases achievement of urban minority middle-school students. Educational Horizons, 79, 171–175.Google Scholar
  24. Haberman, M. (1991). The pedagogy of poverty versus good teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 73(4), 290–294.Google Scholar
  25. Karakas, M. (2008). Graduating reflective science teachers through problem based learning instruction. Bulgarian Journal of Science and Education Policy, 2(1), 59–71.Google Scholar
  26. Lee, J. S., & Bowen, N. K. (2006). Parent involvement, cultural capital, and the achievement gap among elementary school children. American Educational Research Journal, 43, 193–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lee, O. (1999). Equity implications based on the conceptions of science achievement in major reform documents. Review of Education Research, 69(1), 83–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lee, O., & Lukyx, A. (2006). Science education and student diversity: Synthesis and research agenda. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Levin, B., Hibbard, K., & Rock, T. (2002). Using problem-based learning as a tool for learning to teach students with special needs. Teacher Education and Special Education, 25(3), 278–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., & Foy, P. (2008). TIMSS 20007 international science report: Findings from IEA’s trends in international mathematics and science study at the fourth and eighth grades. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.Google Scholar
  31. McConnel, T. J., Eberhardt, J., Parker, J. M., Stanaway, J. C., Lundeberg, M. A., Koehler, M. J., et al. (2008). The PBL project for teachers: Using problem-based learning to guide K-12 science teachers’ professional learning. MSTA Journal, 53, 16–21.Google Scholar
  32. McDonald, J. T., & LaLopa, J. (2006). Problem-based learning in the science classroom. MSTA Journal, 51(2), 6–10.Google Scholar
  33. McLaren, P. (1993). Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy in the social foundations of education. White Plains, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
  34. Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & González, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 132–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. National Center for Educational Statistics. (2009). National Center for Educational Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  36. National Center for Educational Statistics. (2011). The nation’s report card: Science 2009. Retrieved May 10, 2012, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2011451
  37. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  38. National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  39. Oakes, J. (2005). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality (2nd ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Obama, B. (2010, September 16). Remarks by the president at the announcement of the “Change the Equation” initiative. Retrieved December 1, 2010, from www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2010/09/16/remarks-president-announcement-change-equation-initiative
  41. Parsons, E. C. (2008). Learning contexts, black cultural ethos, and the science achievement of African American students in urban middle schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(6), 665–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Piaget, J. (1973). To understand is to invent. New York: Grossman.Google Scholar
  43. Quartaroli, M., & Sherman, F. (2011). Problem-based learning: Valuing cultural diversity in science education with Native students. In J. Reyhner, W. S. Gilbert, & L. Lockard (Eds.), Honoring our heritage: Culturally appropriate approaches to indigenous education (pp. 57–74). Flagstaff, AZ: Northern Arizona University.Google Scholar
  44. Rivet, A. E., & Krajcik, J. S. (2008). Contextualizing instruction: Leveraging students’ prior knowledge and experiences to foster understanding of middle school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 79–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rutherford, F. J., & Ahlgren, A. (1990). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press. http://www.project2061.org/publications/sfaa/online/sfaatoc.htm.
  46. Sterling, D. R., Matkins, J. J., Frazier, W. M., & Logerwell, M. G. (2007). Science camp as a transformative experience for students, parents, and teachers in the urban setting. School Science and Mathematics, 107(4), 134–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Strobel, J., & van Barneveld, A. (2009). When is PBL more effective? A meta-synthesis of meta-analyses comparing PBL to conventional classrooms. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 3(1), 44–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Weiss, R. E. (2003). Designing problems to promote higher-order thinking. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 95, 25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. New Jersey: Merrill Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  50. Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (1998). Educative assessment: Designing assessment to inform and improve student performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  51. Zeichner, K. (1996). Educating teachers for cultural diversity. In K. Zeichner, S. Melnick, & M. Gomez (Eds.), Currents in reform in preservice teacher education (pp. 133–175). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Curriculum and InstructionKennesaw State UniversityKennesawUSA

Personalised recommendations