Mathematics Curriculum in School Education pp 209-229 | Cite as

# Forging New Opportunities for Problem Solving in Australian Mathematics Classrooms through the First National Mathematics Curriculum

## Abstract

Although the Federal government in Australia has tried on previous occasions to exert a greater influence on curriculum development, curriculum development was the responsibility of each of the eight states and territories until quite recently. The new Labour Government in 2007 has employed increased central control and accountability measures, with national testing in grades 3, 5, 7 and 9 from 2008, publication of school results on a MySchool website, and the development of the first national curriculum in English, Mathematics, Science and History. States are still responsible for implementation, but the new funding model means they must comply with national curriculum implementation up to grade 10. Developing the first national curriculum for mathematics has been a challenge, but a plan of mathematics learning for each grade level organised into three content strands has now been developed. In addition, four proficiency (or process) strands describe the actions associated with doing mathematics. Since problem solving has been a key component of previous curriculum documents and there is evidence of limited use of complex problem solving in some Australian mathematics classrooms, the representation of problem solving in curriculum documents is examined in this chapter to explore whether the new national curriculum for Australia forges new opportunities for teachers and students.

## Keywords

National curriculum Historical perspectives Problem solving Proficiencies Teacher interpretation Authentic problems## References

- ACARA (2010a).
*Australian curriculum information sheet: why have an Australian curriculum?*Sydney: ACARA. Google Scholar - ACARA (2010b).
*Australian curriculum: mathematics F to 10*. Sydney: ACARA. Google Scholar - ACARA (2012). Australian curriculum: mathematics, version 3.0. Downloaded 3rd February 2012 from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/Mathematics/Curriculum/F-10.
- Anderson, J. (1996). Some teachers’ beliefs and perceptions of problem solving. In P. Clarkson (Ed.),
*Technology in mathematics education, Proceedings of the 19*^{th}*annual conference of MERGA*(pp. 30–37). Melbourne: Deakin University Press. Google Scholar - Anderson, J. (1997). Teachers’ reported use of problem-solving teaching strategies in primary mathematics classrooms. In F. Biddulph & K. Carr (Eds.),
*People in mathematics education, Proceedings of the 20th annual conference of MERGA*(pp. 50–57). Melbourne: Deakin University Press. Google Scholar - Anderson, J. (2002). Development and overall changes to the K_10 mathematics syllabuses.
*Reflections*,*27*(4), 14–20. Google Scholar - Anderson, J. (2003). Teachers’ choice of tasks: a window into beliefs about the role of problem solving in learning mathematics. In L. Bragg, C. Campbell, G. Herbert, & J. Mousley (Eds.),
*Mathematics education research: innovation, networking, opportunity, Proceedings of the 26th annual conference of the mathematics education research group of Australasia*, Geelong, Victoria (pp. 72–79). Google Scholar - Anderson, J. (2005). Implementing problem solving in mathematics classrooms: what support do teachers want? In P. Clarkson, A. Downton, D. Gronn, M. Horne, A. McDonough, R. Pierce, & A. Roche (Eds.),
*Building connections: theory, research and practice, Proceedings of the 28th annual conference of the mathematics education research group of Australasia*, Melbourne, Victoria (pp. 89–96). Google Scholar - Anderson, J., & Bobis, J. (2005). Reform-oriented teaching practices: a survey of primary school teachers. In H. L. Chick & J. L. Vincent (Eds.),
*Proceedings of the 29th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education*(Vol. 2, pp. 65–72). Melbourne: PME. Google Scholar - Anderson, J., & Moore, M. (2005). Evaluating the professional learning of secondary mathematics teachers: reflecting on their reflections! In
*Proceedings of the Australian association for research in education’s 35th annual international education research conference*, Sydney, Australia (ISSN 1324-9320). Published at http://www.aare.edu.au/05pap/and05154.pdf. Google Scholar - Anderson, J., Sullivan, P., & White, P. (2004). The influence of perceived constraints on teachers’ problem-solving beliefs and practices. In I. Putt, R. Faragher, & M. McLean (Eds.),
*Mathematics education for the third millennium: towards 2010, Proceedings of the 27th annual conference of the mathematics education research group of Australasia*(pp. 39–46). Townsville: MERGA. Google Scholar - Anderson, J., White, P., & Wong, M. (2012). Mathematics curriculum in the schooling years. In B. Perry, T. Lowrie, T. Logan, A. MacDonald, & J. Greenlees (Eds.),
*Research in mathematics education in Australasia 2008-2011*(pp. 219–244). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Atweh, B., & Goos, M. (2011). The Australian mathematics curriculum: a move forward or back to the future?
*Australian Journal of Education*,*55*(3), 214–228. CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Atweh, B., Goos, M., Jorgensen, R., & Siemon, D. (Eds.) (2012a).
*Engaging the Australian curriculum mathematics: perspectives from the field*. Online publication of MERGA. http://www.merga.net.au/sites/default/files/editor/books/1/Book.pdf. - Atweh, B., Miller, D., & Thornton, S. (2012b). The Australian curriculum: mathematics—world class or déjà vu? In B. Atweh, M. Goos, R. Jorgensen, & D. Siemon (Eds.),
*Engaging the Australian curriculum mathematics: perspectives from the field*(pp. 1–18). Online publication of MERGA http://www.merga.net.au/sites/default/files/editor/books/1/Book.pdf. - Atweh, B., & Singh, P. (2011). The Australian curriculum: continuing the national conversation.
*Australian Journal of Education*,*55*(3), 189–196. CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers [AAMT] (2010).
*AAMT response to the draft K-10 Australian curriculum: mathematics*. Adelaide: AAMT. Google Scholar - Barry, B., et al. (1988).
*HBJ year 6 mathematics*. Sydney: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. Google Scholar - Board of Secondary Education NSW (1989).
*Syllabus years 7–8*. North Sydney: Board of Secondary Education. Google Scholar - Board of Studies NSW [BOSNSW] (1996).
*Mathematics years 9–10 syllabus—advanced, intermediate and standard courses*. Sydney: BOS NSW. Google Scholar - Board of Studies NSW (1998).
*Mathematics K-6 outcomes and indicators*. Sydney: BOS NSW. Google Scholar - Board of Studies NSW (1999).
*Mathematics years 7–8 syllabus outcomes*. Sydney: BOS NSW. Google Scholar - Board of Studies NSW (2003).
*Mathematics years 7–10 syllabus*. Sydney: BOS NSW. Google Scholar - Cavanagh, M. (2006). Mathematics teachers and working mathematically: responses to curriculum change. In P. Grootenboer, R. Zevenbergen, & M. Chinnappan (Eds.),
*Identities, cultures and learning spaces, Proceedings of the 29th annual conference of the mathematics research group of Australasia*(pp. 115–122). Adelaide: MERGA. Google Scholar - Clarke, B. (2009). Using tasks involving models, tools and representations: insights from a middle years mathematics project. In R. Hunter, B. Bicknell, & T. Burgess (Eds.),
*Crossing divides. Proceedings of the 32nd MERGA annual conference*(Vol. 2, pp. 718–721). Palmerston North: MERGA. Google Scholar - Clarke, D., Goos, M., & Morony, W. (2007). Problem solving and working mathematically: an Australian perspective.
*ZDM Mathematics Education*,*39*(5–6), 475–490. CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Clements, D. H. (2007). Curriculum research: towards a framework for research-based curricula.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education*,*38*, 35–70. Google Scholar - Curriculum Corporation (1994).
*Mathematics—a curriculum profile for Australian schools*. Carlton: Curriculum Corporation. Google Scholar - Ellerton, N., & Clements, M. (Ken) (1994).
*The national curriculum debacle*. Perth: Meridian Press. Google Scholar - Handal, B., & Herrington, A. (2003). Mathematics teachers’ beliefs and curriculum reform.
*Mathematics Education Research Journal*,*15*(1), 59–69. CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Harel, G. & Confrey, J. (Eds.) (1994).
*The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics*. Albany: State University of New York Press. Google Scholar - Hollingsworth, H., Lokan, J., & McCrae, B. (2003).
*Teaching mathematics in Australia: results from the TIMSS 1999 video study*. Camberwell: Australian Council of Educational Research. Google Scholar - Kennedy, K. (2005). Charting the global contexts of the school curriculum: why curriculum solutions are never simple. In C. Harris & C. Marsh (Eds.),
*Curriculum developments in Australia: promising initiatives, impasses and dead-ends*(pp. 1–14). Deakin West: Australian Curriculum Studies Association. Google Scholar - Kennedy, K. (2009). The idea of a national curriculum in Australia: what do Susan Ryan, John Dawkins and Julia Gillard have in common?
*Curriculum Perspectives*,*29*(1). Google Scholar - Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (Eds.) (2001).
*Adding it up: helping children learn mathematics*. Washington: National Academy Press. Google Scholar - Lester, F. K. (1994). Musings about problem-solving research: 1970–1994.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education*,*25*(6), 660–675. CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Lovitt, C., & Clarke, D. (1988).
*Mathematics curriculum and teaching program (MCTP) activity bank—volumes 1 and 2*. Canberra: Curriculum Development Centre. Google Scholar - Lovitt, S., & Clarke, D. (2011). The features of a rich and balanced mathematics lesson: teacher as designer.
*Educational Designer*,*1*(4), 1–25. Google Scholar - Marsh, C. (Ed.) (2010).
*Curriculum over 30 years: what have we achieved?*Canberra: Australian Curriculum Studies Association. Google Scholar - Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia [MERGA] (2010). MERGA response to the Australian curriculum (mathematics), MERGA, May 2010. http://www.merga.net.au/node/49.
- McGaw, B. (2010). President’s report: transforming school education.
*Dialogue*,*29*(1). Available: www.assa.edu.au/publications/dialogue/2010_Vol29_No1.php. - Ministerial Council of Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs [MCEETYA] (2008).
*Melbourne declaration on educational goals for young Australians*. Carlton Sth: MCEETYA. Google Scholar - Morony, W. (2011). Messages about progress to date on the Australian curriculum: mathematics.
*Curriculum Perspectives*,*11*(1), 62–65. Google Scholar - National Council of Teachers of Mathematics [NCTM] (1989).
*Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics*. Reston: NCTM. Google Scholar - National Council of Teachers of Mathematics [NCTM] (2000).
*Principles and standards for school mathematics*. Reston: NCTM. Google Scholar - National Curriculum Board (2008).
*National mathematics curriculum: framing paper*. Barton: NCB. Google Scholar - National Curriculum Board (2009).
*Shape of the Australian curriculum: mathematics*. Barton: NCB. Google Scholar - NSW Department of Education (1989).
*Mathematics K-6*. Sydney: NSW Department of Education. Google Scholar - Piper, K. (1989). National curriculum: prospects and possibilities.
*Curriculum Perspectives*,*9*(3), 3–7. Google Scholar - Polya, G. (1945).
*How to solve it*. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar - Reid, A. (2005). The politics of national curriculum collaboration: how can Australia move beyond the railway gauge metaphor? In C. Harris & C. Marsh (Eds.),
*Curriculum developments in Australia: promising initiatives, impasses and dead-ends*(pp. 39–51). Deakin West: Australian Curriculum Studies Association. Google Scholar - Robitaille, D., Schmidt, W., Raizen, S., & McKnight, C. (1996). Curriculum frameworks for mathematics and science. Google Scholar
- Schoenfeld, A. H. (2007). Problem solving in the United States, 1970–2008: research and theory, practice and politics.
*ZDM Mathematics Education*,*39*(5–6), 537–551. CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Siemon, D. (2011). Realising the ‘big ideas’ in number—vision impossible?
*Curriculum Perspectives*,*31*(1), 66–69. Google Scholar - Siemon, D., & Booker, G. (1990). Teaching and learning FOR, ABOUT and THROUGH problem solving.
*Vinculum*,*27*(2), 4–12. Google Scholar - Stacey, K. (2005). The place of problem solving in contemporary mathematics curriculum documents.
*Journal of Mathematical Behaviour*,*24*, 341–350. CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Sullivan, P. (2011).
*Teaching mathematics: using research-informed strategies*. Camberwell: Australian Council for Educational Research. Google Scholar - Sullivan, P. (2012). The Australian curriculum: mathematics as an opportunity to support teachers and improve student learning. In B. Atweh, M. Goos, R. Jorgensen, & D. Siemon (Eds.),
*Engaging the Australian curriculum mathematics: perspectives from the field*(pp. 175–189). Online publication of MERGA http://www.merga.net.au/sites/default/files/editor/books/1/Book.pdf. Google Scholar - Thomson, S., De Bortoli, L., Nicholas, M., Hillman, K., & Buckley, S. (2010).
*Challenges for Australian education: results from PISA 2009*. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research. Google Scholar - Thornton, S. (2011). In search of uncertainty.
*Curriculum Perspectives*,*31*(1), 74–76. Google Scholar - Vincent, J. (2004). The numeracy research and development initiative projects.
*Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom*,*9*(4), 4–9. Google Scholar - Yates, L., Collins, C., & O’Connor, K. (Eds.) (2011a).
*Australia’s curriculum dilemmas: state cultures and the big issues*. Carlton: Melbourne University Press. Google Scholar - Yates, L., Collins, C., & O’Connor, K. (2011b). Australian curriculum making. In L. Yates, C. Collins, & K. O’Connor (Eds.),
*Australia’s curriculum dilemmas: state cultures and the big issues*(pp. 3–22). Carlton: Melbourne University Press. Google Scholar