Between History and Praise: Approaches on Understanding Humanist Biographies

  • Anja-Silvia Goeing
Chapter
Part of the Archimedes book series (ARIM, volume 33)

Abstract

Having considered all four vitae separately, a comparative synopsis is now in order. The question is why the four biographers – Sassolo da Prato, Francesco da Castiglione, Bartolomeo Sacchi named Platina, and Francesco Prendilacqua – took it upon themselves to write a vita of their teacher, Vittorino da Feltre. The answer can be given at various levels of justification, each of which is based on different traditions or can be explained by different customs. The text-extrinsic level of reality provides initial information about the external reasons that a given author might have for writing his manuscript, including the possibility of performing a service through the production of the text. From today’s perspective, this alone might be motivation enough for its composition. Among the texts under consideration here, we find Sassolo’s “promotional” interests and especially Francesco Prendilacqua’s attempt at procuring a position with the duke of Urbino, Federico da Montefeltro, as examples of this level of justification.

Keywords

Visual Artist Fifteenth Century External Reason School Reading Early Modern Time 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Plutarch. 1470. Campanus Francisco Piccolominio cardinali Senensi meo salutem. Collegi nuper dispersas grecorum latinorumque principum uitas a Plutarcho scriptas grece: a diuersis inde interpretibus latinas factas .. 2 vols. [Roma]: Udalricus Gallus: ne quem poscantur in usum edocuit pennis nil opus esse tuis. Imprimit ille die: quantum non scribitur anno. Ingenio …Google Scholar
  2. Chartier, Roger. 1988. Cultural History between Practices and Representations. Transl. Lydia G. Cochrane. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Enenkel, Karl A. E. 2008. Die Erfindung des Menschen. Die Autobiographik des frühneuzeitlichen Humanismus von Petrarca bis Lipsius. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  4. Fulbrook, Mary, and Ulinka Rublack. 2010. In Relation: The “Social Self” and Ego-Documents. German History 28: 263–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ianziti, Gary. 2012. Writing history in Renaissance Italy : Leonardo Bruni and the uses of the past. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Kindle Edition.Google Scholar
  6. Kessler, Eckhard. 1978. Petrarca und die Geschichte. München.Google Scholar
  7. McLaughlin, Martin. 2002. Biography and Autobiography in the Italian Renaissance. In Peter France, and William St Clair. eds. Mapping Lives: The Uses of Biography. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Misch, Georg. 1949–. Geschichte der Autobiographie. 4 parts in 8 vols. Bern: A. Francke.Google Scholar
  9. Schmolinsky, Sabine. 2012. Sich schreiben in der Welt des Mittelalters. Begriffe und Konturen einer mediävistischen Selbstzeugnisforschung. Selbstzeugnisse des Mittelalters und der beginnenden Neuzeit. 4. Bochum: Winkler.Google Scholar
  10. Vespasiano da Bisticci. 1970, 1976. Le Vite. Edizione critica con introduzione e commento di Aulo Greco. 2 vols. Firenze.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anja-Silvia Goeing
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Arts, Design and Social SciencesNorthumbria UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUK

Personalised recommendations