Gendered Leadership

  • Ann M. Brewer
Chapter

Abstract

At this time in history, it is still noteworthy when a woman is appointed a leader, since they remain outnumbered by men in equivalent positions. To what extent does high impact leadership have to do with gender? Or race for that matter as in the case of Barack Obama, the President of the United States? In his case, it impedes him for championing the cause of blacks over whites. The Australian Prime Minister has made gender an issue and although received international acclaim in 2011 this has not been sustained. By Obama achieving the status of President means that he has bridged that chasm for marginal groups at least in principle. Can the same be said in the case of a woman president or prime minister? Who is included and excluded in top governance and management circles is a source of continuous speculation.

Keywords

Fair Trade Gender Stereotype Female Director Female Leader Board Membership 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. Beaman, L., Chattopadhyay, R., Duflo, E., Pande, R., & Topalova, P. (2009). Powerful women: Does exposure reduce bias? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(4), 1497–1540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carter, N. M., & Silva, C. (2010). Women in management: Delusions of progress. Harvard Business Review, 88(3), 19–21.Google Scholar
  3. Catalyst. (1996). Women in corporate leadership: Progress and prospects. New York: Catalyst.Google Scholar
  4. Catalyst. (2001a). Women in financial services: The word on the street. New York: Catalyst.Google Scholar
  5. Catalyst. (2001b). Women in law: Making the case. New York: Catalyst.Google Scholar
  6. Catalyst. (2004). Women and men in U.S. corporate leadership: Same workplace different realities? New York: Catalyst.Google Scholar
  7. Catalyst. (2012). Women on boards. Retrieved from http://www.catalyst.org/publication/433/women-on-boards
  8. Davis, L. (2011). Women on board. Retrieved from www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/business…/11-745-women-on-boards.pdf
  9. Doherty, L., & Manfedi, S. (2006). Women’s Progression to senior positions in English universities. Employee Relations, 28(6), 553–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eagly, A., Makhijani, M., & Klonsky, B. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ely, R., & Rhode, D. (2010). Women and leadership: Defining the challenges. In N. Nohria & R. Khurana (Eds.), Advancing leadership. Boston: HBS Publishing.Google Scholar
  12. Equality and Human Rights Commission. (2011). Sex and power report 2011. Retrieved from http://www.equalityhumanrights.com/key-projects/sexandpower/
  13. Francesco, A., & Gold, B. A. (2005). International organizational behavior (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  14. Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford, UK/New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Greer, G. (2010, June 28). Pragmatism rules over principles for Julia Gillard, Herald Sun. Retrieved from http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/pragmatism-rules-over-principles-for-julia-gillard/story-e6frf7jo-1225884959701
  16. Helfat, C. E., Harris, D., & Wolfson, P. J. (2006). The pipeline to the top: Women and men in the top executive ranks of U.S. corporations. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20, 43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ibarra, H., Carter, N. M., & Silva, C. (2010). Why men still get more promotions than women. Harvard Business Review, 88(9), 80–85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Javidan, M., & House, R. J. (2002). Leadership and cultures around the world: Findings from GLOBE: An introduction to the special issue. Journal of World Business, 37(1), 1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jin, Y. (2010). Emotional leadership as a key dimension of public relations leadership: A national survey of public relations leaders. Journal of Public Relations Research, 22(2), 159–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jonnergård, K., Stafsudd, A., & Elg, U. (2010). Performance evaluations as gender barriers in professional organizations: A study of auditing firms. Gender, Work and Organization, 17(6), 721–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Joy, L., Carter, N. M., Wagener, H. M., & Narayanan, S. (2007). The bottom line: Corporate performance and women’s representation on boards. New York: Catalyst.Google Scholar
  22. Kenny, O. (1995). Placements in management training for Bangladeshi civil servants. Women in Management Review, 10(4), 11–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Konrad, A., & Kramer, V. (2006). How many women do boards need? Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 22–27.Google Scholar
  24. Krishnan, H. A., Park, D., & Kilbourne, L. (2006). The development of a conceptual model to explain turnover among women in top management teams. International Journal of Management, 23(3), 470–477.Google Scholar
  25. Kulich, C., Ryan, M. K., & Haslam, S. A. (2007). Where is the romance for women leaders? The effects of gender on leadership attributions and performance-based pay. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 56(4), 582–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Laff, M. (2007). The invisible wall. T+D, 61(3), 32–38.Google Scholar
  27. Martell, R. F., Parker, C., & Emrich, C. G. (1998). Sex stereotyping in the executive suite: “Much ado about something”. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 13, 127–138.Google Scholar
  28. McKinsey & Company. (2007). Women matter: Gender diversity, a corporate performance driver. Retrieved from www.europeanpwn.net/files/mckinsey_2007_gender_matters.pdf
  29. McNamee, S. J., & Miller, R. K. (2004). The meritocracy myth. Lanham, MD: Rowan and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  30. Mctiernan, S., & Flynn, P. (2011). “Perfect storm” on the horizon for women business school deans. The Academy of Management Learning and Education, 10(2), 323–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Scott, K. (2006). Female first, leader second? Gender bias in the encoding of leadership behavior. Organisational Behaviour and Decision Processes, 101(2), 230–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Simpson, R. (2006). Masculinity and management education: Feminizing the MBA. The Academy of Management Learning and Education, 5, 182–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schein, V. E. (2007). Women in management: Reflections and projections. Women in Management Review, 22(1), 6–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Soares, R., Combopiano, J., Regis, A., Shur, Y., & Wong, R. (2010). 2010 Catalyst census: Fortune 500 women executive officers and top earners. Retrieved from http://www.catalyst.org/publication/459/2010-catalyst-census-fortune-500-women-executive-officers-and-top-earners

Background Readings

  1. Bowles, H. R., Babcock, L., & Lai, L. (2007). Social incentives for gender differences in the propensity to initiate negotiations: Sometimes it does hurt to ask. Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 103, 84–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ely, R., Ibarra, H., & Kolb, D. (2011, September). Taking gender into account: Theory and design for women's leadership development programs. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 10(3), 474–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ryan, M., & Halsam, S. (2007). The glass cliff: Exploring the dynamics surrounding the appointment of women to precarious leadership positions. Academy of Management Review, 32, 549–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ann M. Brewer
    • 1
  1. 1.Vice Chancellor’s UnitThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations