Single and Happier? A Comparative Study of Marital Status, Socioeconomic Security and Wellbeing of Women in Hong Kong and Taiwan

Chapter
Part of the The Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis book series (PSDE, volume 35)

Abstract

In spite of regional differences in marriage traditions and social norms, marriage is nevertheless one of the most significant social institutions in East Asia. However, for some women in the region, the universality of marriage has now been replaced by a trend of marriage postponement or even a flight from marriage. In Hong Kong and Taiwan, although most women will eventually marry, the average age for their first marriage is rising steadily. Between 1971 and 2001, the median age at first marriage of Hong Kong women increased by 4.6 years, from 22.9 to 27.5 years (Hong Kong Census and Statistics 2002). In 2011, the median age at first marriage for women in Taiwan was 29.4 year-old and 28.9 for women in Hong Kong. This phenomenon is also accompanied by a plummeting fertility rate which could result in irreversible demographical, social and economic damages in the near future.

Keywords

Life Satisfaction Marital Status Subjective Wellbeing Married Woman Personal Income 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Amato, P. R. (2004). Tension between institutional and individual views of marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 66, 959–965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker, G. S. (1974). A theory of marriage: Part II. Journal of Political Economy, 82(2), 11–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker, G. S. (1981). A treatise on the family. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Beckett, M. & Elliot, M. N. (2002). Does the association between marital status and health vary by sex, race and ethnicity? RAND Labor and Population Program: Working Paper series, 02-08.Google Scholar
  5. Bloom, J. R. (1990). The relationship of social support and health. Social Science and Medicine, 30, 635–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borthwick, S. (1985). Changing concepts of the role of women from the late Qing to the May fourth period. In D. Pong & E. S. K. Fung (Eds.), Ideal and reality: Social and political change in modern China, 1860–1949 (pp. 63–91). Lanham: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  7. Burgess, E. W., & Locke, H. (1945). The family. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  8. Chang, J. S. (1996). What do education and work mean? Education, nonfamilial work/living experiences and premarital sex for women in Taiwan. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 27, 13–40.Google Scholar
  9. Cherlin, A. J. (2008). Public and private families: An introduction. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  10. Chia, R. C., Allred, L. J., & Jerzak, P. A. (1997). Attitudes toward women in Taiwan and China. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 137–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chiang, L. -H. N. (2000). Women in Taiwan: Linking economic prosperity and women’s progress. In Women in Asia: Tradition, modernity and globalization (pp. 229–246). Leornards: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  12. Choe, M. K., Westley, S. B., & Retherford, R. D. (2002). Tradition and change in marriage and family life. In The future of population in Asia (pp. 29–40). Honolulu: East-West Center.Google Scholar
  13. Coontz, S. (2004). The world historical transformation of marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 66, 974–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Courtenay, W. H. (2000). Engendering health: A social constructionist examination of men’s health beliefs and behaviors. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 1, 4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cummins, R. A. (2000). Objective and subjective quality of life: An interactive model. Social Indicators Research, 52, 55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Diener, E., & Lucas, R. E. (2000). Explaining differences in societal levels of happiness: Relative standards, need fulfillment, culture, and evaluation theory. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 41–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Diener, E., Diener, M., & Diener, C. (1995). Factors predicting the subjective wellbeing of nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 851–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Directorate – General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, R.O.C. (Taiwan). (2004). Survey of social development. Taiwan: Government Publishing Bookstore.Google Scholar
  19. Eid, M., & Diener, E. (2001). Norms for experiencing emotions in different cultures: Inter-and intranational differences? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 869–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Farris, C. S. (1994). The social discourse on women’s roles in Taiwan: A textual analysis. In M. A. Rubinstein (Ed.), The other Taiwan: 1945 to the present (pp. 305–329). Armonk: East Gate.Google Scholar
  21. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). Happiness and economics: How the economy and institutions affect human well-being. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Giddens, A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy: Sexuality, love and eroticism in modern societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  24. Glenn, N. D., & Weaver, C. (1988). The changing relationship of marital status and happiness. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 317–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gove, R. W., Style, B. C., & Hughes, M. (1990). The effect of marriage on the wellbeing of adults. Journal of Family Issues, 11, 4–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Haring-Hidore, M., Stock, W. A., Okun, M. A., & Witter, R. A. (1985). Marital status and subjective wellbeing: A research synthesis. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 947–953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hong Kong Census and Statistics Department. (2002). Hong Kong 2001 population census summary reports. Hong Kong: Government Printer of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  28. Jones, G. W. (2003). The ‘Flight from Marriage’ in South-East and East Asia (pp. 14–19). Singapore: Asian MetaCentre For Population and Sustainable Development Analysis.Google Scholar
  29. Jones, G. W. (2007). Delayed marriage and very low fertility in Pacific Asia. Population and Development Review, 33, 453–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jones, G. W., & Gubhaju, B. (2009). Factors influencing changes in mean age at first marriage and proportions never marrying in the low-fertility countries of East and Southeast Asia. Asian Population Studies, 5, 237–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kaczmarek, M. (2004). The midlife wellbeing, gender and marital status. Anthropological Review, 67, 57–71.Google Scholar
  32. Kahneman, D., Diener, E., & Schwartz, N. (1999). Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  33. Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., & Newton, T. L. (2001). Marriage and health: his and hers. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 472–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lai, S. (2000). Marital dynamics and the division of domestic labor in contemporary Taiwan. Paper presented at the 2000 national council on family relations annual conference, Minneapolis, November.Google Scholar
  35. Layard, R. (2005). Happiness: Lessons from a new science. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  36. Lee, G. R., Seccombe, K., & Shehan, C. L. (1991). Marital status and personal happiness: An analysis of trend data. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 839–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Markey, C. N., Markey, P. N., & Birch, L. L. (2001). Interpersonal predictors of dieting practices among married couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 15, 464–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Markey, C. N., Markey, P. N., Schneider, C., & Brownlee, S. (2005). Marital status and health beliefs: Different relations for men and women. Sex Roles, 53(5), 443–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mason, K. O., & Jensen, A. M. (1995). Gender and family change in industrialized countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Mastekaasa, A. (1994). Psychological wellbeing and marital dissolution: Selection effects? Journal of Family Issues, 15, 208–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McDonald, P. (2000). Gender equity, social institutions and the future of fertility. Journal of Population Research, 17, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McDonald, P. (2002). Sustaining fertility through public policy: The range of options. Population, 57(3), 417–446.Google Scholar
  43. Morgan, S. P., Rindfuss, R. R., & Parnell, A. (1984). Modern fertility patterns: Contrasts between the United States and Japan. Population and Development Review, 10, 19–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Oppenheimer, V. K. (1988). A theory of marriage timing. The American Journal of Sociology, 94, 563–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Oppenheimer, V. K., & Law, V. (1995). American marriage formation in the 1980s: How important was women’s economic independence? In K. O. Mason & A.-M. Jensen (Eds.), Gender and family change in industrialized countries (pp. 139–167). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  46. Parsons, T. (1949). The social structure of the family. In R. Anshen (Ed.), The family: Its function and destiny (pp. 173–201). New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  47. Raymo, J. M. (1998). Later marriages or fewer? Changes in the marital behavior of Japanese women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 1023–1034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Raymo, J. M. (2003). Educational attainment and the transition to first marriage among Japanese women. Demography, 40(1), 83–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Raymo, J. M., Iwasawa, M., & Bumpass, L. (2004). Marital dissolution in Japan: Recent trends and patterns. Demographic Research, 11(14), 395–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Retherford, R. D., Ogawa, N., & Matsukura, R. (2001). Late marriage and less marriage in Japan. Population and Development Review, 27, 65–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ross, C. E., Mirowsky, J., & Goldsteen, K. (1990). The impact of family on health: The decade in review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 1059–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Beyond individualism-collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theoretical and methodological issues (pp. 85–119). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  53. Shapiro, A., & Keyes, C. L. (2007). Marital status and social well-being: Are the married always better off? Social Indicator Research, 22, 329–346.Google Scholar
  54. Sing, M. (2010). The quality of life in Hong Kong. In D. C. Shin & T. Inoguchi (Eds.), The quality of life in Confucian Asia. From physical welfare to subjective wellbeing (pp. 113–153). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  55. Stack, S., & Eshleman, J. R. (1998). Marital status and happiness: A 17-nation study. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 67, 680–696.Google Scholar
  56. Suh, E., Diiener, E., Oishi, S., & Triandis, H. C. (1998). The shifting basis of life satisfaction judgments across cultures: Emotions versus norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 482–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Thorton, A., & Lin, H.-S. (1994). Social change and the family in Taiwan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  58. Tsai, Y., & Yi, C. (1997). Persistence and changes in Chinese family values: The Taiwanese case. In L. Chang., Y. Lu., & F. Wang (Eds.), Taiwanese society in the 1990s:Taiwan social change survey symposium series II (pp. 125–169). Taipei: Institute of Sociology, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
  59. Tsuya, N. O., & Mason, K. O. (1995). Changing gender roles and below-replacement fertility in Japan. In K. O. Mason & A.-M. Jensen (Eds.), Gender and family change in industrialized countries (pp. 139–167). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  60. Veenhoven, R. (1984). Conditions of happiness. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Waite, L. J. (1995). Does marriage matter? Demography, 32, 483–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Waite, L. J., & Gallagher, M. (2000). The case for marriage: Why married people are happier, healthier and better off financially. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  63. Waite, L. J., & Lehrer, E. L. (2003). The benefits from marriage and religion in the United States: A comparative analysis. Population and Development Review, 29, 255–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wong, O. M. H. (2005). The socioeconomic determinants of the age at first marriage among women in Hong Kong. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 26, 529–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Xu, X., & Lai, S.-C. (2004). Gender ideologies, marital roles and marital quality in Taiwan. Journal of Family Issues, 25, 318–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Yao, G., Cheng, Y. P., & Cheng, C. P. (2010). The quality of life in Taiwan. In D. C. Shin & T. Inoguchi (Eds.), The quality of life in Confucian Asia (pp. 195–222). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  67. Yi, C., Lu, Y., & Pan, Y. (2000). Women’s family status: A comparison of the family power structure in Taiwan and China. In C. D. H. Harvey (Ed.), Walking a tight rope: Meeting the challenges of work and family (pp. 91–116). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Social Sciences and PhilosophyAcademia SinicaTaipeiTaiwan, ROC
  2. 2.Institute of SociologyAcademia SinicaTaipeiTaiwan, ROC

Personalised recommendations