Advertisement

HiZELS: The High Redshift Emission Line Survey with UKIRT

  • Philip BestEmail author
  • Ian Smail
  • David Sobral
  • Jim Geach
  • Tim Garn
  • Rob Ivison
  • Jaron Kurk
  • Gavin Dalton
  • Michele Cirasuolo
  • Mark Casali
Conference paper
Part of the Astrophysics and Space Science Proceedings book series (ASSSP, volume 37)

Abstract

We report on HiZELS, the High-z Emission Line Survey, our successful panoramic narrow-band campaign survey using WFCAM on UKIRT to detect and study emission line galaxies at z ∼ 1–9. HiZELS employs the H2(S1) narrow-band filter together with custom-made narrow-band filters in the J and H-bands, with the primary aim of delivering large identically-selected samples of Hα emitting galaxies at redshifts of 0.84, 1.47 and 2.23. Comparisons between the luminosity function, the host galaxy properties, the clustering, and the variation with environment of these Hα-selected samples are yielding unique constraints on the nature and evolution of star-forming galaxies, across the peak epoch of star formation activity in the Universe. We provide a summary of the project status, and detail the main scientific results obtained so far: the measurement of the evolution of the cosmic star formation rate density out to z < 2 using a single star formation indicator, determination of the morphologies, environments and dust content of the star-forming galaxies, and a detailed investigation of the evolution of their clustering properties. We also summarise the on-going work and future goals of the project.

Keywords

Star Formation High Redshift Luminosity Function Star Formation Rate Galaxy Formation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Observations obtained with the Wide Field CAMera (WFCAM) on the United Kingdom Infrared Telescope (UKIRT). We are indebted to Andy Adamson, Luca Rizzi, Chris Davis, Tim, Thor and Jack for their support at the telescope. PNB is grateful for support from the Leverhulme Trust, DS for support from the FCT, and JEG for support from STFC.

References

  1. Baugh, C.M., et al.: Can the faint submillimetre galaxies be explained in the Λ cold dark matter model? Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 356, 1191 (2005)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benson, A.J., Cole, S., Frenk, C.S., Baugh, C.M., Lacey, C.G.: The nature of galaxy bias and clustering. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 311, 793 (2000)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Best, P.N.: The environmental dependence of radio-loud AGN activity and star formation in the 2dFGRS. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 351, 70 (2004)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Best, P.N., Kaiser, C.R., Heckman, T.M., Kauffmann, G.: AGN-controlled cooling in elliptical galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 368, L67 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bower, R., et al.: Breaking the hierarchy of galaxy formation. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 370, 645 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cowie, L.L., Songaila, A., Hu, E.M., Cohen, J.G.: New insight on galaxy formation and evolution from Keck spectroscopy of the Hawaii deep fields. Astron. J. 112, 839 (1996)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Doherty, M., Bunker, A., Sharp, R., Dalton, G., Parry, I., Lewis, I.: The star formation rate at redshift one: Hα spectroscopy with CIRPASS. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 370, 331 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Elbaz, D., et al.: The reversal of the star formation-density relation in the distant universe. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 468, 33 (2007)Google Scholar
  9. Gallego, J., Zamorano, J., Aragon-Salamanca, A., Rego, M.: The current star formation rate of the local universe. Astrophys. J. Lett. 455, L1 (1995)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Garn, T., et al.: Obscured star formation at z = 0.84 with HiZELS: the relationship between star formation rate and Hα or ultraviolet dust extinction. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 402, 2017 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Geach, J.E., Smail, I., Best, P.N., Kurk, J., Casali, M., Ivison, R.J., Coppin, K.: HiZELS: a high-redshift survey of Hα emitters – I. The cosmic star formation rate and clustering at z = 2.23. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 388, 1473 (2008)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Geach, J., et al.: Empirical Hα emitter count predictions for dark energy surveys. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 402(1330), 407 (2010)Google Scholar
  13. Hayashino, T., et al.: Large-scale structure of emission-line galaxies at z=3.1. Astron. J. 128, 2073 (2004)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hopkins, A.M., Beacom, J.F.: On the normalization of the cosmic star formation history. Astrophys. J. 651, 142 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hopkins, A.M., Connolly, A., Haarsma, D.B., Cram, L.E.: Toward a resolution of the discrepancy between different estimators of star formation rate. Astron. J. 122, 288 (2001)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ivison, R., et al.: The SCUBA HAlf degree extragalactic survey – III. Identification of radio and mid-infrared counterparts to submillimetre galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 380(199) (2007)Google Scholar
  17. Kennicutt Jr., R.C.: Star formation in galaxies along the hubble sequence. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 36, 189 (1998)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kodama, T., et al.: The first appearance of the red sequence of galaxies in proto-clusters at 2 \( \lesssim \) z \( \lesssim \) 3. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 377, 1717 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lewis, I., et al.: The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: the environmental dependence of galaxy star formation rates near clusters. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 334, 673 (2002)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lilly, S.J., Le Fevre, O., Hammer, F., Crampton, D.: The Canada-France redshift survey: the luminosity density and star formation history of the universe to Z approximately 1. Astrophys. J. Lett. 460, L1 (1996)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ly, C., et al.: The luminosity function and star formation rate between redshifts of 0.07 and 1.47 for narrowband emitters in the Subaru Deep Field. Astrophys. J. 657, 738 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moorwood, A.F.M., van der Werf, P.P., Cuby, J.-G., Oliva, E.: Hα emitting galaxies and the cosmic star formation rate at z =∼ 2.2. Astron. Astrophys. 326, 9 (2000)ADSGoogle Scholar
  23. Moustakas, J., Kennicutt Jr., R.C., Tremonti, C.A.: Optical star formation rate indicators. Astrophys. J. 642, 775 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nakajima, A., et al.: Clustering properties of low-luminosity star-forming galaxies at z = 0.24 and 0.40 in the Subaru Deep Field. Pub. Astron. Soc. Jpn 60, 1249 (2008)MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  25. Nilsson, K.K., et al.: Evolution in the properties of Lyman-α emitters from redshifts z ∼ 3 to z ∼ 2. Astron. Astrophys. 498, 13 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Patel, S.G., Holden, B.P., Kelson, D.D., Illingworth, G.D., Franx, M.: The dependence of star formation rates on stellar mass and environment at z ∼ 0.8. Astrophys. J. 705, L67 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pérez-Gonzáles, P.G., Zamorano, J., Gallego, J., Aragón-Salamanca, A., Gil de Paz, A.: Spatial analysis of the Hα emission in the local star-forming UCM galaxies. Astrophys. J. 591, 827 (2003)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Reddy, N.A., Steidel, C.C.: A steep faint-end slope of the UV luminosity function at z ∼ 2–3: implications for the global stellar mass density and star formation in low-mass halos. Astrophys. J. 692, 778 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shapley, A.E., Erb, D.K., Pettini, M., Steidel, C.C., Adelberger, K.L.: Evidence for solar metallicities in massive star-forming galaxies at z \( \gtrsim \) 2. Astrophys. J. 612, 108 (2004)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shioya, Y.: The Hα luminosity function and star formation rate at z ∼ 0.24 in the COSMOS 2 square degree field. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 175, 128 (2008)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sobral, D., et al.: HiZELS: a high-redshift survey of Hα emitters – II. The nature of star-forming galaxies at z = 0.84. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 398, 75 (2009a)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sobral, D., et al.: Bright Lyα emitters at z ∼ 9: constraints on the LF from HizELS. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 398, L68 (2009b)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sobral, D., Best, P.N., Geach, J.E., Smail, I., Cirasuolo, M., Garn, T., Dalton, G.B., Kurk, J.: The clustering and evolution of Hα emitters at z ∼ 1 from HiZELS. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 404, 1551 (2010)ADSGoogle Scholar
  34. Sobral, D., Best, P.N., Smail, I., Geach, J.E., Cirasuolo, M., Garn, T.S., Dalton, G.: The dependence of star formation activity on environment and stellar mass at z ∼ 1 from the HiZELS-Hα survey. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 411, 675 (2011)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sobral, D., Best, P.N., Matsuda, Y., Smail, I., Geach, J.E., Cirasuolo, M.: Star formation at z=1.47 from HiZELS: an H<α+[O II] double-blind study. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 420, 1926 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sullivan, M., Mobasher, B., Chan, B., Cram, L., Ellis, R., Treyer, M., Hopkins, A.: Astrophys. J. 558, 72 (2001)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tresse, L., Maddox, S.J., Le Fevre, O., Cuby, J.-G.: Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 337, 369 (2002)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Villar, V., Gallego, J., Pérez-González, P.G., Pascual, S., Noeske, K., Koo, D.C., Barro, G., Zamorano, J.: Astrophys. J. 677, 169 (2008)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yan, L., et al.: Astrophys. J. Lett. 519, L47 (1999)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philip Best
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ian Smail
    • 2
  • David Sobral
    • 1
  • Jim Geach
    • 2
  • Tim Garn
    • 1
  • Rob Ivison
    • 3
  • Jaron Kurk
    • 4
  • Gavin Dalton
    • 5
    • 6
  • Michele Cirasuolo
    • 1
    • 3
  • Mark Casali
    • 7
  1. 1.SUPA, Institute for Astronomy, Royal ObservatoryEdinburghUK
  2. 2.Institute of Computational CosmologyDurham UniversityDurhamUK
  3. 3.Astronomy Technology Centre, Royal ObservatoryEdinburghUK
  4. 4.Max-Planck-Institut für AstronomieHeidelbergGermany
  5. 5.Department of PhysicsUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
  6. 6.Rutherford Appleton LaboratorySpace Science and TechnologyDidcotUK
  7. 7.European Southern ObservatoryGarching bei MünchenGermany

Personalised recommendations