Advertisement

Singing in Space and Time: The Biology of Birdsong

  • Marc Naguib
  • Katharina Riebel
Chapter

Abstract

The variation and complexity of songbird vocalisations is striking, with some birds singing up to 1,000 different song variants. Why do songbirds sing so much and such complex songs? This chapter will provide an overview over how song is controlled and acquired, how and what kind of information is coded in different singing styles and to what features receivers attend to, thereby showing how structure is linked to function. Bird song plays a crucial role in resource defense and mate attraction, allowing us to identify the potential fitness benefits of specific singing traits. Here we review and integrate some of the key contemporary topics such as advances in understanding how early development affects signals and receiver decision rules and how information is signalled in bird communities.

Keywords

Zebra Finch Song Type Repertoire Size Male Song Mate Attraction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Amrhein V, Kunc HP, Naguib M (2004) Non-territorial nightingales prospect territories during the dawn chorus. Proc R Soc B 271:S167–S169PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amy M, Sprau P, de Goede P, Naguib M (2010) Effects of personality on territory defence in communication networks: a playback experiment with radio-tagged great tits. Proc R Soc B 277:3685–3692PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Araya-Salas M (2012) Is birdsong music? Evaluating harmonic intervals in songs of a Neotropical songbird. Anim Behav 84:309–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balaban E (1988) Cultural and genetic variation in swamp sparrows (Melospiza georgiana) I. Song variation, genetic variation, and their relationship. Behaviour 105:250–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ballentine B, Hyman J, Nowicki S (2004) Vocal performance influences female response to male bird song: an experimental test. Behav Ecol 15:163–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bensch S, Hasselquist D (1992) Evidence for active female choice in a polygynous warbler. Anim Behav 44:301–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bolhuis JJ, Gahr M (2006) Neural mechanisms of birdsong memory. Nat Rev Neurosci 7:347–357PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bolhuis JJ, Okanoya K, Scharff C (2010) Twitter evolution: converging mechanisms in birdsong and human speech. Nat Rev Neurosci 11:747–759PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brumm H, Zollinger SA, Slater PJB (2009) Developmental stress affects song learning but not song complexity and vocal amplitude in zebra finches. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:1387–1395PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buchanan KL, Spencer KA, Goldsmith AR, Catchpole CK (2003) Song as an honest signal of past developmental stress in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris). Proc R Soc B 270:1149–1156PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Catchpole CK (1980) Sexual selection and the evolution of complex songs among European warblers of the genus Acrocephalus. Behaviour 74:149–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Catchpole CK (1983) Variation in the song of the great reed warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus in relation to mate attraction and territorial defense. Anim Behav 31:1217–1225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Catchpole CK, Slater PJB (2008) Bird song: biological themes and variations, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clayton NS (1990) Subspecies recognition and song learning in zebra finches. Anim Behav 40:1009–1017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dalziell AH, Magrath RD (2012) Fooling the experts: accurate vocal mimicry in the song of the superb lyrebird, Menura novaehollandiae. Anim Behav 83:1401–1410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Doupe AJ, Kuhl PK (1999) Birdsong and human speech: common themes and mechanisms. Annu Rev Neurosci 22:567–631PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Draganoiu TI, Nagle L, Kreutzer M (2002) Directional female preference for an exaggerated male trait in canary (Serinus canaria) song. Proc R Soc B 269:2525–2531PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Earp SE, Maney DL (2012) Birdsong: is it music to their ears? Front Evol Neurosci 4:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fisher SE, Scharff C (2009) FOXP2 as a molecular window into speech and language. Trends Genet 25:166–177PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Flower TP, Gribble M (2012) Kleptoparasitism by attacks versus false alarm calls in fork-tailed drongos. Anim Behav 83:403–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Forstmeier W, Kempenaers B, Meyer A, Leisler B (2002) A novel song parameter correlates with extra-pair paternity and reflects male longevity. Proc R Soc B 269:1479–1485PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Garamszegi LZ, Eens M, Pavlova DZ, Aviles J, Moller AP (2007) A comparative study of the function of heterospecific vocal mimicry in European passerines. Behav Ecol 18:1001–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Geberzahn N, Hultsch H, Todt D (2002) Latent song type memories are accessible through auditory stimulation in a hand-reared songbird. Anim Behav 64:783–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gil D, Gahr M (2002) The honesty of bird song: multiple constraints for multiple traits. Trends Ecol Evol 17:133–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Godard R (1991) Long-term memory of individual neighbors in a migratory songbird. Nature 350:228–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Grabowska-Zhang AM, Sheldon BC, Hinde CA (2012a) Long-term familiarity promotes joining in neighbour nest defence. Biol Lett 8:544–546PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Grabowska-Zhang AM, Wilkin TA, Sheldon BC (2012b) Effects of neighbor familiarity on reproductive success in the great tit (Parus major). Behav Ecol 23:322–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hall ML (2004) A review of hypotheses for the functions of avian duetting. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 55:415–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hall ML (2009) A review of vocal duetting in birds. Adv Study Behav 40:67–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hasselquist D, Svon B, Schantz T (1996) Correlation between male song repertoire, extra-pair paternity and offspring survival in the great reed warbler. Nature 381:229–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hoese WJ, Podos J, Boetticher NC, Nowicki S (2000) Vocal tract function in birdsong production: experimental manipulation of beak movements. J Exp Biol 203:1845–1855PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Holveck MJ, Riebel K (2010) Low-quality females prefer low-quality males when choosing a mate. Proc R Soc B 277:153–160PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Holveck MJ, de Castro ACV, Lachlan RF, ten Cate C, Riebel K (2008) Accuracy of song syntax learning and singing consistency signal early condition in zebra finches. Behav Ecol 19:1267–1281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Illes AE, Yunes-Jimenez L (2009) A female songbird out-sings male conspecifics during simulated territorial intrusions. Proc R Soc B 276:981–986PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kacelnik A, Krebs JR (1983) The dawn chorus in the great tit (Parus major): proximate and ultimate causes. Behaviour 83:287–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kelley LA, Coe RL, Madden JR, Healy SD (2008) Vocal mimicry in songbirds. Anim Behav 76:521–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kroodsma DE, Vielliard JME, Stiles FG (1996) Study of bird sounds in the neo-tropics: urgency and opportunity. In: Kroodsma DE, Miller EH (eds) Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds. Comstock, Ithaca/London, pp 268–281Google Scholar
  38. Kunc HP, Amrhein V, Naguib M (2005) Seasonal variation of dawn song and its relation to mating success in the nightingale (Luscinia megarhynchos). Anim Behav 70:1265–1271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kunc HP, Amrhein V, Naguib M (2006) Vocal interactions in nightingales (Luscinia megarhynchos): more aggressive males have higher pairing success. Anim Behav 72:25–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lachlan RF, Feldman MW (2003) Evolution of cultural communication systems: the coevolution of cultural signals and genes encoding learning preferences. J Evol Biol 16:1084–1085PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lachlan RF, Nowicki S (2012) How reliable is song learning accuracy as a signal of male early condition? Am Nat 180:751–761PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Langmore NE (1998) Functions of duet and solo songs of female birds. Trends Ecol Evol 13:136–140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lauay C, Gerlach NM, Adkins-Regan E, Devoogd TJ (2004) Female zebra finches require early song exposure to prefer high-quality song as adults. Anim Behav 68:1249–1255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. MacDougall-Shackleton SA, Ball GF (1999) Comparative studies of sex differences in the song-control system of songbirds. Trends Neurosci 22:432–436PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Marler P (1997) Three models of song learning: evidence from behavior. J Neurobiol 33:501–516PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Marler P (2004) Bird calls: a cornucopia for communication. In: Marler P, Slabbekoorn H (eds) Nature’s music: the science of birdsong. Elsevier/Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  47. Marler P, Tamura M (1964) Culturally transmitted patterns of vocal behavior in sparrows. Science 146:1483–1486PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McGregor PK, Avery MI (1986) The unsung songs of great tits (Parus-Major) – learning neighbors songs for discrimination. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:311–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McGregor PK, Krebs JR (1982) Mating and song types in the great tit. Nature 297:60–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Miller DB (1979) Long-term recognition of father’s song by female zebra finches. Nature 280:389–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Naguib M (2005) Singing interactions in song birds: implications for social relations, territoriality and territorial settlement. In: McGregor PK (ed) Communication networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 300–319Google Scholar
  52. Naguib M, Mennill D (2010) The signal value of bird song: empirical evidence suggests song overlapping is a signal. Anim Behav 80:e11–e15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Naguib M, Riebel K (2006) Bird song: a key model in animal communication. In: Brown K (ed) Encyclopedia for language and linguistics, vol 2, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Boston, pp 40–53Google Scholar
  54. Naguib M, Amrhein V, Kunc HP (2004) Effects of territorial intrusions on eavesdropping neighbors: communication networks in nightingales. Behav Ecol 6:1011–1015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Naguib M, Kunc HP, Sprau P, Roth T, Amrhein V (2011) Communication networks and spatial ecology in nightingales. Adv Study Behav 43:239–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Nelson DA (2000) A preference for own-subspecies’ song guides vocal learning in a song bird. Proc Natl Acad Sci 97:13348–13353PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Nowicki S, Peters S, Podos J (1998) Song learning, early nutrition and sexual selection in songbirds. Am Zool 38:179–190Google Scholar
  58. Peake TM (2005) Communication networks. In: McGregor PK (ed) Communication networks. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  59. Podos J (1997) A performance constraint on the evolution of trilled vocalizations in a songbird family (Passeriformes: Emberizidae). Evolution 51:537–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Riebel K (2000) Early exposure leads to repeatable preferences for male song in female zebra finches. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:2553–2558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Riebel K (2003a) Developmental influences on auditory perception in female zebra finches – is there a sensitive phase for song preference learning? Anim Biol 53:73–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Riebel K (2003b) The “mute” sex revisited: vocal production and perception learning in female songbirds. Adv Study Behav 33:49–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Riebel K (2009) Song and female mate choice in zebra finches: a review. Adv Study Behav 40:197–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Riebel K, Hall ML, Langmore NE (2005) Female songbirds still struggling to be heard. Trends Ecol Evol 20:419–420PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Riebel K, Naguib M, Gil D (2009) Experimental manipulation of the rearing environment influences adult female zebra finch song preferences. Anim Behav 78:1397–1404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ritchie GRS, Kirby S, Hawkey DJC (2008) Song learning as an indicator mechanism: modelling the developmental stress hypothesis. J Theor Biol 251:570–583PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Roth T, Sprau P, Schmidt R, Naguib M, Amrhein V (2009) Sex-specific timing of mate searching and territory prospecting in the nightingale: nocturnal life of females. Proc R Soc B 276:2045–2050PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rothenberg D, Roeske TC, Voss HU, Naguib M, Tchernichovski O (2013) Investigation of musicality in birdsong. Hear Res (in press) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2013.08.016. The manuscript is now online first at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378595513002141
  69. Schmidt R, Kunc HP, Amrhein V, Naguib M (2008) Aggressive responses to broadband trills are related to subsequent pairing success in nightingales. Behav Ecol 19:635–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Searcy WA, Yasukawa K (1996) Song and female choice. In: Kroodsma DE, Miller EH (eds) Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp 454–473Google Scholar
  71. Slater PJB (1986) The cultural transmission of bird song. Trends Ecol Evol 1:94–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Slater PJB (2003) Fifty years of bird song research: a case study in animal behaviour. Anim Behav 65:633–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Slater PJB, Clements FA, Goodfellow DJ (1984) Local and regional variations in chaffinch song and the question of dialects. Behaviour 88:76–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Spencer KA, MacDougall-Shackleton SA (2011) Indicators of development as sexually selected traits: the developmental stress hypothesis in context. Behav Ecol 22:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sprau P, Schmidt R, Roth T, Amrhein V, Naguib M (2010) Effects of rapid broadband trills on responses to song overlapping in nightingales. Ethology 115:300–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Staicer CA, Spector DA, Horn AG (1996) The dawn chorus and other diel patterns in acoustic signaling. In: Kroodsma DE, Miller EH (eds) Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds. Cornell University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  77. Stoddard PK (1996) Vocal recognition of neighbors by territorial passerines. In: Kroodsma DE, Miller EH (eds) Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp 356–376Google Scholar
  78. ten Cate C (1989) Behavioural development: toward understanding processes. Perspect Ethol 8:243–269Google Scholar
  79. Thorpe WH (1954) The process of song-learning in the chaffinch as studied by means of the sound spectrograph. Nature 173:465–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Thorpe WH (1958) The learning of song patterns by birds, with especial reference to the song of the chaffinch Fringilla coelebs. Ibis 100:535–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Todt D, Naguib M (2000) Vocal interactions in birds: the use of song as a model in communication. Adv Study Behav 29:247–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Verzijden MN, ten Cate C, Servedio MR, Kozak GM, Boughman JW, Svensson EI (2012) The impact of learning on sexual selection and speciation. Trends Ecol Evol 27:511–519PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Behavioural Ecology Group, Department of Animal SciencesWageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Behavioural Biology, Institute of Biology (IBL)Leiden UniversityLeidenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations