Reflections of Syrian Chaos to Turkey: A Geopolitical Analysis

Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Complexity book series (SPCOM)

Abstract

It is obvious that the Middle East is one of the vastest geographic regions in the world. This hot region, where civil uprisings and major protests have erupted over the past 3 years, is currently associated with Awakening of People or Arab Spring, which began in Northern Africa. One of the spots suffering from this recent phenomenon is Syria, where increasing pressure and brutal violence is being applied by the current government, known as Baas Regime, in reaction to the demands of people for justice and equality. Powerful actors of both western and eastern countries have somehow come to be involved in the chaotic civil war in Syria by providing the existing government with overt political and financial support in line with their own political and economical interests in consideration of the geopolitics significance of this country in the Middle East. It is unfortunate that such external supports have even worsened the situation, resulting in loss of thousands of civilians due to a civil war. All of these have made Syrian Civil War a chess game played between the powerful countries. Meanwhile, Turkey, which has been keenly interested in the civil war ever since it broke out, has voiced its opinions about the war in the international arena through its political moves and the logistic support it has given to the opposition. However, the actual motive for this intervention of Turkey is based upon far more complicated and much deeper political and geographical factors when compared to the intervention of the western powers. Land border of 911 km between Turkey and Syria, ethnical and religious relationships by affinity of people on both sides of the border, relations of people and groups with their country’s regime, and their political structures are very important as far as political-geographical manoeuvers of both Syria and Turkey. This paper aims to assess Turkey’s attitude in Syrian Civil War in a political-geographical perspective and to make predictions regarding Syria’s future in view of geopolitics and geological strategies by focusing on how political developments between Turkey and Syria might affect the future prospects regarding the Middle East.

Keywords

Saudi Arabia Middle East Armed Conflict International Power Political Geography 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bérès J (2012) Syria: ‘Half the fighters I treated were jihadists,’ says French doctor. [Online]. Retrieved on 16 Nov 2012. http://www.france24.com/en/20120911-foreign-jihadists-syria-doctors-without-borders-aleppo-jacques-beres
  2. Billon PL (2001) The political ecology of war: natural resources and armed conflicts. Pergamon. Polit Geogr 20:561–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cohen SB (2003) Geopolitical realities and United States foreign policy. Pergamon. Polit Geogr 22:1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. CRS Report for Congress (2007) A defining moment, Middle East economic digest. November 16. [Online]: Retrieved on 10 Jan 2011. http://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/105180.pdf
  5. Encyclopedia Britannica (2012) The Sykes–Picot Agreement (1916). Retrieved on 12 Nov 2012, http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/577523/Sykes-Picot-Agreement
  6. Fisk R (2012) Suriye Ordusuna karşı Türk savaşçılar var. [Online]: Retrieved on 16 Nov 2012. http://www.soldefter.com/2012/08/22/suriye-ordusuna-karsi-turk-savascilar-robert-fisk-radikal/
  7. Flint C (2006) Introduction to Geopolitics. Published in the USA and Canada by Routledge, 270 Madison Ave, New York 10016Google Scholar
  8. Goodarzi J (2012) İran Suriye İlişkilerinin Perde Arkası ve Tarihçesi. United States Institute of Peace. [Online]: Retrieved on 10 Nov 2012. http://www.velfecr.com/iran-suriyeiliskilerinin-perde-arkasi-ve-tarihcesi-5297h-tr.html
  9. Güzel HC (2012) Türkmen Şehri Halep katliamın eşiğinde. Retrieved on 15 Nov 2012, http://www.sabah.com.tr/Yazarlar/guzel/2012/07/31/turkmen-sehri-halep-katliamin-esiginde
  10. Hearst D (2011) “Why Russia is Backing Syria,” The Guardian. [Online]: Retrieved on 12 Nov 2012. http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/dec/02/russia-syria-civil-war-dagestan
  11. Helmreich PC (1974) From Paris to Sevres: the partition of the Ottoman Empire at the Peace Conference of 1919–1920. Ohio State University Press, ColumbusGoogle Scholar
  12. Hinnebusch R (2009) Syrian foreign policy under Bashar al-Asad. Ortadoğu Etütler 1(1):7–26Google Scholar
  13. Joya A (2012) Syria and the Arab Spring: the evolution of the conflict and the role of the domestic and external factors. Ortadoğu Etütleri 4(1):27–52Google Scholar
  14. Kendal E. Syria – the lies being told. Retrieved on 16 Nov 2012, http://www.virtueonline.org/portal/modules/news/print.php?storyid=16458
  15. Kopeček V (2010) Russian geopolitical perceptions and imaginations of the South Caucasus. In: Beyond globalisation: exploring the limits of globalisation in the regional context (conference proceedings), pp 99–105. University of Ostrava Czech Republic, Ostrava. [Online]: Retrived on 13 Nov 2012. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/14650040412331307812
  16. Lawson FH (2007) Syria’s relations with Iran: managing the dilemmas of alliance. Middle East J 61(1):29–47Google Scholar
  17. Ministry of Economy (2012) Türkiye- Suriye Dış Ticaret Değerleri (milyon dolar). Retrieved on 12 Nov 2012, http://www2.tbmm.gov.tr/d24/7/7-9997c.pdf
  18. Muslih M (1996) Syria and Turkey uneasy relations. In: Barkey HJ (ed) Reluctant neighbor Turkey’s role in the Middle East. United States Institute of Peace Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  19. Nerguizian A (2011) Instability in Syrıa: assessing the risks of military intervention. CSIS, Center for Strategic & International Studies. [Online]: Retrived on 13 Nov 2011. http://csis.org/files/publication/111213_SyriaMilitaryIntervention.pdf
  20. Samii AW (2008) A stable structure on shifting sands: assessing the Hizbullah-Iran-Syria relationship. Middle East J 62(1):32–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sander O (2009) Siyasi Tarih İlkçağlardan 1918’e. İmge Yayınevi, İstanbulGoogle Scholar
  22. Sharp JM (2008) CRS report for Congress. Syria: background and U.S. relations. Order code RL33487Google Scholar
  23. Süer N (2008) Syria. In: Kibaroğlu M (ed) Turkey’s neighborhood. BRC Matbaacılık, Ankara, pp189–220Google Scholar
  24. Tan M, Belli A, Aydın A (2012) 2002 Sonrası ve Arap Baharı Kapsamında Türkiye Suriye İlişkileri ve Bölgesel Yansımaları. Retrieved on 16 Dec 2012, http://iibfdergisi.ksu.edu.tr/Imagesimages/files/10.pdf
  25. Tausch A (2003) Afterword: Europe and the political geography of global confrontation. A world system perspective on “Behind the war on terror”. [Online]: Retrived on 12 Nov 2012. http://druckversion.studien-von-zeitfragen.net/Afterword%20BWoT.pdf
  26. Vatan (2012) ‘Suriye’ye silah gönderiyoruz ama…’. [Online]: Retrived on 16 Nov2012. http://haber.gazetevatan.com/suriyeye-silah-gonderiyoruz-ama/491311/1/Haber
  27. Westing AH (1986) Global resources and international conflict: environmental factors in strategy policy and action. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  28. www.bbc.co.uk, Fransa: Suriye muhalefeti silahlandırılmalı. [Online]: Retrived on 15 Nov 2012. http://www.bbc.co.uk/turkce/haberler/2012/11/121115_france_syria_opposition.shtml

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Language, History and Geography Faculty, Department of GeographyAnkara UniversitySıhhıye/AnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations