Advertisement

Eco-Evo-Devo: The Time Has Come

  • Ehab Abouheif
  • Marie-Julie Favé
  • Ana Sofia Ibarrarán-Viniegra
  • Maryna P. Lesoway
  • Ab Matteen Rafiqi
  • Rajendhran Rajakumar
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 781)

Abstract

The major goal of ecological evolutionary developmental biology, also known as “eco-evo-devo,” is to uncover the rules that underlie the interactions between an organism’s environment, genes, and development and to incorporate these rules into evolutionary theory. In this chapter, we discuss some key and emerging concepts within eco-evo-devo. These concepts show that the environment is a source and inducer of genotypic and phenotypic variation at multiple levels of biological organization, while development acts as a regulator that can mask, release, or create new combinations of variation. Natural selection can subsequently fix this variation, giving rise to novel phenotypes. Combining the approaches of eco-evo-devo and ecological genomics will mutually enrich these fields in a way that will not only enhance our understanding of evolution, but also of the genetic mechanisms underlying the responses of organisms to their natural environments.

Keywords

Evodevo Evolution Ecology Stochastic variation Robustness Environmental stress Developmental recombination Genetic accommodation Genetic assimilation Ancestral developmental potential Social interactions Epigenetics Developmental plasticity Polyphenism Ecoevodevo 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Editors for their insightful comments on this chapter, and for the opportunity to contribute it in the first place. Funding for this work was provided to E.A. by the Canada Research Chairs Program and Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

References

  1. Abouheif E (1997) Developmental genetics and homology: a hierarchical approach. Trends Ecol Evol 12:405–408PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Abouheif E (1999) Establishing homology criteria for regulatory gene networks: prospects and challenges. In: Homology, vol 222, Novartis foundation symposium. Wiley, Chichester, pp 207–225Google Scholar
  3. Abouheif E (2008) Parallelism as the pattern and process of mesoevolution. Evol Dev 10(1):3–5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Abouheif E, Wray GA (2002) Evolution of the gene network underlying wing polyphenism in ants. Science 297(5579):249–252PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Armbruster WS, Lee J, Baldwin BG (2009) Macroevolutionary patterns of defense and pollination in Dalechampia vines: adaptation, exaptation, and evolutionary novelty. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106(43): 18085–18090PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bell MA, Foster SA (1994) The evolutionary biology of the threespine stickleback. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Braendle C, Felix MA (2009) The other side of phenotypic plasticity: a developmental system that generates an invariant phenotype despite environmental variation. J Biosci 34(4):543–551PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Braendle C, Friebe I, Caillaud MC, Stern DL (2005) Genetic variation for an aphid wing polyphenism is genetically linked to a naturally occurring wing polymorphism. Proc R Soc B 272:657–664PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Carroll S, Grenier J, Weatherbee S (2005) From DNA to diversity. Blackwell Science, Oxford, 258 ppGoogle Scholar
  10. Chan YF, Marks ME, Jones FC et al (2010) Adaptive evolution of pelvic reduction in sticklebacks by recurrent deletion of a Pitx1 enhancer. Science 327(5963): 302–305PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Collin R (2004) Phylogenetic effects, the loss of complex characters, and the evolution of development in calyptraeid gastropods. Evolution 58(7):1488–1502PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Collin R, Cipriani R (2003) Dollo’s law and the re–evolution of shell coiling. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 270(1533):2551–2555Google Scholar
  13. Collin R, Miglietta MP (2008) Reversing opinions on Dollo’s Law. Trends Ecol Evol 23(11):602–609PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Collin R, Chaparro OR, Winkler F, Véliz D (2007) Molecular phylogenetic and embryological evidence that feeding larvae have been reacquired in a marine gastropod. Biol Bull 212(2):83–92PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Colosimo PF, Hosemann KE, Balabhadra S et al (2005) Widespread parallel evolution in sticklebacks by repeated fixation of Ectodysplasin alleles. Science 307(5717):1928–1933PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Crickmore MA, Ranade V, Mann RS (2009) Regulation of Ubx expression by epigenetic enhancer silencing in response to Ubx levels and genetic variation. PLoS Genet 5(9):e1000633PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Darwin C (1868) The variation of animals and plants under domestication, vol 2. John Murray, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. Davidson EH (2006) The regulatory genome: gene regulatory networks in development and evolution. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Dawkins R (1978) Replicator selection and the extended phenotype. Z Tierpsychol 47:61–76PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Dubrow TJ, Wackym PA, Lesavoy MA (1988) Detailing the human tail. Ann Plast Surg 20(4):340PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Durkin SG, Glover TW (2007) Chromosome fragile sites. Annu Rev Genet 41:169–192PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Duveau F, Félix MA (2012) Role of pleiotropy in the evolution of a cryptic developmental variation in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Biol 10(1):e1001230PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Dworkin I (2005) Towards a genetic architecture of cryptic genetic variation and genetic assimilation: the contribution of KG Bateman. J Genet 84(3):223PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Eshel I, Matessi C (1998) Canalization, genetic assimilation and preadaptation: a quantitative genetic model. Genetics 149(4):2119PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Félix MA (2012) Evolution in developmental phenotype space. Curr Opin Genet Dev 22(6):593–599PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Félix MA, Wagner A (2008) Robustness and evolution: concepts, insights and challenges from a developmental model system. Heredity 100(2): 132–140PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Fernald RD, Maruska KP (2012) Social information changes the brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109(2): 17194–17199PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Findlay SD, Thagard P (2012) How parts make up wholes. Front Physiol 3:1–10Google Scholar
  29. Flatt T, Heyland A (eds) (2011) Mechanisms of life history evolution: the genetics and physiology of life history traits and trade-offs. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  30. Flatt T, Tu MP, Tatar M (2005) Hormonal pleiotropy and the juvenile hormone regulation of Drosophila development and life history. Bioessays 27(10): 999–1010PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Futuyma DJ (1998) Evolutionary biology, 3rd edn. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  32. Gangaraju VK, Yin H, Weiner et al (2011) Drosophila Piwi functions in Hsp90-mediated suppression of phenotypic variation. Nat Genet 43(2):153–158PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Gasparini C, Serena G, Pilastro A (2013) Do unattractive friends make you look better? Context-dependent male mating preferences in the guppy. Proc R Soc B 280:20123072PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Ghioca-Robrecht DM, Smith LM (2010) The role of spadefoot toad tadpoles in wetland trophic structure as influenced by environmental and morphological factors. Can J Zool 89(1):47–59Google Scholar
  35. Gibson G, Dworkin I (2004) Uncovering cryptic genetic variation. Nat Rev Genet 5(9):681–690PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Gibson G, Hogness DS (1996) Effect of polymorphism in the Drosophila regulatory gene Ultrabithorax on homeotic stability. Science 271(5246):200–203PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Gilbert SF (1991) Induction and the origins of developmental genetics. Dev Biol 7:181–206Google Scholar
  38. Gilbert SF (2010) Developmental biology. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  39. Gilbert SF, Epel D (2009) Ecological developmental biology. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  40. Gloor H (1947) Phänokopie Versuche mit Aether an Drosophila. Rev Suisse Zool 54:637–712Google Scholar
  41. Goldberg EE, Igić B (2008) On phylogenetic tests of irreversible evolution. Evolution 62(11):2727–2741PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Gursky VV, Surkova SY, Samsonova MG (2012) Mechanisms of developmental robustness. Biosystems 109(3):329–335PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Hall BK (2003) Descent with modification: the unity underlying homology and homoplasy as seen through an analysis of development and evolution. Biol Rev 78(3):409–433PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Hall BK (2013) Epigenesis, epigenetics, and the epigenotype: toward an inclusive concept of development and evolution. In: Brian G. Henning, Adam C. Scarfe (eds) Beyond mechanism: putting life back into biology. Lexington Books, Maryland, pp 348–371Google Scholar
  45. Harris MP, Hasso SM, Ferguson MW, Fallon JF (2006) The development of archosaurian first-generation teeth in a chicken mutant. Curr Biol 16(4):371–377PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Hayden EJ, Ferrada E, Wagner A (2011) Cryptic genetic variation promotes rapid evolutionary adaptation in an RNA enzyme. Nature 474(7349):92–95PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Heitzler P, Simpson P (1991) The choice of cell fate in the epidermis of Drosophila. Cell 64(6):1083–1092PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Hölldobler B, Wilson E (1990) The ants. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  49. Hölldobler B, Wilson E (2008) The superorganism: the beauty, elegance and strangeness of insect societies. W.W. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  50. Holloway DM, Lopes FJ, da Fontoura Costa L et al (2011) Gene expression noise in spatial patterning: hunchback promoter structure affects noise amplitude and distribution in Drosophila segmentation. PLoS Comput Biol 7(2):e1001069PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Huang MH (2010) Multi-phase defense by the big-headed ant, Pheidole obtusospinosa, against raiding army ants. J Insect Sci 10:1PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Hudson A (1966) Proteins in the haemolymph and other tissues of the developing tomato hornworm, Protoparce quinquemaculata Haworth. Can J Zool 44(4):541–555PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Jagers op Akkerhuis GAJM (2008) Analysing hierarchy in the organization of biological and physical systems. Biol Rev 83(1):1–12PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Jenner RA, Wills MA (2007) The choice of model organisms in evo–devo. Nat Rev Genet 8(4):311–314PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Jones FC, Grabherr MG, Chan YF et al (2012) The genomic basis of adaptive evolution in threespine sticklebacks. Nature 484(7392):55–61PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Kilfoil ML, Lasko P, Abouheif E (2009) Stochastic variation: from single cells to superorganisms. HFSP J 3(6):379–385PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Kohlsdorf T, Wagner GP (2006) Evidence for the reversibility of digit loss: a phylogenetic study of limb evolution in Bachia (Gymnophthalmidae: Squamata). Evolution 60(9):1896–1912PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Kohlsdorf T, Lynch VJ, Rodrigues MT, Brandley MC, Wagner GP (2010) Data and data interpretation in the study of limb evolution: a reply to Galis et al. on the reevolution of digits in the lizard genus Bachia. Evolution 64(8):2477–2485Google Scholar
  59. Landry CR (2009) Systems biology spins off a new model for the study of canalization. Trends Ecol Evol 24(2):63–66PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Ledón‐Rettig CC, Pfennig DW (2011) Emerging model systems in eco‐evo‐devo: the environmentally responsive spadefoot toad. Evol Dev 13(4):391–400PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Ledón-Rettig CC, Pfennig DW, Crespi EJ (2010) Diet and hormonal manipulation reveal cryptic genetic variation: implications for the evolution of novel feeding strategies. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 277(1700):3569–3578Google Scholar
  62. Levinton JS (1986) Developmental constraints and evolutionary saltations: a discussion and critique. In: Gustafson JP, Stebbins GL, Ayala FJ (eds) Genetics, development and evolution. Plenum, New York, pp 253–288Google Scholar
  63. Levy SF, Siegal ML (2008) Network hubs buffer environmental variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Biol 6(11):e264PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Lewontin R (1970) The units of selection. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 1:1–18Google Scholar
  65. Lewontin R (1974) Annotation: analysis of variance and analysis of causes. Am J Hum Genet 26(3):400–411PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Longo G, Miquel PA, Sonnenschein C, Soto AM (2012) Is information a proper observable for biological organization? Prog Biophys Mol Biol 109(3):108–114PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Losick R, Desplan C (2008) Stochasticity and cell fate. Science 320(5872):65–68PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Ma W, Lai L, Ouyang Q, Tang C (2006) Robustness and modular design of the Drosophila segment polarity network. Mol Syst Biol 2:70PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. MacMahon JA, Phillips DL, Robinson JV, Schimpf DJ (1978) Levels of biological organization: an organism-centered approach. BioScience 28(11):700–704PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Masel J, Siegal M (2009) Robustness: mechanisms and consequences. Trends Genet 25(9):395–403PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. McAdams HH, Arkin A (1999) It’s a noisy business! Genetic regulation at the nanomolar scale. Trends Genet 15(2):65–69PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. McGlashan JK, Spencer R-J, Old JM (2012) Embryonic communication in the nest: metabolic responses of reptilian embryos to developmental rates of siblings. Proc R Soc B 279:1709–1715PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Moczek AP, Nijhout HF (2002) Developmental mechanisms of threshold evolution in a polyphenic beetle. Evol Dev 4(4):252–264PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Nijhout HF (1998) Insect hormones. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  75. Nijhout HF (1999) Control mechanisms of polyphenic development in insects. Bioscience 49(3):181–192Google Scholar
  76. Nijhout HF, Emlen DJ (1998) Competition among body parts in the development and evolution of insect morphology. Proc Natl Acad Sci 95:3685–3689PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Pal-Bhadra M, Leibovitch BA, Gandhi SG et al (2004) Heterochromatic silencing and HP1 localization in Drosophila are dependent on the RNAi machinery. Science 303(5658):669–672PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Passera L (1977) Production des soldats dans les societes sortant d’hibernation chez la fourmi Pheidole pallidulla (NYL.) (Formicidae, Myrmicinae). Insect Soc 24(2):131–146Google Scholar
  79. Passera L, Roncin E, Kaufmann B, Keller L (1996) Increased soldier production in ant colonies exposed to intraspecific competition. Nature 379:630–631Google Scholar
  80. Peeters C, Liebig J, Hölldobler B (2000) Sexual reproduction by both queens and workers in the ponerine ant Harpegnathos saltator. Insect Soc 47:325–332Google Scholar
  81. Pfennig DW, Murphy PJ (2000) Character displacement in polyphenic tadpoles. Evolution 54(5):1738–1749PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Pie MR, Traniello JFA (2007) Morphological evolution in a hyperdiverse clade: the ant genus Pheidole. J Zool 271(1):99–109Google Scholar
  83. Pigliucci M, Kaplan J (2006) Making sense of evolution: the conceptual foundations of evolutionary biology. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  84. Proulx SR, Phillips PC (2005) The opportunity for canalization and the evolution of genetic networks. Am Nat 165(2):147–162PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Rajakumar R, San Mauro D, Dijkstra MB et al (2012) Ancestral developmental potential facilitates parallel evolution in ants. Science 335(6064):79–82PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Renn SCP, Aubin-Horth N, Hoffman HA (2008) Fish and chips: functional genomics of social plasticity in an African cichlid fish. J Exp Biol 211:3041–3056PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Rockman MV, Wray GA (2002) Abundant raw material for cis-regulatory evolution in humans. Mol Biol Evol 19(11):1991–2004PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Roff DA (1996) The evolution of threshold traits in animals. Q Rev Biol 71:3–35Google Scholar
  89. Roff DA, Fairbairn DJ (1991) Wing dimorphisms and the evolution of migratory polymorphisms among the Insecta. Am Zool 31(1):243–251Google Scholar
  90. Rutherford SL, Lindquist S (1998) Hsp90 as a capacitor for morphological evolution. Nature 396(6709):336–342PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Schlosser G, Wagner GP (2004) Modularity in development and evolution. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  92. Schluter D (2000) The ecology of adaptive radiation. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  93. Schmalhausen I (1949) Factors of evolution : the theory of stabilizing selection. Blakiston Co., PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  94. Shbailat SJ, Abouheif E (2012) The wing-patterning network in the wingless castes of Myrmicine and Formicine Ant species is a mix of evolutionarily labile and non-labile genes. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol 9999B:1–10Google Scholar
  95. Shbailat SJ, Khila A, Abouheif E (2010) Correlations between spatiotemporal changes in gene expression and apoptosis underlie wing polyphenism in the ant Pheidole morrisi. Evol Dev 12(6):580–591PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Siegal ML, Bergman A (2002) Waddington’s canalization revisited: developmental stability and evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99(16):10528–10532PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Stiassny MLJ (2003) Atavism. In: Hall BK, Olsen WM (eds) Keywords and concepts in evolutionary developmental biology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 10–14Google Scholar
  98. Suzuki Y, Nijhout HF (2006) Evolution of a polyphenism by genetic accomodation. Science 311:650–652PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Tinbergen N (1971) Social behaviour in animals, with a special reference to vertebrates, Science paperbacks. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  100. Tomić N, Meyer-Rochow VB (2011) Atavisms: medical, genetic, and evolutionary implications. Perspect Biol Med 54(3):332–353PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Tomoyasu Y, Arakane Y, Kramer KJ, Denell RE (2009) Repeated co-options of exoskeleton formation during wing-to-elytron evolution in beetles. Curr Biol 19(24):2057–2065PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Ungerer MC, Johnson LC, Herman MA (2008) Ecological genomics: understanding gene and genome function in the natural environment. Heredity 100:178–183PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. Valentine JW (2003) Architectures of biological complexity. Integr Comp Biol 43(1):99–103PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. von Dassow G, Meir E, Munro EM, Odell GM (2000) The segment polarity network is a robust developmental module. Nature 406(6792):188–192Google Scholar
  105. Waddington CH (1942) Canalization of development and the inheritance of acquired characters. Nature 150:563–565Google Scholar
  106. Waddington CH (1956) Genetic assimilation of the bithorax phenotype. Evolution 10(1):1–13Google Scholar
  107. Waddington CH (1957) The genetic basis of ‘assimilated bithorax’ stock. J Genet 55(2):241–245Google Scholar
  108. Waddington CH (1959) Evolutionary systems-animal and human. Nature 183(4676):1634–1638PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. Wagner A (2005) Distributed robustness versus redundancy as causes of mutational robustness. Bioessays 27(2):176–188PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. Wake DB, Wake MH, Specht CD (2011) Homoplasy: from detecting pattern to determining process and mechanism of evolution. Science 331(6020):1032–1035PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. Weatherbee SD, Halder G, Kim J et al (1998) Ultrabithorax regulates genes at several levels of the wing-patterning hierarchy to shape the development of the Drosophila haltere. Genes Dev 12(10):1474–1482PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. West-Eberhard MJ (2003) Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  113. West-Eberhard MJ (2005) Developmental plasticity and the origin of species differences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102(Suppl 1):6543–6549PubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. Wheeler DE, Nijhout HF (1981) Soldier determination in ants: new role for juvenile hormone. Science 213:361–363PubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. Wheeler DE, Nijhout HF (1983) Soldier determination in Pheidole bicarinata: effect of methoprene on caste and size within castes. J Insect Physiol 29(11):847–854Google Scholar
  116. Wheeler DE, Nijhout HF (1984) Soldier determination in Pheidole bicarinata: inhibition by adult soldiers. J Insect Physiol 30(2):127–135Google Scholar
  117. Whitacre JM, Lin J, Harding A (2012) T cell adaptive immunity proceeds through environment-induced adaptation from the exposure of cryptic genetic variation. Front Genet 3:1–11Google Scholar
  118. Whiting MF, Bradler S, Maxwell T (2003) Loss and recovery of wings in stick insects. Nature 421(6920):264–267PubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. Wiens JJ (2011) Re-evolution of lost mandibular teeth in frogs after more than 200 million years, and re-evaluating Dollo’s law. Evolution 65(5):1283–1296PubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. Wray GA (1999) Evolutionary dissociations between homologous genes and homologous structures. In: Bock GR, Cardew G (eds) Homology. Wiley, Chichester, pp 189–206Google Scholar
  121. Wray GA, Abouheif E (1998) When is homology not homology? Curr Opin Genet Dev 8(6):675–680PubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. Wray GA, Hahn MW, Abouheif E, Balhoff JP, Pizer M, Rockman MV, Romano LA (2003) The evolution of transcriptional regulation in eukaryotes. Mol Biol Evol 20(9):1377–1419PubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. Wund MA, Baker JA, Clancy B et al (2008) A test of the “flexible stem” model of evolution: ancestral plasticity, genetic accommodation, and morphological divergence in the threespine stickleback radiation. Am Nat 172(4):449–462PubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. Wund MA, Valena S, Wood S, Baker JA (2012) Ancestral plasticity and allometry in threespine stickleback reveal phenotypes associated with derived, freshwater ecotypes. Biol J Linn Soc 105(3):573–583Google Scholar
  125. Yang AS, Martin CH, Nijhout HF (2004) Geographic variation in caste structure among ant populations. Curr Biol 14(6):514–519PubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. Zera AJ, Tiebel KC (1988) Brachypterizing effect of group rearing, juvenile hormone III and methoprene in the wing-dimorphic cricket, Gryllus rubens. J Insect Physiol 34(6):489–498Google Scholar
  127. Zera AJ, Harshman LG, Williams TD (2007) Evolutionary endocrinology: the developing synthesis between endocrinology and evolutionary genetics. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 38:793–817Google Scholar
  128. Zylstra U (1992) Living things as hierarchically organized structures. Synthese 91(1–2):111–133Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ehab Abouheif
    • 1
  • Marie-Julie Favé
    • 1
  • Ana Sofia Ibarrarán-Viniegra
    • 1
  • Maryna P. Lesoway
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ab Matteen Rafiqi
    • 1
  • Rajendhran Rajakumar
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Smithsonian Tropical Research InstitutePanamáRepública de Panamá

Personalised recommendations