‘New Basic Skills’, Nonbasic Skills, Knowledge Practices and Judgement: Tensions Between the Needs of Basic Literacy, of Vocational Education and Training and of Higher and Professional Learning

Chapter
Part of the Lifelong Learning Book Series book series (LLLB, volume 19)

Abstract

The emphasis, in the service of promoting lifelong learning, in various national and European level government policy initiatives on developing basic skills in their populations for the workplace and for other uses in life has been, and is still, in different ways both appropriate and not appropriate. It is appropriate if we place the emphasis on the term ‘skill’ as a form of knowledge, and if we place emphasis on ‘basic’ in the context of providing a focus for increasing life’s opportunities for those relatively dispossessed. It is inappropriate if we are forced to pretend that skills are discrete, specific entities that can, along with the people in possession of them, ‘transfer’ unproblematically from one learning context to another. It is inappropriate further if we were to treat skills as always basic and technicist, as if lower knowledge levels are the limit of entitlement for citizens, or always a-contextually generic. The English conception of ‘skill’ promotes this inappropriate emphasis, which is also an economic and employment-led perspective, fuelled by neo-liberal hegemony. Domination of the English language, and hence prevalence of the English term ‘skill’, across the European Community will be reinforcing this particular conception as if it were universally appropriate. The key question concerning how we serve the appropriate policy for lifelong learning is ultimately an ontological one about the nature of skills. Certain amongst both proponents and opponents of the skills agenda are stuck in a ‘realist’ mindset which demands critique. It promotes, on the one hand, an unhelpful deficit model of skills as discrete concrete requirements and, on the other hand, gives licence to the equally unhelpful challenge that skills and higher knowledge attainments are worlds apart. Reconceptualising skills as ‘knowledge practices’ enables us to open up analysis of the term and avoid the unhelpful connotations. In turn, we can understand better how an agent can exploit knowledge from one context of use into another and can develop judgement, the most important of all ‘skills‘, and get closer to the ‘Good Life’.

Keywords

Lifelong Learning Basic Skill Knowledge Practice High Education Degree European Qualification Framework 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Barnett, R. (1990). The idea of higher education. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Borg, C., & Mayo, P. (2004). Diluted wine in new bottles: The key messages of the memorandum. LLinE: Lifelong Learning in Europe, 9(1), 18–25.Google Scholar
  3. Borg, C., & Mayo, P. (2005). The EU Memorandum on lifelong learning. Old wine in new bottles? Globalisation, Societies and Education, 3(2), 203–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brockmann, M., Clarke, L., Winch, C., Hanf, G., Méhaut, P., & Westerhuis, A. (2011). Knowledge, skills and competence in the European labour market: What’s in a vocational qualification? Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Chisholm, L., Larson, A., & Mossoux, A.-F. (2004). Lifelong learning: Citizens’ views in close-up: Findings from a dedicated Eurobarometer survey. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  6. Clarke, A., & Englebright, L. (2003). ICT: The new basic skill. Leicester: NIACE.Google Scholar
  7. Davies, P. (2001). New tasks for university continuing education and EUCEN. LLinE: Lifelong Learning in Europe, 6(1), 6–7.Google Scholar
  8. Dehmel, A. (2005). The role of vocational education and training in promoting lifelong learning in Germany and England. Oxford: Symposium Books.Google Scholar
  9. European Commission. (2000). A memorandum on lifelong learning. SEC(2000) 1832. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  10. European Commission. (2001). Making a European area of lifelong learning a reality. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  11. Eurydice & CEDEFOP. (2001). National actions to implement lifelong learning in Europe. Brussels: Eurydice.Google Scholar
  12. Field, J. (1998). European dimensions: Education, training and the European Union. London/Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
  13. Field, J. (2006). Lifelong learning and the new educational order (2nd ed.). Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books.Google Scholar
  14. Furedi, F. (2004, September 24). It’s now no longer critical and nor is it thinking. The Times Higher Education Supplement, 58. http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=26&storycode=191406. Accessed 9 July 2012.
  15. Gough, M. (2011). Education as philosophy, philosophy as education and the concept of practice: Considerations of disciplinarity arising out of learning and teaching development work. Discourse: Learning and Teaching in Philosophical and Religious Studies, 10(3). http://prs.heacademy.ac.uk/publications/discourse/10_3.html. Accessed 9 July 2012.
  16. Griffiths, T., & Guile, D. (2004). Learning through work experience for the knowledge economy: Issues for educational research and policy. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  17. Lum, G. (2009). Vocational and professional capability: An epistemological and ontological study of occupational expertise. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  18. Maskell, D., & Robinson, I. (2001). The new idea of a university. London: Haven Books.Google Scholar
  19. Rowland, S. (2006). The enquiring university: Compliance and contestation in higher education. Maidenhead: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Summers, J. (2000). A memorandum on lifelong learning commission staff working paper. LLinE: Lifelong Learning in Europe, 5(4), 230–232.Google Scholar
  21. Tessaring, M., & Wannan, J. (2004). Vocational education and training: Key to the future: Lisbon, Copenhagen, Maastricht, mobilising for 2010. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  22. van Rens, J., & Stavrou, S. (2003). Lifelong learning: Citizens’ views. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  23. White, J. (1997). Education and the end of work. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  24. Winterton, J., Delamare-Le Deist, F., & Stringfellow, E. (2006). Typology of knowledge, skills and competences: Clarification of the concept and prototype. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Education StudiesDe Montfort UniversityLeicesterUK

Personalised recommendations